similar to: Catenating strings involving plotmath symbols.

Dear R-users, i have to integrate the following function `fun1` <- function (a, l1, l2) { exp(log(l1) * (a - 1) - l2 * lgamma(a)) } but if l1 is large, i get the "non-finite function value" error, so my idea is to rescale with exp(-l1) `fun2` <- function (a, l1, l2) { exp(log(l1) * (a - 1) - l2 * lgamma(a) - l1) } but it seems this doesn't solve the problem, when

I was wondering if one can have the coefficients of VAR model sorted according to variable names rather than lags. If you notice below, the output is sorted according to lags. >VAR(cbind(fossil,labour),p=2,type="const") VAR Estimation Results: ======================= Estimated coefficients for equation fossil: =========================================== Call: fossil = fossil.l1

Hi Could anybody explain me how to check how many L1/L2 cache my cpu have. I'm using CentOS 5.6 *cat /proc/cpuinfo |grep CPU * model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T9300 @ 2.50GHz model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T9300 @ 2.50GHz Diagram of a generic dual-core processor, with CPU-local level 1 caches, and a shared, on-die level 2 cache.

Hi, I'm running into a wall when trying to use the integrate function. I have the following setting: powerLaw2 <- function(x,l1,l2,c0,t0) { idx <- which(x <= 0); if (length(idx) > 0) { x[idx] <- 0; } xl <- (-l1+l2)*log(x/t0); L <- log(c0)-l1*log(x)-log(1+exp(xl)); L <- exp(L); return(L); } plCDF2 <- function(x,l1,l2,c0,t0) {

I have a vector of character strings such as mainnames<-c("CAD","AUD") and another vector say checknames<-c("CAD.l1","AUD.l1","JPY.l1","EUR.l1","CAD.l2","AUD.l2","JPY .l2","EUR.l2") I want a new vector of character strings that is just

John Ackermann N8UR via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> writes: > I am monitoring via the SNMP driver an APC SmartUPS that has split > phase (2L + neutral) 240V input and 120/120 volt outputs. The data > for the voltages is not what I'm expecting, and I am wondering how I > should interpret it. Wow, that sounds kind of industrial. Model? Is the

Following up on this, I've figured out what's going on. What I'm not sure of is how best to address the situation. I'd like to avoid going down to the MIB level because I just don't understand it. "Split phase" output devices seem to fall into an undefined area. They're not three phase, but require additional MIB values so APC uses their 3-phase MIB

Thanks, Tim. The unit was available with single as well as split phase output, and from the data I can find the input was single phase, though the input connector has L1/L2/N/G wires. I'm digging through the MIB to see what the raw data looks like. Thanks! John ---- On 11/11/24 19:14, Tim Dawson wrote: > Sounds pretty normal from what I see. It appears that this is *NOT* a > true

Sounds pretty normal from what I see. It appears that this is *NOT* a true 240v UPS, but rather one that provides two legs of 120v output from two legs of 120 input, and what is seen as "L2" is actually neutral, and the line names are reporting incorrectly. With that in mind, each leg in should be 120v, as well as the outputs, which is exactly what you are seeing.(The fact tht L1 to L3

Hi -- I am monitoring via the SNMP driver an APC SmartUPS that has split phase (2L + neutral) 240V input and 120/120 volt outputs. The data for the voltages is not what I'm expecting, and I am wondering how I should interpret it. Here is an example from upsc: input.L1-L2.voltage: 121 input.L2-L3.voltage: 120 input.voltage: 121.20 output.current: 5.90 output.L1-L2.voltage: 119

I'm hoping that this is a relatively easy question for someone familiar with the lme4 package. I'm accustomed to using HLM software and writing a simple 2 level [null] equation like this: L1 - Yij = b0 + e L2 - b0 = B00 + u0 The following command in R provides results that are identical to the HLM program. results <- lmer( Y ~ 1 |id , PanelData4) I can't

I think that's incorrect. It should to: .section .foo .L1: .L2 = .L1 .section .bar .long .L3-.L2 .L3: Because .L3 and .L2 are in different sections. - Justin On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > This reduces to > > .section .foo > .L1: > .L2 = .L1 > .section .bar > .long .L1-.L2 > > > Which is fairly

Hello, #I have two matrices, eg.: y <- matrix( c(20, NA, NA, 45, 50, 19, 32, 101, 10, 22, NA, NA, 80, 49, 61, 190), ncol=4 ) x <- matrix( c(20, NA, NA, NA, 50, 19, 32, 101, 10, 22, NA, NA, 80, 49, 61, 190), ncol=4 ) #Whereas x contains all NA?s from y plus some additional NA?s. #I want to find the index of these additional NA?s. I think, there must be a very

Hi list, I have a very strange problem with my network. I have 2 internet connections: A - 1 Gbit, B - 100Mbps. Network layout: A, B | | [Brd1] / \ [L1] [L2] \ / [ GW1] ................... Clients ..................... Brd1 runs bgpd, and balances the traffic through L1 and L2. L1 and L2 do traffic shaping. GW1 does some packet

Hello,? I want to split the dataframe into 1000 groups based on two column values(max value and second max value). First, I made two lists L1 and L2. ?L1 is the list divided into 100 groups based on the range of max value and L2 is divided into 10 groups based on the second max values. Now I want to do the combinations based on L1 and L2. I want to do a for loop for L1 and for each element in L1,

Hi, I am trying to create a dotplot where each panel shows levels vs. responses; the levels are sorted by responses but levels vary from one panel to another. However, I run into problems with controlling the y-limits and y-labels. In particular, suppose I have a data frame rsp <- c(10,2,4,0,2,3) lvl <-

I have two factors l1, l2, and I'd like to merge them. (Remark: The factors can not be converted to charaters) Function c() does not give me the result I want: > l1 = factor(c('aaaa', 'bbbb')) > l2 = factor(c('ccc', 'dd')) > lMerge = factor(c(l1, l2)) > lMerge [1] 1 2 1 2 Levels: 1 2 > I'd like to merge l1 and l2 and to get lMerge

Hello list, I am wondering if a joining "one-to-many" can be done a little bit easier. I tried merge function but I was not able to do it, so I end up using for and if. Suppose you have a table with locations, each location repeated several times, and some attributes at that location. The second table has the same locations, but only once with a different set of attributes. I would

Hi LLVM developers, I want to add LICM pass after loop unrolling pass in current optimization pipeline. Because both of them are loop passes, so if I registered them one by one, they will interleaved go through all loops in bottom up way within same loop pass manager. Loop unroling pass may create new inner loops from partial unrolling, and those newly created loops can be visited only if the

On 08.02.2018 11:46, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 11:26:14PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 07.02.2018 16:31, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > > [...] > >> Sounds like a similar problem as in >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198621 >> >> In short: there is no (live) migration support for nested VMX yet. So as >>