similar to: [PATCH] Make syscall stub generators better world citizens

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "[PATCH] Make syscall stub generators better world citizens"

2013 Oct 18
0
[LLVMdev] Downstream distributions as first class citizens in the LLVM repository
<snip /> May I just add a few points 1) Won't get rid of forks - ever.. forget it 2) Branches are "free" - having a single branch for dumping things is unlikely to suit the needs of all the work by everyone 3) Having things consolidated in one more or less easy to find place is better than all over the damn place. ------------ I'd vote to give FBSD and anyone
2013 Oct 19
0
[LLVMdev] Downstream distributions as first class citizens in the LLVM repository
On Oct 18, 2013, at 7:07 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 06:47:51AM +0700, "C. Bergstr?m" wrote: >> <snip /> >> >> May I just add a few points >> >> 1) Won't get rid of forks - ever.. forget it >> 2) Branches are "free" - having a single branch for dumping things is >>
2013 Oct 18
0
[LLVMdev] Downstream distributions as first class citizens in the LLVM repository
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 07:09:47PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > Hi all, > I mentioned this idea yesterday on IRC already and would like to discuss > in the greater context of the mailing list. NetBSD is about to import > LLVM and Clang into its repository; FreeBSD already has done that a > while ago. This creates some interesting maintainance questions. FreeBSD > has
2013 Oct 19
1
[LLVMdev] Downstream distributions as first class citizens in the LLVM repository
On 19 Oct 2013, at 04:37, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > I agree. I don't see how a concept of "official vendor branches" is better than the concept of "stable" branches that take bugfixes. I think it would be simple and work well to just have vendors ask to get patches merged into 3.3.x or 3.4.x (whichever they are based on) stabilization
2013 Oct 19
2
[LLVMdev] Downstream distributions as first class citizens in the LLVM repository
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 06:47:51AM +0700, "C. Bergstr?m" wrote: > <snip /> > > May I just add a few points > > 1) Won't get rid of forks - ever.. forget it > 2) Branches are "free" - having a single branch for dumping things is > unlikely to suit the needs of all the work by everyone I think that having a single stable branch would be the most
2013 Oct 18
0
[LLVMdev] Downstream distributions as first class citizens in the LLVM repository
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 01:07:49AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 06:47:55PM -0400, Tom Stellard wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 07:09:47PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > I mentioned this idea yesterday on IRC already and would like to discuss > > > in the greater context of the mailing list. NetBSD is about
2013 Oct 18
2
[LLVMdev] Downstream distributions as first class citizens in the LLVM repository
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 06:47:55PM -0400, Tom Stellard wrote: > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 07:09:47PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > Hi all, > > I mentioned this idea yesterday on IRC already and would like to discuss > > in the greater context of the mailing list. NetBSD is about to import > > LLVM and Clang into its repository; FreeBSD already has done that a >
2013 Oct 18
3
[LLVMdev] Downstream distributions as first class citizens in the LLVM repository
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 07:28:28PM -0400, Tom Stellard wrote: > On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 01:07:49AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 06:47:55PM -0400, Tom Stellard wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 07:09:47PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I mentioned this idea yesterday on IRC already and would like
2013 Oct 18
4
[LLVMdev] Downstream distributions as first class citizens in the LLVM repository
Hi all, I mentioned this idea yesterday on IRC already and would like to discuss in the greater context of the mailing list. NetBSD is about to import LLVM and Clang into its repository; FreeBSD already has done that a while ago. This creates some interesting maintainance questions. FreeBSD has followed the LLVM/Clang releases and backported various fixes locally. NetBSD will after the 3.4 release
2003 Oct 13
5
initramfs as an initrd replacement
Hi , One of the things I am working on requires me to have a kernel and an initrd (as root filesystem , based on busybox) in one single image. I am trying to use initramfs for this, but there are a few things that I just can't figure out. As a test, I made a cpio archive of my own for the kernel source (plain 2.6.0-test5). Everything gets unpacked just fine during boot. Somehow I was
2007 Oct 28
4
A better way to stub out constants
Hi Something that''s gnawing at me... to avoid using the SQLite3 gem I''m stubbing it out like this: before(:each) do @database = mock("SQLite3 database") SQLite3 = Module.new SQLite3::Database = Class.new SQLite3::Database.stub!(:new).and_return(@database) end But then it keeps nagging me:
2003 Jun 14
1
[teeny tiny PATCH] Fix include/linux/bitops.h for userspace
Hi, Andrew - Looks like a recent change you fed to Linus broke the klibc build as of 2.5.71. Can you pass this fix along, please? ===== include/linux/bitops.h 1.4 vs edited ===== --- 1.4/include/linux/bitops.h Thu Jun 5 23:37:30 2003 +++ edited/include/linux/bitops.h Sat Jun 14 22:02:01 2003 @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ return (res & 0x0F) + ((res >> 4) & 0x0F); }
2005 Jul 27
2
Introduce kbuild for klibc?
