similar to: how to best import Evolution/Thunderbird mail into dovecot?

I feel like I'm going totally crazy. Is it just me, or have embedded From_ lines really been breaking mbox messages since (at least) dovecot 1.0? I found a whole lot of broken messages in an old mailbox of mine and when I looked closer at it, it seemed like Dovecot was ignoring the Content-Length header and truncating the messages at the first embedded From_ line instead. Figuring

Sorry, couldn't find this in the archives. Under freebsd 4.x, the native mail.local that sendmail uses by default writes From_ lines that include the origin address. This is very readily parsable and handy for quick greps in mboxes. But deliver defaults it to MAILER-DAEMON. I see you can specify the envelope From_ with "-f", but I'm not sure how that's useful. Also

I just upgraded our test server from rc6 to rc10... ISSUE #1 I noticed that we no longer are getting two "From_" lines. However, the one that was good (had the original sender e-mail address) is now gone. The one with "dovecot.deliver" remains. I attempted to add "-d test" to the mailbox_command line in main.cf as follows: mailbox_command =

Hello, I was asking what was the motivation for not having the envelope From in the Maildir format, as defined in the qmail spec : "The message is delivered without an extra UUCP- style From_ line, without any >From quoting, and without an extra blank line at the end." which may sound silly since we lose an important piece of information. Same question about the motivation in

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > Behalf Of Nicolas Kovacs > Sent: den 3 november 2016 06:59 > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] Thunderbird vs. Evolution vs. OwnCloud > > I'm currently using Thunderbird synced to OwnCloud on my main > workstation running Slackware64 14.1. I just

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > Behalf Of Nicolas Kovacs > Sent: den 3 november 2016 09:16 > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Thunderbird vs. Evolution vs. OwnCloud > > Le 03/11/2016 ? 08:41, Sorin Srbu a ?crit : > > I use Thunderbird exclusively on my linux-systems. >

Le 03/11/2016 ? 08:41, Sorin Srbu a ?crit : > I use Thunderbird exclusively on my linux-systems. > I also feel the Lightning-addin for calendars in T-bird needs "some" work to > be usable. > > While I don't use my Owncloud for mail, only used as a cloud storage, I have > however used Evolution. In that context Evolution with CentOS sucks. It's just >

I have a Asterisk PBX System with Redhat Linux Fedora 4, Webmin version 1.400 and I am simply trying to configure into the "Extensions.conf" script an entry that will add to the "Auto-Attendant" a line that will allow a "Caller" to enter a "0" (Zero) will then ring the extension(s) of the "Operator" to speak directly with the "OPERATOR"

Background is that I have been using Evolution for my MUA for a number of years. Migrated to Evolution from Mozilla Mail. I only use Evolution for email and contacts. Getting bored with the issues (frequently not being able to exit and needing to kill it; Bug Buddy popping up in GNOME, etc) that Mark (MHR) and I and I'm sure others have experienced. About 24 hours ago, I installed

Evolution prompted to accept the cert; which I did. Thunderbird used to prompt and allow acceptance; it no longer does... well sorta does. See my other posting for a screenshot where it shows "add server location https:// ...." HTTPS . no way to add from SMTP. Have also tried typing smtp://host:25 and https://host:25 On 4/30/20 5:39 PM, Joseph Tam wrote: > On Thu, 30 Apr 2020,

After recently adding the -f parameter to the call to the deliver command which is called by Postfix, I found that e-mail with a null return path (MAIL FROM:<>) was causing Dovecot deliver to SEGFAULT. I verified this by making this patch to deliver.c (notice I fixed a typo here, too): *** deliver.c.orig Fri Oct 13 07:32:28 2006 --- deliver.c Fri Oct 27 21:26:08 2006 ***************

Hi, I'm currently using Thunderbird synced to OwnCloud on my main workstation running Slackware64 14.1. I just installed CentOS 7 on my Asus S300 laptop. It's running nicely, and I'm spending some time getting acquainted with it. I wonder if I should stick with Thunderbird or go with the default Evolution application, since this seems to be better integrated into the desktop, namely

Hi, does anyone know about a plugin that allows dialling a contact from the phonebook of evolution or T-bird? -- Alexander Topolanek http://www.topolanek.at

<!doctype html> <html><head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> </head><body><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>On 30/04/2020 14:49 <a href="mailto:hanasaki@gmail.com">hanasaki@gmail.com</a> <<a href="mailto:hanasaki@gmail.com">hanasaki@gmail.com</a>>

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > Behalf Of Nicolas Kovacs > Sent: den 3 november 2016 09:51 > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Thunderbird vs. Evolution vs. OwnCloud > > Le 03/11/2016 ? 09:31, Sorin Srbu a ?crit : > > Something like this maybe? > > > >

On Thu, 30 Apr 2020, hanasaki at gmail.com wrote: >>> Apr 8 18:10:18 hh dovecot: imap-login: Debug: SSL error: SSL_accept() >>> failed: error:14094412:SSL routines:ssl3_read_bytes:sslv3 alert bad >>> certificate: SSL alert number 42 According to this

<!doctype html> <html><head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> </head><body><div>I see. You need to import the cert into thundebird's trusted ca certs.</div><div><br></div><div>Aki</div><blockquote type="cite"><div>On 30/04/2020 21:36 <a

I'm trying to mark several hundred thousand messages as read as they are delivered via dovecot-lda(1). (I'm importing some mail from another format for migration purposes.) I've been able to do this with Sieve, but it has the side effect that the messages' received and saved dates are set to the current date, and Apple Mail (at least) uses one of these to display the message date.

(Using dovecot 1.0 RC7 on Fedora Core 5) <scene set> Hitherto we have used UW-IMAP on a "farm" of Linux machines mounting NFS from a NetApp. (The UW-IMAP author doesn't like use of NFS, but with careful use of NFS mount arguments ('noac,actimeo=0' etc.) and trying to ensure that all activity for a given user takes place within one machine in the farm, we seem to

I'm trying both Evolution and Thunderbird on my IMAP server, and find that there are differences in how some things are done, between clients. Shouldn't there have been a standard way to do these things in the IMAP protocol? The first thing I noticed is that when deleting email from one client, it puts a "T" on the file name, leaving it where it is, and from the other client,