Displaying 17 results from an estimated 17 matches similar to: "klibc insmod for recent kernels"
2003 Nov 26
1
[PATCH] use 2.6 module syscalls in klibc
I had a klibc build failure (on s390) because of include/sys/module.h
and noticed that it still has the old system call interface for 2.4
style modutils. Is there any reason to keep that in klibc?
This patch fixes the build problem by removing the old file and also
makes it possible to build module-init-tools (after some tweaking
there) against klibc.
Arnd <><
=====
2005 May 26
2
insmod ip_conntrack_ftp
Hello CentOS,
Is there a specific RPM that makes "insmod ip_conntrack_ftp"
available? I've been using that on a number of servers fine, but the
latest one I've built, running insmod ip_conntrack_ftp gives me:
insmod: can't read 'ip_conntrack_ftp': No such file or directory
--
Best regards,
Mickael
mailto:mike at kamloopsbc.com
www.MickaelMaddison.com
2005 Oct 17
1
module loading error with Ubuntu: insmod: error inserting '/lib/modules/2.6.12/misc/zaptel.ko': -1 Invalid module format
Hi,
I am trying to use zaptel module on an Ubuntu 5.10 distro (2.6.x kernel)
using gcc 4.0.2.
Compilation does not give me errors so after a 'make install' I try to
load zaptel module with insmod but the following error arise:
*insmod: error inserting '/lib/modules/2.6.12/misc/zaptel.ko': -1 Invalid module format*
Is there anybody who can help me??
TIA
Giorgio
--
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] brctl insmod
I noticed that when I type brctl - it does insmod when the bridge module
is not loaded. Where can I find the code (in the brctl or libbridge
code) which does that?
Thanks,
Abhijit
2010 Apr 27
1
include insmod patch
Am I wrong saying that actually anyone that use klibc has to use insmod
patch or build a monolithic kernel?
Could not the insmod patch be include?
That will make everyone life easier on klibc upgrade.
Gilles
2002 Mar 18
2
Failed to insmod sch_htb
Hi,
I''m new to HTB and CBQ, and i want to try it.
But i failed the first step: load modules.
I patch the kernel 2.4.17 succesfully, add QoS support, and all QoS
scheds in modules instead off kernel. make clean dep bzImage modules
modules_install copy the new kernel
reboot
fine
But when i :
server:~# insmod sch_htb
Using /lib/modules/2.4.17/kernel/net/sched/sch_htb.o
2006 Jan 27
2
inclusion of alias handling in klibc insmod
Just curious if anyone has done anything similar, as I'd rather not
reporduce work. I'm going to put alias handling (and only alias
handling) into a modified version of insmod. The reason I'm doing
this is to aid in boot time module loading via aliases exposed in
sysfs. Sure, I could include modprobe directly in the initramfs, but
it's a bit large, and I really only need alias
2009 Jan 15
2
OT - Differences between modprobe and insmod
hello,
Here (http://updates.xorcom.com/astribank/bristuff/1.4/INSTALL.html) you can
read :
cd qozap
modprobe zaptel
insmod qozap.o (for kernel 2.4)
insmod qozap.ko (for kernel 2.6)
ztcfg
I thought modprobe was a replacement for insmod.
Can someone be kind enough to explain :
1. the difference between modprobe and insmod,
2. why should both commands be issued,
3. how modprobe and insmod compare
2017 Jul 09
1
VM freezes while insmod virtio_net.ko
Hi all,
I encountered a tricky problem. I am using ovs+DPDK on the host side
to build the virtual network, so on the VM side , the virtio_net.ko
module is used to drive the nic. But VM always freezes while insmod
virtio_net.ko (I found virtio_net.ko is located in initrams.img by
defualt, so I had to delete all virtio modules from initramfs.img and
insmod then one by one after system is loaded to
2004 Oct 19
1
include insmod in klibc?
Hello,
I feel that the klibc package should include an insmod that can be used
on an initramfs. While it is possible to use an insmod built statically
against glibc, such a binary is (comparatively) huge at 565K.
The attached insmod.c is essentially the insmod.c from module-init-tools
minus a couple of lines related to calling the old (2.4) version of
insmod for backward compat.
BTW: Insmod
2011 May 31
6
[PATCH 1/4] febootstrap: Look for insmod.static, mke2fs in /sbin
---
configure.ac | 8 +++++---
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index da03c9f..7606bca 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -68,7 +68,8 @@ dnl For ArchLinux handler.
AC_CHECK_PROG(PACMAN,[pacman],[pacman],[no])
dnl Required programs, libraries.
-AC_PATH_PROG([INSMODSTATIC],[insmod.static],[no])
2018 Sep 12
2
How to make LLVM go faster?
Here is some timing information from running the Zig standard library tests:
$ ./zig test ../std/index.zig --enable-timing-info
Name Start End Duration Percent
Initialize 0.0000 0.0010 0.0010 0.0001
Semantic Analysis 0.0010 0.9968 0.9958 0.1192
Code Generation 0.9968 1.4000 0.4032
2003 Jul 14
2
insmod wcfxo failed ( b8zs, esf, wink start is what I'm trying to do.)
Thanks in advance
root@asterisk01:~# modprobe wcfxo
/lib/modules/2.4.20/misc/wcfxo.o: init_module: No such device
/lib/modules/2.4.20/misc/wcfxo.o: Hint: insmod errors can be caused by
incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters.
You may find more information in syslog or the output from dmesg
/lib/modules/2.4.20/misc/wcfxo.o: insmod /lib/modules/2.4.20/misc/wcfxo.o
2017 Sep 16
2
assertion triggered since update to llvm 5
When zig updated to llvm 5 we started hitting this assertion:
zig:
/home/andy/downloads/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Casting.h:106:
static bool llvm::isa_impl_cl<To, const From*>::doit(const From*) [with To
= llvm::Instruction; From = llvm::Value]: Assertion `Val && "isa<> used on
a null pointer"' failed.
I wonder if however this was caused by an
2017 Sep 17
2
assertion triggered since update to llvm 5
Can you please open a bug on bugzilla and attach the ir testcase? Your fix
doesn't look right (just hiding the assertion failure)
On Sep 17, 2017 10:45 AM, "Andrew Kelley via llvm-dev" <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> What do you think about this patch?
>
> --- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/NewGVN.cpp
> +++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/NewGVN.cpp
> @@
2017 Sep 17
4
assertion triggered since update to llvm 5
So, 90% of the time I've seen this, it was memory corruption, usually use
after free. I know I fixed one after 5.0 branched.
You should compile with address sanitizer enabled, and I suspect you will
find the issue quicky.
If not, we really need ir that reproduces it.
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017, 12:27 PM Andrew Kelley via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> I think I forgot to
2017 Sep 17
2
assertion triggered since update to llvm 5
Dump the IR before newgvn and run through opt -newgvn. It should crash. I'm
not familiar with your frontend but you might want to use -mllvm
-opt-bisect-limit.
On Sep 17, 2017 1:06 PM, "Andrew Kelley" <superjoe30 at gmail.com> wrote:
Valgrind is strictly better than address sanitizer, is that right? It runs
valgrind-clean:
[nix-shell:~/dev/zig/build-llvm5-debug]$ valgrind