Hi hpa and others. With my ongoing work to prepare for potential integration of klibc in the kernel I wonder if there wold be any interest in using part of the kbuild infrastructure to build the vanilla klibc? The rationale is obvious: - common codebase for Kbuild files, so one only has to fix things in one place - I force klibc developers to create Kbuild files usable in the kernel - Much
2003 May 20
0
patch for better handling of write failures (disk full)
I've been having problems trying to sync two small partitions (128MB) that may be near to full. If rsync gets a write error (such as is caused when you fill up a partition) during a sync without the use of "-T", it will stop with this error: rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4 bytes: phase "unknown": Broken pipe rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream
2003 May 23
1
PATCH: better handling for write failures (disk full)
[I sent this the other day, but it never got approved for the list] I've been having problems trying to sync two small partitions (128MB) that are usually near being full. The rsync would fail with this cryptic error: rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4 bytes: phase "unknown": Broken pipe rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(515) It ends up
2013 Jan 10
1
how to generate a matrix by an my data.frame
Dear All It is a little hard to give a good small example of my question,so I will show the full data on the bottom and the attachment.Maybe some one could tell me an appropriate way to show it.I'm sorry for the inconvenience. Q:How to generate a 53*53 diagonal matrix by my data Some problems confused me are that: 1.Since it is a diagonal matrix,I have tried to transform col1 and col2 to
2016 Nov 16
1
Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) is Looking for Information Technology-related Job Opportunities World Wide
Dear Sir/Madam, My academic and educational qualifications are now reflected in my email signature. I am an entry level/junior/beginner Information Technology (IT) Specialist/Systems Engineer/Linux Server Administrator/Helpdesk Support/Computer Technician available for hire anywhere in the world!!! Prospective employers, businesses and companies in any part of the world please feel free to
2015 Apr 28
0
hi list need your help
facing problem with originating webrtc calls 1-when iam doing call from webrtc iget ice working <--- SIP read from WS:91.196.158.205:1466 ---> INVITE sip:0669197533 at 77.91.132.9 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/WS 7cvtd9ihs2e8.invalid;branch=z9hG4bK8749315 Max-Forwards: 69 To: <sip:0669197533 at 77.91.132.9> From: "Anton" <sip:1065 at 77.91.132.9>;tag=5i21qaop43 Call-ID:
2002 Jun 18
7
Better filtering to a class
Dear all, I want to make a filter for all IRC-Dalnet traffic, so I want to put all traffic for port 6660, 6661, 6662, 6663, 6664, 6665, 6666, 6667, 6668, 6669, 7000, 7001, 7002, and 8000 to a class. So, I create a TC script as below. I''m sure, it is not effective, and we can write it in simpler. I need help, how to make my script below are simpler. The simpler, the better. Thank you
2008 Nov 06
10
[Bug 1535] New: rename doesn't fall back to rename syscall upon ENOSYS of link syscall
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1535 Summary: rename doesn't fall back to rename syscall upon ENOSYS of link syscall Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.1p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: patch Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: