Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Bug#694429: blktap-dkms: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8, 10.8): /lib/modules/$KVERS/kernel/"
2013 Jul 19
0
Processed: user debian-qa@lists.debian.org, tagging 714794, tagging 710035, found 668754 in 0.36-1 ...
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-qa at lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-qa at lists.debian.org (was anbe at debian.org).
> tags 714794 - moreinfo
Bug #714794 {Done: Gilles Filippini <pini at debian.org>} [release.debian.org] pu: package sikuli/1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-5+deb7u1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> tags 710035 - moreinfo
Bug #710035
2012 Jan 17
1
Bug#656216: xen-utils-common: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8, 10.8)
Package: xen-utils-common
Version: 4.1.2-1
Severity: important
User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails
Filing this as important as having a piuparts
2012 Dec 01
1
Bug#694891: xcp-guest-templates: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8, 10.8): /usr/lib/xen-common/xapi/CREATE_TEMPLATES_STAMP
Package: xcp-guest-templates
Version: 0.1-4
Severity: important
User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails
Filing this as important as having a piuparts
2015 Oct 14
1
Bug#801768: blktap-dkms: module FTBFS for Linux 4.2: error: too many arguments to function 'mempool_resize'
Package: blktap-dkms
Version: 2.0.93-0.3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid stretch
User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to build a
kernel module for the current sid kernel:
Setting up blktap-dkms (2.0.93-0.3) ...
Loading new blktap-2.0.93 DKMS files...
First Installation: checking all kernels...
dpkg: warning: version
2013 Oct 31
0
Processed: found 728266 in 2.0.91-2, tagging 728266, severity of 701278 is important, found 728158 in 0.9.0-2 ...
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org:
> found 728266 2.0.91-2
Bug #728266 [blktap-dkms] Depends on obsolete packages
Marked as found in versions blktap-dkms/2.0.91-2.
> tags 728266 + jessie sid
Bug #728266 [blktap-dkms] Depends on obsolete packages
Added tag(s) sid and jessie.
> severity 701278 important
Bug #701278 [src:flush] flush: ftbfs with GCC-4.8
Severity set to
2017 Sep 09
5
Bug#874751: blktap-dkms: module FTBFS for Linux 4.12
Package: blktap-dkms
Version: 2.0.93-0.10
Severity: serious
User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
blktap-dkms fails to build a module for Linux 4.12:
Selecting previously unselected package blktap-dkms.
(Reading database ... 34976 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../blktap-dkms_2.0.93-0.10_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking blktap-dkms (2.0.93-0.10) ...
2012 Jan 05
1
Bug#654757: blktap-dkms doesn't seem to always rebuild its module
Package: blktap-dkms
Version: 2.0.91-1
Severity: normal
After an update of the kernel in SID, I have noticed that blktap-dkms
didn't automatically rebuild itself when I upgraded my server with a
newer kernel version. My understanding is that it should have.
Also, doing dpkg-reconfigure blktap-dkms or reinstalling the package
did make it rebuild the kernel module.
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
--
2013 Jul 17
0
Bug#717157: blktap-dkms: Fails to build against Linux 3.10
Package: blktap-dkms
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
blktap-dkms FTBFS against linux 3.10-1 from unstable:
Cheers,
Moritz
CC [M] /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.91/build/control.o
In file included from /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.91/build/control.c:30:0:
/var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.91/build/blktap.h:75:41: warning: variably modified ?pending? at file scope [enabled by
2013 Sep 17
1
Bug#723239: blktap-dkms link with -L/usr/lib
Package: blktap-dkms
Version: 2.0.91-2
X-Debbugs-CC: wzssyqa at gmail.com
This package has one or more -L/usr/lib in its build system,
which will make it ftbfs if there is libraries under /usr/lib,
while is not the default architecture, mips* for example.
On mips* systems, /usr/lib is defined as place to hold O32
libraries, and /usr/lib32 for N32, and /usr/lib64 is for N64.
Beside the way, on
2014 May 22
2
Bug#748953: blktap-dkms: Struct bio was changed in 3.14 breaking build
Package: blktap-dkms
Version: 2.0.93-0.2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
The build fails on 3.14 kernel with the following error:
/var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/ring.c: In function ?blktap_ring_make_tr_request?:
/var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/ring.c:314:32: error: ?struct bio? has no member named ?bi_sector?
