similar to: [Bug 8895] New: rsync warning: some files vanished

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8456 Summary: improve --link-dest bahaviour Product: rsync Version: 3.0.8 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: toralf.foerster at gmx.de

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8450 Summary: --link-dest seems not to work mounted NTFS file systems Product: rsync Version: 3.0.8 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

On 10/20/2014 07:34 PM, Toralf F?rster wrote: > I uploaded the screen shots from the virt-manager to [1] and [2] > > FWIW e56d9fccb was fine so the bug slipped in after that. > > > [1] http://www.directupload.net/file/d/3781/j9mwrtpq_jpg.htm > [2] http://www.directupload.net/file/d/3781/29trc56v_jpg.htm > It might be virtio-console related, when the uevetns are

On 10/20/2014 07:34 PM, Toralf F?rster wrote: > I uploaded the screen shots from the virt-manager to [1] and [2] > > FWIW e56d9fccb was fine so the bug slipped in after that. > > > [1] http://www.directupload.net/file/d/3781/j9mwrtpq_jpg.htm > [2] http://www.directupload.net/file/d/3781/29trc56v_jpg.htm > It might be virtio-console related, when the uevetns are

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2269 Bug ID: 2269 Summary: ssh-copy-id: does not respect .ssh/config Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.6p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh-copy-id Assignee: unassigned-bugs

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3722 Bug ID: 3722 Summary: check ssh key (and other parameters) before running the proxy command Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.8p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component:

After reading this comment https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30157#c5 I'm wondering whether the registry value in comment #4 of that bug report should be made a default value for wine or not ? -- MfG/Kind regards Toralf F?rster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3

Hi ! I`m getting "rsync warning: some files vanished before they could be transferred (code 24) at main.c(1518) [generator=3.0.9]" on one of my systems i`m backing up with rsync , but rsync doesn`t show WHICH files. Does anybody have a clue under which circumstances rsync doesn`t show these ? regards Roland

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2695 Bug ID: 2695 Summary: inconsistent outout of "ssh.add -l" between ed25519 and rsa keys Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.3p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component:

Hi I would like to ask, when the "vanished files" warning is a sign that something bad is happening somewhere. I know that the `rsync-no-vanished` script can silence the warning, but I am wondering whether this is a sane thing to do. My guess based on https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3653#c26 and https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10356 is that it's fine, but

On 10/21/2014 06:40 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Toralf F?rster <toralf.foerster at gmx.de> wrote: >> On 10/20/2014 07:34 PM, Toralf F?rster wrote: >>> I uploaded the screen shots from the virt-manager to [1] and [2] >>> >>> FWIW e56d9fccb was fine so the bug slipped in after that. >>> >> >>>

On 10/21/2014 06:40 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Toralf F?rster <toralf.foerster at gmx.de> wrote: >> On 10/20/2014 07:34 PM, Toralf F?rster wrote: >>> I uploaded the screen shots from the virt-manager to [1] and [2] >>> >>> FWIW e56d9fccb was fine so the bug slipped in after that. >>> >> >>>

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6578 Summary: put out skipped dirs files w/ perms and ownership Product: rsync Version: 3.0.5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: toralf.foerster

Hello, just my opinion, but yesterday I run into a case, where after 7 hours of transferring a file (a little bit greater than 1 GB) the scp reported 100% and after that exited with an error (AIX 7.1): $ tsocks scp foo user at host:/tmp ... 100% 1101MB 44.2KB/s 448.0KB/s 7:05:38 scp: /tmp/foo: File too large Probably it should not be rounded up to 100% ? -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf F?rster

I'm wondering what's wrong with the follwoing command : tfoerste at n22 ~ $ wine regedit ~/Wine/dpi.reg regedit: setValue failed to open key System\CurrentControlSet\Hardware Profiles\Current\Software\Fonts tfoerste at n22 ~ $ cat Wine/dpi.reg [System\CurrentControlSet\Hardware Profiles\Current\Software\Fonts] "LogPixels"=dword:00000073 Pls reply to me too I'm not

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6577 Summary: man page mentioned http://lists.samba.org Product: rsync Version: 3.0.5 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: toralf.foerster at gmx.de

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 5:49 PM Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net> wrote: > Nothing there should be preventing incremental indexing. That means it > should start copying as soon as it finds a file that needs to be copied. > Doesn't it tries to create all (empty) directories first? > On 03/20/2018 02:33 PM, Bráulio Bhavamitra wrote: > > > > > > Em seg, 19

OK. Thanks. Where can I find information regarding how to interpret —itemize-changes? The timestamps aren’t changing, so the target must not be storing them, which I have no idea why. The directory I’m writing to is 777. What is the flag to tell rsync to ignore the timestamps? Thanks, Blake On 6/2/16, 6:18 PM, "rsync on behalf of Kevin Korb" <rsync-bounces at lists.samba.org on

Em seg, 19 de mar de 2018 11:34, Kevin Korb via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> escreveu: > The performance of rsync with a huge number of files is greatly > determined by every option you are using. So, what is your whole > command line? > rsync -avP /data-old/ /data > > On 03/19/2018 09:05 AM, Bráulio Bhavamitra via rsync wrote: > > Hi all, > > > >

Thank you! I run --times when I use rsync (I actually use the -a flag) but the times do not transfer over and if I run rsync dryrun with -i I can see that it wants to transfer the files because of times. When I run rsync a second time with your suggestion the times do transfer over. I don't know why... B ________________________________________ From: rsync [rsync-bounces at lists.samba.org]