similar to: virtio for 9.1-R

Guys, I've heard about some absurd RAM requirements for 9.1, has anybody tested it? e.g. http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=36314 -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/9-1-minimal-ram-requirements-tp5771583.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi all. I prefer to build all ports in /tmp, which is actually a tmpfs filesystem. I have 8G partition. But when I tried to compile Apache OpenOffice system starts shooting processes when I was near 6G of swap. Oct 11 18:12:32 ar1l0u kernel: swap zone exhausted, increase kern.maxswzone Oct 11 18:12:32 ar1l0u kernel: pid 1334 (java), uid 818, was killed: out of swap space Oct 11 18:12:32

There is an error in the chmod(1) man page. tingo at kg-v2$ uname -a FreeBSD kg-v2.kg4.no 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #6: Fri Apr 27 23:50:55 CEST 2012 root at kg-v2.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 tingo at kg-v2$ apropos ^sticky sticky(7) - sticky text and append-only directories tingo at kg-v2$ man 1 chmod | grep sticky 1000 (the sticky bit). See chmod(2)

Back in July, this error was discussed briefly on the mailing list(s). It appears that a fix (r238182) was submitted for inclusion in 9.1 (early). This problem still appears in 9.1-RC1. Will the fix be included in 9.1-RELEASE (or better yet 9.1-RC2)? Thanks. David Boyd. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ 1st e-mail from pluknet responding to

I have been experimenting with dirhash settings, and have scoured the internet for other peoples' experience with it. (I found the performance improvement in compiling has forestalled the need to add an SSD drive. ;-) I believe that increasing the following values by 10 would benefit most FreeBSD users without disadvantage. vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem: 2097152 to 20971520

The first release candidate of the 9.1-RELEASE release cycle is now available on the FTP servers for amd64, i386, and powerpc64. The MD5/SHA256 checksums are at the bottom of this message. The ISO images and, for architectures that support it, the memory stick images are available here: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ISO-IMAGES/9.1/ (or any of the FreeBSD mirror sites). Current

I'm running 9.2-RC4 on a handful of desktop and server machines (both i386 and amd64). I have seen three panics (all vm_page_unwire) on one of those systems only (amd64 server) during the past week. The first two panics were triggered when shutting down the ntpd daemon (a recent development snapshot version of ntpd: 4.2.7p387). Exiting a later release (p388) has not triggered the panic.

I'm running FreeBSD 9-STABLE as a guest under RHEL 6.4 KVM virtualisation. I have networking and storage in the FreeBSD guest using the Virtio drivers (with the virtual disk set to "Virtio" in the definition on the host). Everything is working nicely: I have a vtnet network adapter and see vtbd devices for my virtual disks in FreeBSD. Performance is much better compared with an

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-EN-13:02.vtnet Errata Notice The FreeBSD Project Topic: vtnet(4) network interface issue on QEMU 1.4.0 and later Category: core Modules: sys_dev Announced:

Hi. Since this revision (appeared in 6.3) I think ipfw violates POLA. I mean "ipfw table N list" shows values of table in Internet '.' notation. A friend of mine was surprised to found Internet representation of this "optional 32-bit unsigned value". For example security/bruteblock stores unix timestamps here and AFAICS there is no possibility to come back to the

Hi. I got this on today's RELENG_6 with Broadcom BCM5722 A0, ASIC rev. 0xa200. >From dmesg (bge related): bge0: <Broadcom BCM5722 A0, ASIC rev. 0xa200> mem 0xe8400000-0xe840ffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci2 bge0: firmware handshake timed out, found 0x4b657654 bge0: firmware handshake timed out, found 0x4b657654 bge0: EEPROM read timed out bge0: failed to read EEPROM device_attach:

I'm quite happy to see 9.1 out and want to ask polite and benevolent question: regarding times on the site, are iso and img files the same as 2 weeks ago? To remind noble readers. I installed on my computers what was release at that time and got it up and working perfectly. In other words, is it the same file? Best regards and happy new year Zoran

anyone knows what to do? [root at rock]# freebsd-update -r 9.1-RELEASE upgrade Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found. Fetching metadata signature for 9.1-RC3 from update5.FreeBSD.org... done. Fetching metadata index... done. Fetching 1 metadata patches. done. Applying metadata patches... done. Inspecting system... done. The following components of FreeBSD seem to be installed:

Hello, 9-STABLE fails to build with clang and *without* "NO_WERROR=" and "WERROR=" in /etc/make.conf. It used to work not long before : FreeBSD zozo.afpicl.lan 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0 r237222M: Mon Jun 18 10:18:54 CEST 2012 root@zozo.afpicl.lan:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CORE amd64 # svnversion 238067M # make NOCLEAN=yes NO_CLEAN=yes buildworld [...] ===> cddl/lib

Hello! I can't compile rtmpdump source on FreeBSD: http://sourceforge.net/projects/rtmpdump/ I obtain the following output: # gmake g++ -Wall -c -o bytes.o bytes.cpp In file included from bytes.cpp:25: bytes.h:37:20: endian.h: No such file or directory bytes.h:38:22: byteswap.h: No such file or directory bytes.h:45:2: #error "Undefined byte and float word order!" bytes.cpp:

.PLS files should work for iOS devices. See sample text: [playlist] numberofentries=1 File1=http://91.121.91.172:31090/LG73 Title1=LG73 Vancouver's Best Music Mix! Length1=-1 Version=2 On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Holden Stanford <hstanford1 at gmail.com> wrote: > You can create a .m3u or .mp3 container linking to the stream URL. I can't > remember the exact tags

Hi, This was the commit of SA-12:04.sysret to RELENG_7_4, which makes sense to me: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/releng/7.4/sys/amd64/amd64/trap.c?r1=216618&r2=236953 But when it was applied to RELENG_8_1, it looks wrong, as if it was applied in the wrong place. The indentation is broken, and the code inserted looks like it wouldn't be effective:

I've just realized that I see in releng/7 something that I did not see in releng/6 - even if I use a file with custom rules in firewall_type I still get default loopback rules installed. I think that this is not correct, I am using custom rules exactly because I want to control *everything* (e.g. all deny rules come with log logamount xxx). -- Andriy Gapon

Greetings all. Any help with the following would be appreciated. I want to create a data frame for each file in a directory. The following code does not work but it may show what I am trying to do: carmakes <- c('BMW','Chrysler','Citroen','Fiat','Ford','Holden','Honda',

With pleasure we announce the release of version 1.0.3. Here is a summary of the changes: * Show error message when failing to write a PID file. * Ignore spaces at end of lines in config files. * Fix handling of late packets. * Unify BSD tun/tap device handling. This allows IPv6 on tun devices and anything on tap devices as long as the underlying OS supports it. * Handle IPv6 on Solaris tun