2011 Feb 15
2
Building btrfs as a dkms module on Debian
Hi everyone. I was trying to test a more recent version of btrfs on my current kernel (2.6.37) using dkms, without success.
I followed these instructions:
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Btrfs_source_repositories
- cloned the repo
- symlinked to /usr/src/btrfs-git
- patched version.sh:
Please note version.sh requires bash (better to change the shebang or fix the script).
Even with the
2011 Nov 14
2
Bug#648691: ITP: blktap-dkms -- Xen blktap kernel component DKMS package
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Xen Team <pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org>
* Package name : blktap-dkms
Version : 2.0.90
Upstream Author : Jon Ludlam <jonathan.ludlam at eu.citrix.com>
* URL : http://www.xen.org/
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: C
Description : Xen blktap kernel component DKMS package
This package
2013 Jan 26
0
Processed: switching email address
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org:
> # bugs with submitter debian at abeckmann.de
> submitter 479445 !
Bug #479445 [gnuplot] gnuplot: wrong line numbers for missing files reported during replot
Changed Bug submitter to 'Andreas Beckmann <anbe at debian.org>' from 'Andreas Beckmann <debian at abeckmann.de>'
> submitter 681568 !
Bug #681568
2014 Mar 24
1
Bug#742515: blktap-dkms: blktapblktap kernel module failed to build
Package: blktap-dkms
Version: 2.0.93-0.1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
blktap fails to build on kernel 3.13 and probably older kernels as well. According to this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blktap-dkms/+bug/1245009 VM_RESERVED is deprecated as of 3.7. Building with the patch described in that bug allows for
2008 Aug 08
2
Good reference for dkms?
I've just built the nvidia driver for my home machine for the third
time and I'd like to put it into a dkms format, but I'm not entirely
clear on what goes where to make this work. I googled for a good
primer on dkms, but what I'm finding is essentially equivalent to the
man page, which, like most Unix/Linux man pages, doesn't really tell
you "how to do this from
2010 May 31
1
dkms build error
Hi,
Unfortunately, I did not succeed to compile a btrfs module via dkms from
btrfs-unstable (commit 9aeead73782c4b8e2a91def36dbf95db28605c95) for kernel
version 2.6.34-git16. For the exact error message, please see the make.log
attached. If I replace the symlink to btrfs-unstable/fs/btrfs by a sumlink
to the corresponding subdirectory of the kernel tree everything works well.
Thanks,
Andreas
2008 Dec 03
3
What ever happened to the dkms atheros drivers/
My OQO boxes have the AR5413 wifi chipset, so for the first time in
quite a while, I again need to run madwifi. So I went looking for the
dkms madwifi rpms, but could not find them. They use to be on rpmforge,
as I recall. dkms is there.
So have I lost some memory cells or have these rpms taken a hike?
2009 Apr 06
4
DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers
I got the DKMS-system working and now have the Nvidia-drivers v173.08
installed (using rpmforge as suggested previously). Unfortunately this
particular driver version gives me screen artifacts so as to make the screen
more or less unreadable.
Nvidia's proprietary drivers are now up to v180.44 and this version is fine
with my test system.
I really like the DKMS-system, as it enables me
2009 Apr 17
1
CentOS 4 dkms-ndiswrapper
Hi - I'm trying to get wireless running on CentOS 4.7 on a dual core laptop
(latitude-e4500) for an employee.
I'm having trouble with building dkms-ndiswraper-1.54-1.el4.rf -
enclosed are the
errors messages.
The kernel was rebuilt to disable CONFIG_4KSTACKS.
The errors prior to rebuilding the kernel are identical to the errors after
rebuilding the kernel and rebooting - minus the error
2014 Apr 27
1
Bug#742515: blktap-dkms: diff for NMU version 2.0.93-0.2
tags 742515 + patch
tags 742515 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for blktap-dkms (versioned as 2.0.93-0.2) and
uploaded it directly to the archive as discussed on IRC.
Regards.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: blktap-dkms-2.0.93-0.2-nmu.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 2499 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: