similar to: arch/ia64/pipe.c:5:23: syscommon.h: No such file or directory

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "arch/ia64/pipe.c:5:23: syscommon.h: No such file or directory"

2004 Oct 16
1
0.184 -- gcc: warning: `-x c' after last input file has no effect
What do I need to do to fix this? [jonsmirl@smirl klibc-0.184]$ make make[1]: Entering directory `/home/dri/klibc-0.184/klibc' gcc -Wp,-MT,syscalls.nrs,-MD,./.syscalls.nrs.d -mregparm=3 -DREGPARM=3 -march=i386 -Os -g -falign-functions=0 -falign-jumps=0 -falign-loops=0 -nostdinc -iwithprefix include -D__KLIBC__ -DBITSIZE=32 -I../include/arch/i386 -I../include/bits32 -I../include
2005 Jan 19
1
build klibc with gcc 2.96 fails
I get the following error: make[1]: Entering directory `/home/greg/src/klibc/klibc-0.196/klibc' gcc -Wp,-MT,__static_init.o,-MD,./.__static_init.o.d -march=i386 -Os -g -malign-functions=0 -malign-jumps=0 -malign-loops=0 -nostdinc -iwithprefix include -D__KLIBC__ -DBITSIZE=32 -I.. /include/arch/i386 -I../include/bits32 -I../include -I../linux/include -I../linux/include2 -I ../linux/include
2005 Feb 25
1
klibc wrapper
Hi I've managed to compile klibc 0.198 and run the hello world program. How can I compile my own program? Can someone give an example or provide a simple wrapper program for doing this? like uclibc did with their earlier versions. I looked at the make process and did a bit reading and figure out this much: gcc -Wp,[preprocessor options] -MT,[target_name_I_think] tests/hello.o,
2019 Sep 12
0
Fwd: Launchpad [Bug 1843743] [NEW] klibc ftbfs in eoan
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Matthias Klose <doko at ubuntu.com> Message-ID: <156829951299.6967.9341353260688596797.malonedeb at soybean.canonical.com> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 14:45:12 -0000 Subject: [Bug 1843743] [NEW] klibc ftbfs in eoan Reply-To: Bug 1843743 <1843743 at bugs.launchpad.net> Public bug reported:
2004 Oct 19
1
times.h and building ash
I get this with current linus bk now and klibc 187 [jonsmirl@smirl ash]$ make sh mknodes.sh nodetypes nodes.c.pat . gcc -Wp,-MD,.cd.d -mregparm=3 -DREGPARM=3 -march=i386 -Os -g -falign-functions=0 -falign-jumps=0 -falign-loops=0 -nostdinc -iwithprefix include -D__KLIBC__ -DBITSIZE=32 -I../include/arch/i386 -I../include/bits32 -I../include -I../linux/include -I../linux/include2 -I../linux/include
2013 Dec 27
0
[PATCH] Update header locations for uapi & generated
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 08:31:48PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > In the end, demanding that I use a copy of the installed kernel headers, > > when I'm passing a specific kernel source to the klibc build and that > > kernel source is most probably not the same as the kernel that's running > > seems like a bad idea. I want to build against a known kernel source,
2019 Oct 14
0
Fwd: [Bug 1843743] Re: klibc ftbfs in eoan
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Adam Conrad <adconrad at 0c3.net> Message-ID: <157106879908.15546.2658970073129703906.malone at soybean.canonical.com> 2.0.7-1 fails to build in the same way on Ubuntu 19.10. I'm assuming it's either glibc 2.30 (Debian is at 2.29) or linux 5.3 (Debian is at 5.2), with the latter being more likely. -- You received this bug
2019 Oct 21
0
Fwd: [Bug 1843743] Re: klibc ftbfs in eoan
Hrm, perhaps adding the flag (or the matching __attribute__) only to where it is needed makes sense? --mirabilos ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Adam Conrad <adconrad at 0c3.net> Message-ID: <157169641305.9361.4432909657455952189.malone at soybean.canonical.com> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 22:20:12 -0000 Subject: [Bug 1843743] Re: klibc ftbfs in eoan Reply-To: Bug 1843743
2005 Feb 07
2
tiny patch for klibc 0.198
Hi folks, attached you can find a tiny patch for klibc-0.198 to get rid of the symbolic link pointing to the kernel sources, and to get rid of some obsolete rebuilds during incremental. Feel free to include it. Regards Harri -------------- next part -------------- diff -ur old/klibc-0.198/MCONFIG klibc-0.198/MCONFIG --- old/klibc-0.198/MCONFIG 2004-10-14 06:32:24.000000000 +0200 +++
2013 Dec 27
2
[PATCH] Update header locations for uapi & generated
On 12/26/2013 07:27 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > (please CC me, I'm not on the klibc list, and I didn't get HPA's > response to my post). > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 12:24:34AM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >> H. Peter Anvin dixit: >>> You should be using the output of "make headers_install" to build klibc. > That makes easy cross-building a
