similar to: defining directly to the wan/lan

I have a fedora system configured and running with virsh using kvm/qemu. All I want is to have a fixed ipaddress for that virtual machine. I know that there is the Host and Guest sides to the network. The host has virbr0 interface, which i guess is a bridge. Seem when ever I define a interface to the guest with a type=routed it hoses my other interfaces on the host and requires a console reboot --

Hello, I am experiencing what may be a unique problem with operating the bridge. My hardware is custom Freescale MPC875 processor based with one ethernet (eth0) and one hdlc (hdlc0) WAN port and I am connecting two of these boards together using the WAN ports over a long distance - essentially two bridges in series. They are running Linux 2.6.15 with bridging enabled in the kernel

hello I have a asterisk server on WAN, and one server on LAN. And now there are some users on the LAN server. Users on the LAN server need to make phone calls to PSTN through the WAN server. Now on WAN server, there is a user account for the LAN server to register, and it's an account with multiple ports.(So more than one users on the LAN server can make phone calls through the WAN server at

Guus: Ok, I accept your challenge. But I am clueless in terms of getting the routing table correct. So each server has a dual identity, both a LAN private identity with a PRIVATE IP address and a WAN public identify with a PUBLIC ip address. And how to have 2 different tun devices show up in the ifconfig -a so that LAN IP address can be assigned to the tun0 and a WAN IP address can be assigned

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 05:29:16PM -0500, md at rpzdesign.com wrote: > I guess my primary point of confusion is that the non-vpn LAN ip > addresses are duplicated in each cluster. So within a cluster, the LAN > addresses are unique. > > But when you look at 2 clusters, 2 different servers share the > 10.99.0.11 address. That should not be a problem for tinc. As long as both

Hi everybody... How can I share my WAN ip to my LAN? How can I do that I really dont know...:( I am using linux long time ago but this kind I would like to do newly... Can anybody help me about IP sharing in Centos? thanks alot... -- Tolun ARDAHANLI Bilgisayar Muhendisi E-posta:tolun.ardahanli at linux.org.tr Icq:326600

ClarkConnect Home 3.2 eth0 - WAN - inet - ip:192.168.1.2 gw:192.168.1.1 (connected to my www.woosh.co.nz gatway) wlan - WAN - private community wireless networt - ip:10.252.16.16 gw:10.252.16.1 eth1 - LAN - ip:192.168.2.1 # route add -net 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 gw 10.252.16.1 [root@bowenvale etc]# route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface

Hi, I have a weird issue that I hope someone can help me with. I have 2 test computers and I've changed each the roles of each one with the same results. I have one xlite client running across a VPN and another connecting directly from the WAN via the external IP. The client connecting directly to the external IP can call the client running across the VPN no problem. However, the client

Hi, I''m implementing a linux router with this characteristics: - Multiple adsl with each public ip''s - Multiple LAN ethernets (in a bridge). - Linux IGD I have successfully implemented de 2 first steps, the adsl balanced fine (multipath routing), and the clients bridge fine. My problem is how to use that with linux-igd. My LAN bridge has STP and is implemented for

You need a combination of iptables and iproute2 to do what you want = because routing is based on it's DESTINATION address and you need to route on = your SOURCE address so it uses a different route depending on which source = IP is in the packet.. Refer to this page which is sort of what you want BUT not exact. It'll = give you some ideas...

Hi folks! This is sort of OT but I thought maybe someone had a tip for me. What I'm looking for is a tool that I can install on two computer for example, put one on each side of the customers WAN and "try" the connection - simulalate x calls (using codec xxx) and get statistics out of it (delays, jitter, dropped packets and that sort of things). I have looked at ethertap (to debug

Hello my Sambese friends, Has anyone got info on tuning the SMB client in OSX for connecting to Samba servers across a WAN/VPN? I get decent performance locally, but when I reach across our VPN link to another site, throughput falls right to garbage when compared with FTP. Thanks in advance for any tips. --Rob Rob LaRose systems administrator imaginary forces | 530 west 25th street | new

Dear all... I'm a Chinese and I don't think that my English is well . But I have a big problem in use IPTABLES . I've looked all the documents and FAQs , but I can't find a solution to solve my problem . At last I decide to ask you in my poor English ...^^|| I have a Linux server (Turbo Linux7.0 in kernel 2.4.9-3) to be my NAT server . I have make it running iptables-1.2.2-6 . It

We recently installed Samba 3.x server on Linux system (RHEL 3.0, using stock RH samba packages). We are observing following messages in logs: lib/access.c:check_access(328) and access is denied. I know why we get access denied: we have restricted "hosts allow =" setting. My question is: why are we getting connection requests in first place? I think something is advertising this

We are having an issue that I have been unable to figure out how to resolve. I think its related to the Polycom Phones and not the Asterisk configuration, but I'm not positive. We have several Polycom 500/501/601's on both a LAN and at employee homes. The problem we are having is if our internet connection goes down the Local LAN phones loose their connection to the Asterisk Server.

Gus: I guess my primary point of confusion is that the non-vpn LAN ip addresses are duplicated in each cluster. So within a cluster, the LAN addresses are unique. But when you look at 2 clusters, 2 different servers share the 10.99.0.11 address. So that is why I created a VPN for inside the cluster on the LAN interfaces using the private 10.0.1.xx range. THen, I created a separate VPN on the

pc1(LANa) ----poor connection ----> VPS <--------- PC2(LANb) pc1 and pc2 used to connected directly with tinc, since pc1 used to have WAN IP(pppoe), but the pppoe IP is not WAN IP anymore (ISP changed to let all ADSL user in a LAN). if I let the two pc connect to a VPS with tinc, can later connections between pc1 and pc2 be directly ? for example, ssh from pc1 to pc2 but not proxyed by

Hi, I wan?t to add iptables rules between existing rules and the rules created by libvirt (forward type=nat). I did try the hook /etc/libvirt/hooks/network network_name start begin - and /etc/libvirt/hooks/network network_name started begin - It seems like the libvirt iptables rules are already inserted when this hook is executed. Simply use ?I instead of ?A does not work either

Hola, I have a question in regards to ignoring traffic shaping for LAN side that connects to a DMZ IMAP server through the WAN interface. The DMZ and the WAN side are both on a 10/100 switch. Is it possible? Thanks. ~Andrew. OS MDK 9.1 kernel-smp-2.4.21.0.33mdk-1-1mdk HTB; iproute2-2.4.7-7mdk; shorewall-1.4.8-2.2.92mdk

On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 02:27:44PM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 10:18 AM Pino Toscano <ptoscano@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Tuesday, 9 October 2018 20:16:04 CEST Nir Soffer wrote: > > > I'm trying to build fedora-27 image for testing uploads: > > > > > > $ virt-builder fedora-27 -o /var/tmp/fedora-27.img > > > ...