similar to: [Bug 9164] New: rsync hangs or fails

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10092 Summary: Hang when remote dest's disk is full Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: list0570 at paradise.net.nz

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13109 Bug ID: 13109 Summary: rsync hangs during transfer of many small files Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10950 Bug ID: 10950 Summary: rsync hangs when specifying a backup directory Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Hardware: x64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11166 Bug ID: 11166 Summary: running with -vvv causes a hang Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter: pskocik at

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10035 Summary: rsync hangs in solaris Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: nestor.urquiza at gmail.com QAContact:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10518 Summary: rsync hangs (100% cpu) Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: syzop at vulnscan.org QAContact:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12732 Bug ID: 12732 Summary: hard links can cause rsync to block or to silently skip files Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: x64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee:

Hi All, I have had reports of problems with the -R option on OSX 10.6.4. Just tested it myself and found this odd result: When I run this "dtruss -f path/to/rsync -aHAXNR --fileflags --force-change --protect-decmpfs --stats -v /Users/astrid/Documents/main.m /Users/astrid/Desktop/rrr it produces the expected results with the relative folder paths in place

Dear Sirs, I cannot find how to check out samba-docs according to docs/README-NOW: ATTENTION DOCS TREE REMOVED --------------------------------------------------- This docs tree has been moved to a separate SVN module on svn.samba.org name 'samba-docs'. See http://svnanon.samba.org/ for details on accessing Samba svn trees. Cheers, Ilia Chipitsine

I have a new OSX Lion Macbook and would like to control VirtualBox using "virsh" (as I do with KVM under Ubuntu). I've got this far: * Installed VirtualBox * Installed libvirt (brew install libvirt) But now I'm a bit stuck :-) I ran VirtualBox itself, and created a test VM successfully. If I try to use virsh, this is what I get: Brians-MacBook-Air:~ $ virsh -c

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=926 Summary: icmp: ICMPv6 types are not supported Product: nftables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft AssignedTo: pablo at netfilter.org ReportedBy:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1250 Bug ID: 1250 Summary: extensions: libip6t_icmp6: unsupported ICMPv6 types Product: iptables Version: 1.6.x Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ip6tables Assignee:

Hello, I'm new at linux and i appreciated is somebody could help me. I have installed the latest version af SAMBA on a Cobalt RAQ550. The SNMB and the NMBD daemons are running. However, when I want to access the swat pages http://192.168.5.240:901 <http://192.168.5.240:901/> There is noting found. Regards, Peter Discart

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Deryck, Should we create a list of LDAP management tools that support the Samba schema? For example, LAM & phpLdapAdmin. http://lam.sf.net/ http://phpldapadmin.sf.net/ cheers, jerry ===================================================================== Alleviating the pain of Windows(tm) ------- http://www.samba.org Centeris

I'm curious about how one would go about contacting/hiring a samba developer to fix a bug, or implement a feature. I've got a particular bug in mind (1493), but it seems like it would be a good thing to know in general. Thanks, Mark Roach

imap-login processes are hanging (using 100% of CPU) when connected from a client that is partially blocked by a firewall. It appears that imap-login is stuck in a loop trying to complete an ssl handshake. imap-login is working fine for other clients not blocked by the firewall (including localhost). This is dovecot 2.1.10 under Mac OS X 10.8.2 (compiled from sources); the firewall is Little

We are currently experiencing a very huge perfomance drop on our zfs storage server. We have 2 pools, pool 1 stor is a raidz out of 7 iscsi nodes, home is a local mirror pool. Recently we had some issues with one of the storagenodes, because of that the pool was degraded. Since we did not succeed in bringing this storagenode back online (on zfs level) we upgraded our nashead from opensolaris b57

I tried some of the scripts in the toolkit (opensnoop, execsnoop, dtruss), and I keep seeing errors like this: dtrace: error on enabled probe ID 3 (ID 113: syscall::exece:return): invalid kernel access in action #5 at DIF offset 0 Anyone know what could be the problem? TIA This message posted from opensolaris.org

I am a newbie to samba. I have successfully setup a similar samba share on 1 machine in the past. I have everything setup as User access with the pcguest as a guest account. If I create a share to the /tmp, network users can access normally. I created a directory /var/snd and set permissions to be rwxrwxrwx. I changed the smb.conf so that permission were identical to the share for /tmp. I

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, all. I've been working on SWAT in trunk for the last few weeks. My work started as nothing more than a cosmetic redesign, trying to modernize SWAT and offer a clean, sophisticated interface. As I've gotten deeper into this, it seems to me that SWAT could use some improvements to its overall design -- not just aesthetically, but