2004 Oct 16
1
181 and current Linus
klibc appears to build ok, some of the apps fail gcc -Wp,-MD,.fstype.d -mregparm=3 -DREGPARM=3 -march=i386 -Os -g -falign-functions=0 -falign-jumps=0 -falign-loops=0 -nostdinc -iwithprefix include -D__KLIBC__ -DBITSIZE=32 -I../include/arch/i386 -I../include/bits32 -I../include -I../linux/include -I../linux/include2 -W -Wall -c -o fstype.o fstype.c fstype.c: In function `romfs_image':
2005 Jan 27
1
klibc/ash doesn't compile
Hi, on my system the klibc/ash ( 0.197 ) doesn't compile: [ghigo@therra ash]$ pwd /home/ghigo/klibc/klibc-0.197/ash [ghigo@therra ash]$ make [...] gcc -Wp,-MD,.arith_lex.d -mregparm=3 -DREGPARM=3 -march=i386 -Os -g -falign-functions=0 -falign-jumps=0 -falign-loops=0 -nostdinc -iwithprefix include -D__KLIBC__ -DBITSIZE=32 -I../include/arch/i386 -I../include/bits32 -I../include
2011 Jul 19
4
[PATCH v1 0/2] Support dropping of capabilities from early userspace.
This patchset applies to klibc mainline. As is it will probably collide with Maximilian's recent patch to rename run-init to switch_root posted last week. To boot an untrusted environment with certain capabilities locked out, we'd like to be able to drop the capabilities up front from early userspace, before we actually transition onto the root volume. This patchset implements this by
2003 Nov 24
1
[PATCH] fix pipe() for ia64
Pipe's a strange syscall. Here is a fix for ia64. mh -- Martin Hicks Wild Open Source Inc. mort@wildopensource.com 613-266-2296 # This is a BitKeeper generated patch for the following project: # Project Name: The kernel C library # This patch format is intended for GNU patch command version 2.5 or higher. # This patch includes the following deltas: #
2003 Oct 15
2
link failure in snapshot 0.81
Im using snapshot 0.81. make[1]: Entering directory `/home/rogelio/src/klibc-0.81/klibc' gcc -Wp,-MD,./.getenvtest.d -march=i386 -Os -falign-functions=0 -falign-jumps=0 -falign-loops=0 -nostdinc -iwithprefix include -I../klibc -I../klibc/arch/i386/include -I../klibc/include/bits32 -D__KLIBC__ -DBITSIZE=32 -I../klibc/include -I../linux/include -W -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings
2005 Jul 30
3
kbuild updates to klibc
Hi Peter & others. Here are three patches that does the following: #1 - Update kbuild part of klibc so make clean works Adds gzip including a sample kbuild file #2 - Factor out definition of usr/ to two variables #3 - Move kbuild files to reflect location in the kernel As requested in earlier mail I need a bit of guidiance of what you expect from the kernel integrated parts of klibc.
2009 Sep 15
1
[PATCH] add linux' arch/$ARCH/include to search path From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 17:46:47 +0100
with the recent move of the includes from linux' include/asm-$ARCH to arch/$ARCH/asm, klibc fails to compile, because the in-linux-header files include from asm/, but this is not in the header search path. e.g. against linux-2.6.27 arm: arm-iwmmx-linux-gnueabi-gcc -Wp,-MD,usr/klibc/.vsnprintf.o.d -nostdinc -iwithprefix include -Iusr/include/arch/arm -Iusr/include/bits32
2003 Nov 26
1
[PATCH] use 2.6 module syscalls in klibc
I had a klibc build failure (on s390) because of include/sys/module.h and noticed that it still has the old system call interface for 2.4 style modutils. Is there any reason to keep that in klibc? This patch fixes the build problem by removing the old file and also makes it possible to build module-init-tools (after some tweaking there) against klibc. Arnd <>< =====
2002 Dec 23
1
klibc insmod for recent kernels
--9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline I stripped down the insmod command from modules-init-tools for use with klibc. Rusty agreed to have this contributed to klibc. The second patch removes old style modules support. -- ciao, Marco --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment;
2012 May 15
5
[PATCH 0/5] resubmitting pending patches
Hi, I?ve gone through the mailing list archives and hereby want to resubmit my pending patches. Most are independent of each other, except the m68k patch which will only be complete if sigsuspend is also fixed. (It can be applied before that, though.) http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/klibc/2012-January/003173.html [PATCH] fix m68k support Resubmitted here as 0005. While there was a question from