similar to: virtual networking - virbr0-nic interface

I am running Fedora 16 64bit and installed libvirt. I have the VM running with arm emulation with this one issue I can't figure out. I used Virtual Machine Manager to manage the VM and can access its console there. The Ethernet appears to be eth1 and the guest can set an IP on it etc. However, I cannot see any traffic from the Host when dumping any of the interfaces. I've tried

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi list, I searched the web for bug reports regarding this phenomenon I see on *multiple* machines of a customer, however, I didn't find an exact fit. So, I'd like to ask here whether anyone else has run into this. I have multiple CentOS 6 machines running using KVM to virtualize a bunch of machines on them (LVM-based). Software releases

Hey, I have KVM installed on my Fedora 17 box. I added the network interfaces of the virtual machines to the openvswitch bridge as follows: ____ ____ / VM1\______br0_______/ em1\ \____/ | \____/ | _|_ /VM2\ \____/ virbr0 is the virtual network switch VM1 and VM2 are on the same subnet having tap interfaces vnet0 and vnet1 respectively. em1 is the default

Currently, I have two networks configured via xml: virsh # net-dumpxml TestNetwork1 <network connections='2'> <name>TestNetwork1</name> <uuid>a76f665a-0196-4edb-81b4-340944a6869c</uuid> <forward dev='p1p1' mode='nat'> <nat> <port start='1024' end='65535'/> </nat> <interface

Greetings, I have two vms, one is a router and the other one is a client, for some reason, the client vm is unable get ip via dhcp from the router vm. here are outputs: vm1.xml: <interface type='bridge'> <mac address='52:54:00:54:78:be'/> <source bridge='virbr0'/> <model type='virtio'/> <address

I am running NOX controller with a python script that prints out the destination mac and the source mac for each packet arriving at the now controller and then floods it out. So here's what happening: With em1 connected, all the packets that arrive at em1 are coming to the controller and printing out the details. However, without em1 connected to the OVS, when I have the following setup:

Hi, I got this NOTE on most of the link. But I am not getting reason for this. Why someone should not add physical NIC to virbr0. I tried to add my eth1 to virbr0 and it get added. So whether it affects to some functionality of NAT network? -- Sagar Dilip Shedge, Pune. With Regards.

I've been trying to build a model cluster using three virtual machines on my home server. Each VM boots off its own dedicated partition (CentOS 7.3). One partition is designated to be the common /home partition for the VMs, (on the real machine it will mount as /cluster). I'm intending to run GFS2 on the shared partition, so I need to configure DLM and corosync. That's where I'm

Hi list! I would like to modernize my server at home which is still running Shorewall 3. The server will be running CentOS 6.2 but i also want to use KVM virtualization to run a Windows host on the same box that i can log in to remotely. I looked through the documentation samples on the shorewall site and found several bridging configurations but they do not match my setup, yes it will

Interested in bonding my 2 on board nics along with my add on card NIC for a total of 3. How would this work with the virtual machines? My eths/IPs ---> bond0, bond0:1, etc ---> ? ----> virbr0,virbr0:1 (each machine to have own IP address, one machine may have some virtual sites needing more than one ip, so multiple ips added to mix..) add something to the bond0 file, or just leave

I have CentOS 7 host. Two guests on bridge network setup by GUI and virt-manager. 1 CentOS 8 guest 1 Win 10 guest Both cannot access the host. They can other machines on the network. Guests can access the internet just not the host. I used virt-manager GUi to set up everything. Selected the eth0:macvtap and Bridge. I "desire" bridge network. If I select something else I get access to

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:05:19AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: >On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 02:26:59AM -0400, Travis S. Johnson wrote: >>Hello, >> >>I came across an interesting problem in my home lab a few weeks ago as I'm >>prepping for my RHCE exam using Michael Jang study guide. I've been at this >>for days now, and I still can't wrap my head around

Hi , I have two virtual machines VM1 and VM2. Then I have added eth0 of my VM to 'default' network. Use case :- I want to monitor all traffic on virbr0('default' network). Steps followed :- 1. Add VM1 eth0 to virbr0 2. Add VM2 eth1 to virbr0 3. brctl setageing ovsbr0 0 ..(To put bridge in promiscuous) Now I am running tcpdump on eth1 of VM2 and trying to ping

Hi, In my office I have an HP Proliant server running CentOS 7. It's a minimal install without GUI. The machine has two network interface cards, and for now it's acting as gateway/firewall, and it's running ntpd, Dnsmasq and Rsnapshot. I'd like this machine to also be a KVM virtualization host, so I installed qemu-kvm and libvirt. The interface facing the LAN is enp3s0, so I

Hello, I came across an interesting problem in my home lab a few weeks ago as I'm prepping for my RHCE exam using Michael Jang study guide. I've been at this for days now, and I still can't wrap my head around how two or more virtual networks in default NAT configuration are even allowed to communicate with each other despite what the libvirt documentation said. Here's the

On 11/12/2014 08:21 AM, Sagar Shedge wrote: > Hi, > > I got this NOTE on most of the link. But I am not getting reason for this. > Why someone should not add physical NIC to virbr0. Well, for a start, if you do that then the dhcp server that is running on virbr0 will be exposed to the physical network and begin answering DHCP requests from devices out in the real world. And then you

hello all, I have been trying to set-up bridged network with VLAN and not able to succeed as many tutorials address only single NIC. I am trying to setup 2 guests (backtrack instance) each guest has NIC1 and NIC2. following is snippet for guest1 I am not able to get 192.168.0.2 address back on guest eth0. VIRT-MANAGER GUI : guest1-lan details radio button left side panel NIC1

Just want to report an error in samba configuration / setup. I installed Samba 4 GA on a fresh installation of Ubuntu 12.04. The server is a testbed and has the virtualization package installed also. I have two network interfaces exept lo: eth0 and virbr0. In the provisioning step samba correctly finds my eth0 network interface: Looking up IPv4 addresses More than one IPv4 address found.

On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 2:49 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 02:27:44PM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 10:18 AM Pino Toscano <ptoscano@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > > > On Tuesday, 9 October 2018 20:16:04 CEST Nir Soffer wrote: > > > > I'm trying to build fedora-27 image for

in my case each ethernet must in UP status even it is a NAT network where is the point i can start its virt-ethernet when i start a NAT-network? thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/attachments/20130415/f6f464d6/attachment.htm>