similar to: [PATCHv2] virtio-spec: virtio network device multiqueue support

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "[PATCHv2] virtio-spec: virtio network device multiqueue support"

2012 Nov 23
1
[PATCHv5] virtio-spec: virtio network device RFS support
Add RFS support to virtio network device. Add a new feature flag VIRTIO_NET_F_RFS for this feature, a new configuration field max_virtqueue_pairs to detect supported number of virtqueues as well as a new command VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_RFS to program packet steering for unidirectional protocols. --- Changes from v4: - address Jason's comments - have configuration specify the number of VQ pairs and
2012 Nov 23
1
[PATCHv5] virtio-spec: virtio network device RFS support
Add RFS support to virtio network device. Add a new feature flag VIRTIO_NET_F_RFS for this feature, a new configuration field max_virtqueue_pairs to detect supported number of virtqueues as well as a new command VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_RFS to program packet steering for unidirectional protocols. --- Changes from v4: - address Jason's comments - have configuration specify the number of VQ pairs and
2012 Nov 22
2
[PATCHv4] virtio-spec: virtio network device RFS support
Add RFS support to virtio network device. Add a new feature flag VIRTIO_NET_F_RFS for this feature, a new configuration field max_virtqueue_pairs to detect supported number of virtqueues as well as a new command VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_RFS to program packet steering for unidirectional protocols. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> -- Changes from v3: - rename multiqueue ->
2012 Nov 22
2
[PATCHv4] virtio-spec: virtio network device RFS support
Add RFS support to virtio network device. Add a new feature flag VIRTIO_NET_F_RFS for this feature, a new configuration field max_virtqueue_pairs to detect supported number of virtqueues as well as a new command VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_RFS to program packet steering for unidirectional protocols. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> -- Changes from v3: - rename multiqueue ->
2013 Mar 14
4
[PATCH] virtio-spec: add field for scsi command size
Add field for guest to specify command size for virtio-blk. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- virtio-spec.lyx | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/virtio-spec.lyx b/virtio-spec.lyx index a8ce3f9..fea97ed 100644 --- a/virtio-spec.lyx +++ b/virtio-spec.lyx @@ -5826,6 +5826,16 @@
2013 Mar 14
4
[PATCH] virtio-spec: add field for scsi command size
Add field for guest to specify command size for virtio-blk. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- virtio-spec.lyx | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/virtio-spec.lyx b/virtio-spec.lyx index a8ce3f9..fea97ed 100644 --- a/virtio-spec.lyx +++ b/virtio-spec.lyx @@ -5826,6 +5826,16 @@
2013 May 08
1
[PATCH] virtio-balloon spec: rework VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_MUST_TELL_HOST feature, support silent deflation
The idea of the VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_MUST_TELL_HOST feature is to let drivers skip usage of the deflate queue when leaking the balloon ("silent deflation"). Guests may benefit from silent deflate by aggressively inflating the balloon; they know that they will be able to use ballooned pages without issuing a (blocking) request to the device. The problem is that this feature is a
2013 May 08
1
[PATCH] virtio-balloon spec: rework VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_MUST_TELL_HOST feature, support silent deflation
The idea of the VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_MUST_TELL_HOST feature is to let drivers skip usage of the deflate queue when leaking the balloon ("silent deflation"). Guests may benefit from silent deflate by aggressively inflating the balloon; they know that they will be able to use ballooned pages without issuing a (blocking) request to the device. The problem is that this feature is a
2010 Feb 18
5
[PATCH] virtio-spec: document block CMD and FLUSH
I took a stub at documenting CMD and FLUSH request types in virtio block. Christoph, could you look over this please? I note that the interface seems full of warts to me, this might be a first step to cleaning them. One issue I struggled with especially is how type field mixes bits and non-bit values. I ended up simply defining all legal values, so that we have CMD = 2, CMD_OUT = 3 and so on.
2010 Feb 18
5
[PATCH] virtio-spec: document block CMD and FLUSH
I took a stub at documenting CMD and FLUSH request types in virtio block. Christoph, could you look over this please? I note that the interface seems full of warts to me, this might be a first step to cleaning them. One issue I struggled with especially is how type field mixes bits and non-bit values. I ended up simply defining all legal values, so that we have CMD = 2, CMD_OUT = 3 and so on.
