similar to: initramfs as an initrd replacement

Last patch for now. This gets gen_init_cpio into a state where it can pick up a "kinit" binary from usr and stuff it into the cpio archive as /sbin/init. This is obviously a crock, but it suffices for testing until something sane is done about integrating klibc into the kernel tree. The patch also adds a bit of instrumentation to initramfs.c, to try to help flush out bug 740.

I tried building with linux-2.6.0-test7 build dies with: make[1]: Entering directory `/home/rogelio/src/klibc-0.80/klibc' gcc -Wp,-MD,./.fork.d -march=i386 -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -malign-functions=0 -malign-jumps=0 -malign-loops=0 -nostdinc -iwithprefix include -I../klibc -I../klibc/arch/i386/include -I../klibc/include/bits32 -D__KLIBC__ -DBITSIZE=32 -I../klibc/include

Hi all I'm trying to boot with initramfs I build my own root fs, and the kernel build links it, I have double checked this when the kernel boots unpack_to_rootfs() returns no error, so it continues and .... when It tries to mount the rootfs it tries to mount from an IDE device (where the kernel was built from), and not from the initramfs "image" I think this is not documented

Another post-2.5.68 one. The cramfs header defines u8, so we must quiet it down. <b diff -Nru a/utils/fstype.c b/utils/fstype.c --- a/utils/fstype.c Mon Apr 28 15:10:56 2003 +++ b/utils/fstype.c Mon Apr 28 15:10:56 2003 @@ -19,7 +19,9 @@ #include <asm/byteorder.h> #include <linux/romfs_fs.h> +#define __KERNEL__ #include <linux/cramfs_fs.h> +#undef __KERNEL__ #include

Hi, Andrew - Looks like a recent change you fed to Linus broke the klibc build as of 2.5.71. Can you pass this fix along, please? ===== include/linux/bitops.h 1.4 vs edited ===== --- 1.4/include/linux/bitops.h Thu Jun 5 23:37:30 2003 +++ edited/include/linux/bitops.h Sat Jun 14 22:02:01 2003 @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ return (res & 0x0F) + ((res >> 4) & 0x0F); }

Hi hpa and others. With my ongoing work to prepare for potential integration of klibc in the kernel I wonder if there wold be any interest in using part of the kbuild infrastructure to build the vanilla klibc? The rationale is obvious: - common codebase for Kbuild files, so one only has to fix things in one place - I force klibc developers to create Kbuild files usable in the kernel - Much

Hi I am looking at inserting functions in the early user space and want to use initramfs for this. I understand this can be achieved using 'initrd' or by making changes in the 'usr/gen_init_cpio.c' file. Can someone kindly give me pointers as to how to go about this. I am looking at the 2.6.x kernel. Thanks Rachita.

Hi, Greg - I have a 2.5.70 BK repository, with klibc integrated, at: bk://klibc.bkbits.net/2.5-klibc This repo has the following features: * Completely up-to-date w.r.t. klibc itself. * Kbuild sort of happy, but still needs an eyeball from Kai to figure out why it always rebuilds everything in usr/. * Supports both IP autoconfig and NFS root from initramfs.

This patch series allows user-specified mount commands to be sent in via kernel command line ("kinit_mount=...") or via an embedded /etc/fstab file. The first patch is a cleanup of a patch sent last November by San Mehat (http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/EazJNBMORV2U7E0coh5h); the next two are small improvements or bug fixes.

Hi, when mounting an intentionally corrupted btrfs filesystem i get the following warning and bug message. The image can be found here www.cccmz.de/~snakebyte/btrfs.2.img.bck.bz2 [ 297.406152] device fsid e14cf01de423381a-4bd40b603870018a <6>devid 2147483649 transid 9 /dev/loop0 [ 297.411937] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 297.412207] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:805

Hello all- I'm very new to the whole idea of booting a machine from a network server, so please go easy on me until I can get my head wrapped around it all. I have a boot image that I want to be able to serve over the wire to client machines. I have a kernel and a file system image that I've put on a USB stick, and it boots fine from there. However, I have something strange happening

On 4/16/06, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > > I've put the pre-release tar balls here: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/1.7/ > The build failed on i686-pc-linux-gnu. llvm[2]: Flexing FileLexer.l llvm[2]: Compiling FileLexer.cpp for Release build /home/rogelio/Desktop/llvm/utils/TableGen/FileLexer.l: In function 'int Filelex()':

I''m trying to emulate the mongrel_cluster_ctl but it takes a -c conf_file option... meaning I can run it from anywhere as long as I tell it where the conf file is. Merb doesn''t have that capability does it? (it has an additional/supplemental config like mup.conf etc) Do I have to be under the merb_app root /path/to/merb/app/ to be able to run merb? Let me know. Thanks,

The following patchset implements 3 seperate series of changes. External Building ================= Patches 1 through 8 enable to use of klibc's build system while leaving the src tree pristine (and potentially read only). Specifically: - srctree=<Sources for klibc> - objtree=<Ouput directory for klibc> - KLIBCKERNELSRC=<Kernel sources> - KLIBCKERNELOBJ=<Kernel

Just wanted to try domU freebsd and found <http://216.239.59.104/search?q=cache:M_4r1b-RG- EJ:www.fsmware.com/xenofreebsd/5.3/xenbsdsetup.txt&hl=en&lr=&strip=1> but the webservice on www.fsmware.com seems to be down/unavailable. Any mirror? Or other working FreeBSD domU-kernels & images? Regards, /nils. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing

Various coding style fixes checkpatch warns about. The goal is not to be 100% checkpatch compliant, but to have more consistent coding style. As this is a trivial patch serie, will land in 24 hours in klibc git, unless of course ml review hits a bugger. Checked with size(3) that the generated kinit, fstype, ipconfig and nfsmount are the same. maximilian attems (4): [klibc] ipconfig: reduce

Hi, I just saw this thread. I work on llvm at Xilinx but I do not work on microblaze. I will check to see if there is any interest here at Xilinx to contribute resources to the maintenance of this backend. Thanks, Jeff On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Rogelio Serrano <rogelio.serrano at gmail.com>wrote: > > On Feb 6, 2013 4:52 AM, "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at

I''m having an issue with ARsessions... I have a rails app AND a merb app both under the same domain... I have redirects working for this to be seamless... however, the session started on merb is different than the session started in the rails app... like so.. http://pastie.caboo.se/private/r1ar42qiaekrqjdt6y Any ideas why? The only difference I see, but dunno where to change this, is

Hi, I've been using PxeLinux to boot our Debian kernel successfully for some time now. I recently increased the size of the ramdisk from about 484 MBs to 517 MBs and encountered the following error during bootup: --- RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0 Freeing initrd memory: 105519k EXT3-fs: Magic mismatch, very weird! cramfs: wrong magic sh-2021: reiserfs_read_super: can not find

I've put the pre-release tar balls here: http://llvm.org/prereleases/1.7/ I'm asking for help to test this release and to review documentation. If anyone can spare some time to help out, I would really appreciate it. The more people that test, the better this release will be. Secondly, now that the tarballs have been created, everyone is free to check in documentation changes into the