similar to: klibc insmod for recent kernels

Displaying 17 results from an estimated 17 matches similar to: "klibc insmod for recent kernels"

2003 Nov 26
1
[PATCH] use 2.6 module syscalls in klibc
I had a klibc build failure (on s390) because of include/sys/module.h and noticed that it still has the old system call interface for 2.4 style modutils. Is there any reason to keep that in klibc? This patch fixes the build problem by removing the old file and also makes it possible to build module-init-tools (after some tweaking there) against klibc. Arnd <>< =====
2005 May 26
2
insmod ip_conntrack_ftp
Hello CentOS, Is there a specific RPM that makes "insmod ip_conntrack_ftp" available? I've been using that on a number of servers fine, but the latest one I've built, running insmod ip_conntrack_ftp gives me: insmod: can't read 'ip_conntrack_ftp': No such file or directory -- Best regards, Mickael mailto:mike at kamloopsbc.com www.MickaelMaddison.com
2005 Oct 17
1
module loading error with Ubuntu: insmod: error inserting '/lib/modules/2.6.12/misc/zaptel.ko': -1 Invalid module format
Hi, I am trying to use zaptel module on an Ubuntu 5.10 distro (2.6.x kernel) using gcc 4.0.2. Compilation does not give me errors so after a 'make install' I try to load zaptel module with insmod but the following error arise: *insmod: error inserting '/lib/modules/2.6.12/misc/zaptel.ko': -1 Invalid module format* Is there anybody who can help me?? TIA Giorgio --
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] brctl insmod
I noticed that when I type brctl - it does insmod when the bridge module is not loaded. Where can I find the code (in the brctl or libbridge code) which does that? Thanks, Abhijit
2010 Apr 27
1
include insmod patch
Am I wrong saying that actually anyone that use klibc has to use insmod patch or build a monolithic kernel? Could not the insmod patch be include? That will make everyone life easier on klibc upgrade. Gilles
2002 Mar 18
2
Failed to insmod sch_htb
Hi, I''m new to HTB and CBQ, and i want to try it. But i failed the first step: load modules. I patch the kernel 2.4.17 succesfully, add QoS support, and all QoS scheds in modules instead off kernel. make clean dep bzImage modules modules_install copy the new kernel reboot fine But when i : server:~# insmod sch_htb Using /lib/modules/2.4.17/kernel/net/sched/sch_htb.o
2006 Jan 27
2
inclusion of alias handling in klibc insmod
Just curious if anyone has done anything similar, as I'd rather not reporduce work. I'm going to put alias handling (and only alias handling) into a modified version of insmod. The reason I'm doing this is to aid in boot time module loading via aliases exposed in sysfs. Sure, I could include modprobe directly in the initramfs, but it's a bit large, and I really only need alias
2009 Jan 15
2
OT - Differences between modprobe and insmod
hello, Here (http://updates.xorcom.com/astribank/bristuff/1.4/INSTALL.html) you can read : cd qozap modprobe zaptel insmod qozap.o (for kernel 2.4) insmod qozap.ko (for kernel 2.6) ztcfg I thought modprobe was a replacement for insmod. Can someone be kind enough to explain : 1. the difference between modprobe and insmod, 2. why should both commands be issued, 3. how modprobe and insmod compare
2017 Jul 09
1
VM freezes while insmod virtio_net.ko
Hi all, I encountered a tricky problem. I am using ovs+DPDK on the host side to build the virtual network, so on the VM side , the virtio_net.ko module is used to drive the nic. But VM always freezes while insmod virtio_net.ko (I found virtio_net.ko is located in initrams.img by defualt, so I had to delete all virtio modules from initramfs.img and insmod then one by one after system is loaded to
2004 Oct 19
1
include insmod in klibc?
Hello, I feel that the klibc package should include an insmod that can be used on an initramfs. While it is possible to use an insmod built statically against glibc, such a binary is (comparatively) huge at 565K. The attached insmod.c is essentially the insmod.c from module-init-tools minus a couple of lines related to calling the old (2.4) version of insmod for backward compat. BTW: Insmod
2011 May 31
6
[PATCH 1/4] febootstrap: Look for insmod.static, mke2fs in /sbin
--- configure.ac | 8 +++++--- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index da03c9f..7606bca 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -68,7 +68,8 @@ dnl For ArchLinux handler. AC_CHECK_PROG(PACMAN,[pacman],[pacman],[no]) dnl Required programs, libraries. -AC_PATH_PROG([INSMODSTATIC],[insmod.static],[no])
2018 Sep 12
2
How to make LLVM go faster?
Here is some timing information from running the Zig standard library tests: $ ./zig test ../std/index.zig --enable-timing-info Name Start End Duration Percent Initialize 0.0000 0.0010 0.0010 0.0001 Semantic Analysis 0.0010 0.9968 0.9958 0.1192 Code Generation 0.9968 1.4000 0.4032
2003 Jul 14
2
insmod wcfxo failed ( b8zs, esf, wink start is what I'm trying to do.)
Thanks in advance root@asterisk01:~# modprobe wcfxo /lib/modules/2.4.20/misc/wcfxo.o: init_module: No such device /lib/modules/2.4.20/misc/wcfxo.o: Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters. You may find more information in syslog or the output from dmesg /lib/modules/2.4.20/misc/wcfxo.o: insmod /lib/modules/2.4.20/misc/wcfxo.o
2017 Sep 16
2
assertion triggered since update to llvm 5
When zig updated to llvm 5 we started hitting this assertion: zig: /home/andy/downloads/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Casting.h:106: static bool llvm::isa_impl_cl<To, const From*>::doit(const From*) [with To = llvm::Instruction; From = llvm::Value]: Assertion `Val && "isa<> used on a null pointer"' failed. I wonder if however this was caused by an
2017 Sep 17
2
assertion triggered since update to llvm 5
Can you please open a bug on bugzilla and attach the ir testcase? Your fix doesn't look right (just hiding the assertion failure) On Sep 17, 2017 10:45 AM, "Andrew Kelley via llvm-dev" < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > What do you think about this patch? > > --- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/NewGVN.cpp > +++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/NewGVN.cpp > @@
2017 Sep 17
4
assertion triggered since update to llvm 5
So, 90% of the time I've seen this, it was memory corruption, usually use after free. I know I fixed one after 5.0 branched. You should compile with address sanitizer enabled, and I suspect you will find the issue quicky. If not, we really need ir that reproduces it. On Sun, Sep 17, 2017, 12:27 PM Andrew Kelley via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I think I forgot to
2017 Sep 17
2
assertion triggered since update to llvm 5
Dump the IR before newgvn and run through opt -newgvn. It should crash. I'm not familiar with your frontend but you might want to use -mllvm -opt-bisect-limit. On Sep 17, 2017 1:06 PM, "Andrew Kelley" <superjoe30 at gmail.com> wrote: Valgrind is strictly better than address sanitizer, is that right? It runs valgrind-clean: [nix-shell:~/dev/zig/build-llvm5-debug]$ valgrind