similar to: replacing ugly for loops

Is there any way to search the console during an interactive session? I've looked and looked, and can not find one. In some add-on package, maybe? Sorry to be so basic, but help would be greatly appreciated. andrewH -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Searching-the-console-tp3797884p3797884.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Folks: I consider my reply below rather clumsy: One has to keep track of index numbers other than that which is inserted and must separately change column names. Is there as "essentially better" way to do this, either via base R or via an R package. I leave it to you to define "essentially better." Thanks. Cheers, Bert On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Bert Gunter

Dear folks-- Suppose I have an expression that evaluates to a string, and that that string, were it not a character vector, would be a symbol. I would like a function, call it doppel(), that will take that expression as an argument and produce something that functions exactly like the symbol would have if I typed it in the place of the function of the expression. It should go as far along the

Dear Folks-- Is there a data frame analog to sparse matrices? I am working with a panel data set that has a large number of variables that are redefined repeatedly or exist for only a few years (out of 48). In my current structure, where variables are columns and rows are years, more than 90 percent of the cells and more than 3/4 of the total size of my file are NAs. I am wondering if there is

I have a humongous csv file containing census data, far too big to read into RAM. I have been trying to extract individual columns from this file using the colbycol package. This works for certain subsets of the columns, but not for others. I have not yet been able to precisely identify the problem columns, as there are 731 columns and running colbycol on the file on my old slow machine takes

Dear folks, I?m trying to build a function to create and make available some variables I frequently use for testing purposes. Suppose I have a function that takes some inputs and creates (internally) several named objects. Say, fun1 <- function(x, y, z) {obj1 <- x; obj2 <- y; obj3 <- z <missing stuff> } Here is the challenge: After I run it, I want the objects to be

Dear folks ? I have a large (26 gig) ASCII flat file in fixed-width format with about 10 million observations of roughly 400 variables. (It is 51 years of Current Population Survey micro data from IPUMS, roughly half the fields for each record). The file was produced by automatic process in response to a data request of mine. The file is not accompanied by a human-readable file giving the

Dear folks -- There are a number of functions -- I am thinking of str() as an example -- that produce text as a side-effect, rather then returning it. Is there any way to send the text produced by such functions into a character variable? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. andrewH -- View this message in context:

Is there a mechanism to interate through a vector of strings? Say I have a data frame of 50 variables (VAR1 to VAR50), each with 100 measurements along with some coding factors (EXP and DOSE). I want to calculate the mean of a subset of each of VAR1 to VAR 50 (selecting by EXP and DOSE). Rather than just copy/pasting the same code 50 times, I thought of using a for loop to go through a

Dear folks: Let?s suppose I want a function to print return the name of the object passed to it. > myname <- function(object) {out<-deparse(substitute(object)); out} This works fine on a single object: > O1 <-c(1:4) > myname(O1) [1] "O1" However it does not work if you use lapply to pass it the same object from a list: > O2 <-c(1:4) > object.list <-

Dear Folk-- Suppose I have some objects A, B & C, and a function getDots <- function(...) {args <- list(...) etc.} If I do a call to getDots(A, B, C) then the variable args will be assigned to a list which contains the objects to which A, B & C refer, but which will not (except by happenstance) contain the names A, B, or C. I would like getDots to return a named list, with the

Dear Folks-- I'm trying to make a function that takes the columns I select from a data frame and then uses a for loop to print some information about each one, starting with the column name. I succeed in returning the column name, but nothing else I have tried using the variable colName, containing the name of the column, to refer to the column itself has worked. Below I show my

Dear All, I am quite new to R and am having a problem trying to run a linear model with random effects/ a regression- with particular regard to my variable lengths being different and the models refusing to compute any further. The codes I have been using are as follows: vc<-read.table("P:\\R\\Testvcomp10.txt",header=T) >> attach(vc) > > family<-factor(family) >

Dear folks? Is there a function to correctly find (and count) the NAs in a factor when exclude=NULL, regardless of whether their origin is in the original data or by subsequent assignment? In example number 1 below, where NAs are assigned by is.na()<-, testing the factor with is.na() finds the correct number of NAs. In example number 2, where the NAs are from the data, neither is.na(), ==NA,

There is something that I wish I had that I think would help me a lot to be a better R programmer, that I think would probably help many others as well. I put the wish out there in the hopes that someone might think it was worth doing at some point. I wish I had the code of some substantial, widely used package ? lm, say ? heavily annotated and explained at roughly the level of R knowledge of

I have a dataframe that contains fields such as patid, labdate, labvalue. The same patid may show up in multiple rows because of lab measurements on multiple days. Is there a simple way to obtain just the first and last record for each patient, or do I need to write some code that performs that. Thanks, Steven

ear folks ? I have a question, though it is more of a logic- or a good practices-question than a programming question per se. I am working with data from the American Community Survey summary file. It is mainly categorical count data. Currently I am working with about 40 tables covering about 35 variables, mainly in two-way tables, with some 3-way and a handful of four-way tables. I am going to

foo <- rnorm(30*34*12) dim(foo) <- c(30, 34, 12) I want to make a data.frame out of this three-dimensional array. Each dimension will be a variabel (column) in the data.frame. I know how this can be done in a very slow way using for loops, like this: x <- rep(seq(from = 1, to = 30), 34) y <- as.vector(sapply(1:34, function(x) {rep(x, 30)})) month <- as.vector(sapply(1:12,

Using str() in a function. I am in the early phase of learning R, and I find I spend a lot of time trying to figure out what is actually in objects I have created or read in from a file. I'm trying to make a simple little function to display a couple of things about a object, let's say the summary() and the str(), sequentially, preferably without a bunch of surplus lines between them. I

Dearfolks-- I have been told by an experienced R programmer and teacher whom I trust that it is easier to understand R code if you read it aloud, as the language that it is. However, she was clear that reading it aloud was not simply reading the marks on the screen: you read A.df[5,] as "the fifth row of A.df" (or "the fifth row of data frame A"), not as "A dot df left