2012 Dec 07
3
[PATCHv6] virtio-spec: virtio network device multiqueue support
Add multiqueue support to virtio network device. Add a new feature flag VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ for this feature, a new configuration field max_virtqueue_pairs to detect supported number of virtqueues as well as a new command VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MQ to program packet steering for unidirectional protocols. --- Changes in v6: - rename RFS -> multiqueue to avoid confusion with RFS in linux mention
2012 Dec 07
3
[PATCHv6] virtio-spec: virtio network device multiqueue support
Add multiqueue support to virtio network device. Add a new feature flag VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ for this feature, a new configuration field max_virtqueue_pairs to detect supported number of virtqueues as well as a new command VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MQ to program packet steering for unidirectional protocols. --- Changes in v6: - rename RFS -> multiqueue to avoid confusion with RFS in linux mention
2012 Sep 06
2
[PATCHv3] virtio-spec: virtio network device multiqueue support
Add multiqueue support to virtio network device. Add a new feature flag VIRTIO_NET_F_MULTIQUEUE for this feature, a new configuration field max_virtqueue_pairs to detect supported number of virtqueues as well as a new command VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_STEERING to program packet steering. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> -- Changes from v2: Address Jason's comments on v2: -
2012 Sep 06
2
[PATCHv3] virtio-spec: virtio network device multiqueue support
Add multiqueue support to virtio network device. Add a new feature flag VIRTIO_NET_F_MULTIQUEUE for this feature, a new configuration field max_virtqueue_pairs to detect supported number of virtqueues as well as a new command VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_STEERING to program packet steering. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> -- Changes from v2: Address Jason's comments on v2: -
2012 Sep 09
1
[PATCHv4] virtio-spec: virtio network device multiqueue support
Add multiqueue support to virtio network device. Add a new feature flag VIRTIO_NET_F_MULTIQUEUE for this feature, a +new configuration field max_virtqueue_pairs to detect supported number +of virtqueues as well as a new command VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_STEERING to +program packet steering. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Changes from v3: Address Sasha's comments - drop
2012 Sep 09
1
[PATCHv4] virtio-spec: virtio network device multiqueue support
Add multiqueue support to virtio network device. Add a new feature flag VIRTIO_NET_F_MULTIQUEUE for this feature, a +new configuration field max_virtqueue_pairs to detect supported number +of virtqueues as well as a new command VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_STEERING to +program packet steering. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Changes from v3: Address Sasha's comments - drop
2012 Sep 06
2
[PATCH] virtio-balloon spec: provide a version of the "silent deflate" feature that works
VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_MUST_TELL_HOST cannot be used properly because it is a "negative" feature: it tells you that silent defalte is not supported. Right now, QEMU refuses migration if the target does not support all the features that were negotiated. But then: - a migration from non-MUST_TELL_HOST to MUST_TELL_HOST will succeed, which is wrong; - a migration from MUST_TELL_HOST to
2012 Sep 06
2
[PATCH] virtio-balloon spec: provide a version of the "silent deflate" feature that works
VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_MUST_TELL_HOST cannot be used properly because it is a "negative" feature: it tells you that silent defalte is not supported. Right now, QEMU refuses migration if the target does not support all the features that were negotiated. But then: - a migration from non-MUST_TELL_HOST to MUST_TELL_HOST will succeed, which is wrong; - a migration from MUST_TELL_HOST to
2012 Sep 09
2
[PATCH] virtio-spec: balloon: MUST_TELL_HOST is optional
Drivers treat MUST_TELL_HOST as optional: windows drivers do not ack it and expect this means they can tell host *after* deflate. This was not the intent but the documentation was not very clear on this point. Luckily hyprevisors did not implement this feature yet so to provide guidance for future devices make spec match drivers expectations, and clarify that this feature only has effect if
2012 Sep 09
2
[PATCH] virtio-spec: balloon: MUST_TELL_HOST is optional
Drivers treat MUST_TELL_HOST as optional: windows drivers do not ack it and expect this means they can tell host *after* deflate. This was not the intent but the documentation was not very clear on this point. Luckily hyprevisors did not implement this feature yet so to provide guidance for future devices make spec match drivers expectations, and clarify that this feature only has effect if