Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "rsync in daemon mode"
2012 Sep 06
1
Huge rsyncd.log file - what do I grep for to debug rscync failures
Hi,
-rw-r--r-- 1 root other 5291457346 Sep 6 13:44 rsyncd.log
what pattern should I grep for to send you guys more information on rsync
failures (server side)
Client side messages are:
rsync of /oradb/d10 appeared to complete with NON-NOMINAL
status (rc=12) at Thu Sep 6 07:33:58 PDT 2012
with the following files reported in output:
receiving incremental file list
2012 Sep 14
1
rsync in daemon mode, no lock file generated
We are running rsync in daemon mode (::) (two colons), and in
/etc.rsyncd.conf there is a lock file specified:
log file = /var/adm/rsyncd.log
pid file = /var/run/rsyncd.pid
lock file = /var/run/rsync.lock
But I do not see the lock file.......
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2012 Aug 25
1
do the "::" mean that rsync is in server daemon mode
and is rsh the only supported mechanism in this mode?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/attachments/20120825/986de384/attachment.html>
2012 Aug 21
1
weird rsync issue
rsync fails on some directories while on others it works without issue.
Here are the inportant items:
On theserver from which directories are being copied:
more /etc/rsyncd.conf
<snip>
[abcd]
path = /xyz/abcd
comment = abcd uid = 0
gid = 3
read only = yes
list = no
auth users = test-abcd
secrets file = /etc/rsyncd.passwd
strict modes = true
hosts allow =
2012 Sep 05
1
Is the --sparse option suitable for .dbf files
Please let me know
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/attachments/20120905/15183c58/attachment.html>
2012 Aug 30
1
we have about 60 directories that rsync fine
issue is with 3 directories. Is it possible that some files in those
directories are "open", being written to etc that causes the issue?
connection reset by peer is the message we get. This is rsync in daemon
mode on TCP port 873
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2013 Oct 18
1
ownership and permissions using rsync in daemon mode
I've tried as best I can to get this worked out, and crawled the web and the
documentation but I just can't seem to figure out how to maintain ownership
and permissions from the sending side using rsync in daemon mode. I feel I
have to be missing something stupid with the proper use of uid/gid/fake
super. I'm trying to automate synchronizing some program binaries between a
production
2012 Aug 29
1
Destination file is larger than source file
We are using the standard -av switch. And both filesystems are the same -
UFS.
/opt/rsync/bin/rsync -av -e "ssh -l root" --delete
--exclude-from=/var/scripts/exclude
--password-file=/var/scripts/transfer.passwd <username>@<source
host>::<source dir>/ /<destination dir>
Source system
<source host>:<source dir># du -sh *
1K nohup.out
20G
2003 Oct 21
2
Trouble with password (daemon mode)
Hello.
I running rsync in daemon mode (rsync --daemon)
Everything seems to work well until I try to protect item with
password.
here is my /etc/rsyncd.conf :
use chroot = yes
max connections = 10
syslog facility = local5
[ftp]
path = /var/ftp
comment = ftp
secrets file = /etc/rsyncd.secrets
auth users = gate1
here is my /etc/rsyncd.secrets
gate1:abcdefg
Here
2012 Aug 02
1
Cache file list in daemon mode?
Hello. I suspect that what I want to do is not possible with rsync, but
this is the best place to double-check.
We are pushing files to a remote target that stores them on a very slow
network file system. There are also over a million files on the
target. Consequently, running rsync to push an update takes hours while
the remote side enumerates and stats all those files.
I thought, that
2011 Jun 28
2
rsync 3.0.6 and keep-dirlinks in daemon mode
Hello,
I'm trying to push some data from one machine to another via rsync
source machine uses rsync 3.0.8, it's a CentOS 5.6 Linux with rsync 3.0.8 package from rpmforge
destination machine uses rsync 3.0.6, it's a Scientific Linux 6.0 with rsync 3.0.6 from its repository
destination machine is running a rsync daemon with the following configuration:
log file = /var/log/rsyncd.log
2007 Dec 04
4
remote logging non-daemon mode
Greetings all. Due to security concerns we are switching our backup
processes from "SSH tunnel to rsync daemon" to "Running rsync over ssh
in --server mode". In daemon mode we had a nice conglomerate log file
of all of the backups that ran. Now that I am tweaking the scripts to
run over --server mode I see that by default there is no remote
logging. From what I have read on
2005 Jan 03
2
[Bug 2207] Listing of available sync-sets is very different with and without daemon mode
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2207
wayned@samba.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
Summary|Listing of available sync- |Listing of available sync-
2009 May 14
2
rsync 3.0.6 ACLs under MacOS 10.4
Have a functional rsync 3.0.6 server but am having troubles preserving
permissions from source to destination.
On server, rsyncd.conf looks like this (modules are defined but not listed
below):
cat /etc/rsyncd.conf
secrets file = /etc/rsyncd.secrets
read only = no
list = yes
uid = root
gid = wheel
On client am using -ApXrvvhog option and here are some errors am getting:
rsync: pack_smb_acl
2011 Oct 24
1
rsync connection/transfer error
Hi All,
I am somewhat new to rsync and am looking for some guidance. I've been using
it successfully for a couple months syncing CentOS updates from a university
mirror with the following specs:
rsync version 2.6.8 protocol version 29
rsync -artv rsync://mirrors.usc.edu/centos/5.6/updates/i386/RPMS/--exclude=debug/
/var/www/html/centos/5/updates/i386
Everything works fine for this connection
2013 Oct 02
2
unknown message 0:0 [sender]
hi all,
running a transfer from a rsync client (3.0.6) to a rsync server (3.1.0),
I get the following message:
$ RSYNC_PASSWORD="oooo" rsync -avn --delete /xx/yy/ rsync://
aaa at bbb.com/ccc/ddd/
<<motd displayed>>
sending incremental file list
unknown message 0:0 [sender]
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(436)
[sender=3.0.6]
Server logs
2015 Feb 27
2
rsync hangs on select() system call
hello,
trying to understand why a rsync client hangs during a transfer. Hopefully
someone can advise.
client = rsync 3.0.6, server = rsync 3.1.1 , transfer is done to a rsync
module with such a command:
rsync -rtxvvv my_data rsync://test at my.rsync.server/INCOMING/
<rsync://test at rsync.resif.fr/INCOMING_TEST/>
the client starts to transfer data (a few Mb) then hangs, then manually
2009 Aug 22
2
--xattrs requires protocol 30 or higher error
Hi there,
We are using rsync 3.0.6 on two identical SLES 10.2 servers. The
destination server is running rsyncd. When I include the -X switch in the
rsync command from the source I get the following:
--xattrs requires protocol 30 or higher (negotiated 29).
rsync error: protocol incompatibility (code 2) at compat.c(205)
[sender=3.0.6]
Both rsync versions are 3.0.6 protocol version 30.
Any
2004 Jan 19
1
daemon mode - local to server sync failing
I have an rsync server running on nodeA and a client, nodeB.
I am attempting to do a sync/copy from the local machine, nodeB, to the rsync server, nodeA.
The following line from the rsync man page makes it look like this is relatively simple:
for copying from the local machine to a remote rsync server. This is invoked when the destination path contains a :: separator or a rsync:// URL.
I have
2004 Jan 05
1
Daemon-mode authentication documentation
I have found reference a couple of places on the web describing the
details of authentication when rsync'ing with the server in
daemon/non-shell mode. For example:
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=6508
"rsync's authentication mechanism, available only when run in d?mon
mode, is based on a reasonably strong 128-bit MD5 challenge-response
scheme. This is superior to