similar to: toolchain vs linux

Is there a list of which kernel versions (are supposed to) work with (each version of) klibc? I do recall reading something that said klibc should run under any version of the kernel, regardless of which version it is compiled against. Following the new instructions on this list earlier (to use the KLIBCKERNELSRC= parameter to point to the installed kernel headers) as well as also making the

Now that I got klibc to build, the next step is to leanr what it takes to compile ... and most importantly, link ... a program with klibc. Past experience with the GNU toolchain tells me GCC will be a bit of a trouble maker in this, probably trying to make inappropriate library references that would work fine with glibc. I do not currently have any intent to make shared/dynamically linked

Are there any version compatibilities between linux and klibc? I tried to compile the latest klibc (1.5.18) with the latest linux (2.6.32.15) and there is miserable compile failures. It looks like klibc wants some headers to be in include/asm (linked in my case to include/asm-x86) but they are instead in include/asm-generic (it seems all headers but one are in there). I put together this script

Last year I put together a script that did a combined kernel header export from a pristine kernel tarball, then a build of klibc from a pristine klibc tarball. One of the intentions for this was to be independent of the host kernel and its headers, so I could build klibc for other targets of the same architecture. I even did this for a wide range of klibc and kernel version combinations to see

Hello list. I wonder how I can make clang use specific linker. I am now trying to compile a hello world c code on an Ubuntu box for ARM and X86. And I have successfully built for ARM but NOT ABLE TO build one for X86. I am using a cross toolchain in the scratchbox environment of Tizen SDK. You can refer to the url below for my testing environment.

I re-wrote the compile script to build klibc (cleaning up how I do it, and how to find the source tarballs). It seems to be compiling fine. I tried several of the commands in usr/utils/static and most one. However, the sleep command fails in a strange way (EINVAL on execve): ================================================================ faraday/phil /home/phil/klibc-project-0 581> strace

Hi There, I am trying to build a cross-compiler for an architecture with MIPS like ISA. To begin with, I built a toolchain for MIPSr2 which uses: Clang-3.1 for preprocessing, compiling, optimizing; Binutils-2.22 for assembling and linking; Newlib-1.20.0 as the standard C library implementation. I modified the Clang Driver to use the correct binutils tools and linker scripts. Compiling Newlib with

Le 25/03/2019 à 14:41, Peter Smith a écrit : > Hello David, > > I don't know much about the specifics of Musl, so I'm responding generally. > > As I understand it, clang expects to find the compiler-rt libraries > relative to the resource directory, which you can find out the > location of with clang --print-resource-dir . By default it is > lib/clang/9.0.0

-----Original Message----- From: Robin Getz [mailto:rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org] Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 12:11 AM To: Michael Shatz Cc: speex-dev@xiph.org Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Blackfin inline assembler and VisualDSP++ toolchain >On Wed 13 Jun 2007 12:37, Michael Shatz pondered: >> >> Hi Jean-Marc >> >> I'm trying to integrate your speex codec on our

An updated toolchain is now being used for Windows' builds of R-devel: details are in the R-admin manual and at http://www.murdoch-sutherland.com/Rtools/ and http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/Rtools/ Both 32- and 64-bit parts of the toolchain use v2.0.1 of the Mingw-w64 project's runtime and a beta of gcc 4.5.4: the Mingw.org project's builds are no longer used. This should mean that

+ Denis and Galina who should know about the affected buildbots and whether it's fine to upgrade them or whether their configurations reflect some important use cases. Sylvestre should know if the release process for LLVM on Ubuntu/Debian relies on the older GCC toolchains somehow. On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:51 PM Roman Lebedev via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hmm,

> Virtually all. As far as I could test, all major architectures > (v4/v5/v6 + v7-A-R-M), although I'm still fighting with some Thumb > code generation. Not a big issue for me: targets are ARMv4 (ARM7) and ARMv5 (ARM9) "classic" CPUs - in ARM terminology. No cortex. > I haven't tested dragonegg, but clang and llvm-gcc do the job. > llvm-gcc seems to be more in

I get this error: ============================================================================= KLIBCCC usr/kinit/resume.o usr/kinit/resume.c:15:66: linux/config.h: No such file or directory make[2]: *** [usr/kinit/resume.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make: *** [klibc] Error 2 ============================================================================= There is no linux/config.h in

The MinGW-w64 project, whose toolchains we use for 64-bit Windows, have made some changes to their conventions *and* removed all the older binary builds from their site. The current toolchains are not suitable for use with R 2.11.x, and I've re-packaged an older version (which is) as http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/Rtools/oldWin64toolchain.zip The most critical change is to no longer have

Hello, Emmanuel > I'm used to build GCC (4.x) toolchains with newlib, but how can I do > the same with llvm-gcc ? Pretty much same way as with gcc. E.g. via --with-newlib, etc. > It seems that clang attemps to find the header files from the host > system dir, not from the target system dir, so I guess that I missed > an important option ... somewhere. clang is not pretty well

tags 618616 pending stop On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, Lo?c Minier wrote: > I've fixed this in Ubuntu with the attached patch, but didn't find > where to upstream it; since you're a klibc upstream developer and since > it probably already affects Debian, I figured it was probably best to > send it here :-) thank you applied after review by hpa and pushed out to klibc git.

On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 at 18:47, Nicholas Wilson via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I was going to wait until Neil Trevett got back to me about becoming a > SPIR-V TSG advisor but this seems like just as good an opportunity. Please > see the previous discussion [1] if you have not already, there were many > relevant points made. > > First, I’d like to note

Hello, Since 2015 Khronos has switched to the new portable intermediate format SPIR-V, which has replaced the original SPIR. The advantage is that it offers higher portability across different toolchains. There was a talk about it at a Dev Meeting: http://llvm.org/devmtg/2017-03//2017/02/20/accepted-sessions.html#17 LLVM currently only supports SPIR format for OpenCL in Clang. Several Khronos

>> I'm used to build GCC (4.x) toolchains with newlib, but how can I do >> the same with llvm-gcc ? > Pretty much same way as with gcc. E.g. via --with-newlib, etc. I successfully built llvm+clang, but it seems that the newlib library files have neither been compiled nor installed. With GCC (at the time 4.5.2), the build steps are straightforward: newlib/ and libgloss/

Hi Jean-Marc I'm trying to integrate your speex codec on our custom Blackfin board. The board is not uCLinux compatible and there is no chance that it will ever be. I am using ADI-supplied VisualDSP++ IDE and corresponding toolchain. As long as I am compiling "C"-only version of the library everything is fine. VisualDSP++ produces working library. There is only one not so minor