similar to: Baffled with as.matrix

Hello, I probably have a syntax error in trying to generate an expected survival curve from a weighted cox model, but I can't see it. I used the help sample code to generate a weighted model, with the addition of a "weights=albumin" argument (I only chose albumin because it had no missing values, not because of any real relevance). Below are my code with the resulting error

Dear all, I am having a (really) hard time getting pyears to work together with a ratetable to give me the number of expected events (deaths). I have the following data: dos, date of surgery, as.Date dof, date of last follow-up, as.Date dos, date of surgery, as.Date sex, gender, as.factor (female,male) ev, event(death), 0= censored at time point dof, 1=death at time point dof Could someone

Dear R-users, I have a couple of questions about the relsurv package: 1) when I try to run the example: fit <- rsmul(Surv(time,cens)~sex+as.factor(agegr)+ratetable(age=age*365.24,sex=sex,year=year),ratetable=slopop,data=rdata) with the datasets in the package (rdata and slopop) it gives me an error: Error in nrow(x) : object "x" not found 2) If I have a date format

Dear R-help, I was bitten by the behavior of all() when given logical(0): It is TRUE! (And any(logical(0)) is FALSE.) Wouldn't it be better to return logical(0) in both cases? The problem surfaced because some un-named individual called randomForest(x, y, xtest, ytest,...), and gave y as a two-level factor, but ytest as just numeric vector. I thought I check for that in my code by testing

Dear R-users, While making a prediction using the randomForest function (package randomForest) I'm getting the following error message: "Error in predict.randomForest(model, newdata = CV) : No forest component in the object" Here's my complete code. For reproducing this task, please find my 2 data sets attached ( http://www.nabble.com/file/p17855119/data.rar data.rar ).

Dear All, reposting, because I did not find a solution, maybe someone could check the example below. It's taken from the help page of survdiff. Executing it, gives the error "Error in floor(temp) : Non-numeric argument to mathematical function" best regards, Heinz library(survival) ## Example from help page of survdiff ## Expected survival for heart transplant patients based

Hello, I am interested in producing the expected number of events, in a recurring events setting. I am using the Andersen-Gill model, as fit by the function "coxph" in the package "survival." I need to produce expected numbers of events for a cohort, cumulatively, at several fixed times. My ultimate goal is: To fit an AG model to a reference sample, then use that fitted model

Hi all, Can some one tell me the difference between the following two formulas? 1. epiG.rf <-randomForest(gamma~.,data=data, na.action = na.fail,ntree = 300,xtest = NULL, ytest = NULL,replace = T, proximity =F) 2.epiG.rf <-randomForest(gamma~.,data=data, na.action = na.fail,ntree = 300,xtest = NULL, ytest = NULL,replace = T, proximity =F) [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, here are three results of random forest (version 4.0-1). The results seem to be more or less the same which is strange because I changed the classwt. I hoped that for example classwt=c(0.45,0.1,0.45) would result in fewer cases classified as class 2. Did I understand something wrong? Christian x1rf <- randomForest(x=as.data.frame(mfilters[cvtrain,]),

Sir, This query is related to randomForest regression using R. I have a dataset called qsar.arff which I use as my training set and then I run the following function - rf=randomForest(x=train,y=trainy,xtest=train,ytest=trainy,ntree=500) where train is a matrix of predictors without the column to be predicted(the target column), trainy is the target column.I feed the same data

Dear R-Users, I've recently used relsurv package for relative survival analysis. In particular I've tried to reproduce the examples proposed in the R-documentation about rsadd, rsmul and rstrans functions in R latest version (R 2.14.1). These examples don't run and the error message is always the following: data(slopop) data(rdata)

Hello, I came across a problem when building a randomForest model. Maybe someone can help me. I have a training- and a testdataset with a discrete response and ten predictors (numeric and factor variables). The two datasets are similar in terms of number of predictor, name of variables and datatype of variables (factor, numeric) except that only one predictor has got 20 levels in the training

Hello R community, I have cross-posted with r-sig-geo as this issue could fall under either interest group I believe. I just came accross the alphahull package and am very pleased I may not need to use CGAL anymore for this purpose. However, I am having a problem computing alpha shapes with my point data, and it seems to have to do with the spatial configuration of my points (which form

I am cleaning up the rms package to not export functions not to be called directly by users. rms uses generic functions defined in other packages. For example there is a latex method in the Hmisc package, and rms has a latex method for objects of class "anova.rms" so there are anova.rms and latex.anova.rms functions in rms. I use:

The survexp function can fail when called from another function. The "why" of this has me baffled, however. Here is a simple test case, using a very stripped down version of survexp: survexp.test <- function(formula, data, weights, subset, na.action, rmap, times, cohort=TRUE, conditional=FALSE, ratetable=survexp.us, scale=1, npoints, se.fit,

1. A Surv object is a matrix with some extra attributes. The as.matrix.Surv function removes the extras but otherwise leaves it as is. 2. The last several versions of the survival library were accidentally missing the S3method('as.matrix', 'Surv') line from their NAMESPACE file. (Instead it's position is held by a duplicate of the line just above it in the NAMESPACE file,

A few weeks ago I reported a problem with model.frame, whose root lay in a formula expression "....+ ratetable(x1=x1, x2=x2, ....x100=x100)" that was really long and caused model.frame to fail. Brian had some indefinite ideas on what might need to change in the base code to handle it. In survival_2.36-1 the bit of code that generated the offending expression has been changed (mostly

Hello R Gurus, I am perplexed by the different results I obtained when I ran code like this: set.seed(100) test1<-randomForest(BinaryY~., data=Xvars, trees=51, mtry=5, seed=200) predict(test1, newdata=cbind(NewBinaryY, NewXs), type="response") and this code: set.seed(100) test2<-randomForest(BinaryY~., data=Xvars, trees=51, mtry=5, seed=200, xtest=NewXs, ytest=NewBinarY) The

Hi, there: I spent some time on this but I think I really cannot figure it out, maybe I missed something here: my data looks like this: > dim(trn3) [1] 7361 209 > dim(val3) [1] 7427 209 > mg.rf2<-randomForest(x=trn3[,1:208], y=trn3[,209], data=trn3, xtest=val3[, 1:208], ytest=val3[,209], importance=T) my test data has 7427 observations but after prediction, > dim(mg.rf2$votes)

Hello, does any one know how to interpret this output in R? > Classification with logitboost > fit <- logitboost(xlearn, ylearn, xtest, presel=50, mfinal=20) > summarize(fit, ytest) Minimal mcr: 0 achieved after 6 boosting step(s) Fixed mcr: 0 achieved after 20 boosting step(s) What is "mcr" mean? Thanks [[alternative HTML version deleted]]