similar to: Help with loess "Standard Error of the Residuals"

Hi, Our firm is looking to see if it is possible to wrap some of more advanced lib in R like modreg.dll and specifically Loess function in there for both regression and prediction into MSVC++. We will probably take it to either VB or Python for implementation issues. Given that locfit has many utitlities built in for data transformation, this would be a good thing. If that's not

Hi all, I 've got a question about the usage of loess in the modreg package. The documentation (loess.html) states that the smoothing window is either set by span or enp.target. If span is used, the details section of the docs state... <SNIP> DETAILS Fitting is done locally. That is, for the fit at point x, the fit is made using points in a neighbourhood of x, weighted by their

Hi all, I 've got a question about the usage of loess in the modreg package. The documentation (loess.html) states that the smoothing window is either set by span or enp.target. If span is used, the details section of the docs state... <SNIP> DETAILS Fitting is done locally. That is, for the fit at point x, the fit is made using points in a neighbourhood of x, weighted by their

Hi all, I'm trying to apply loess regression to my data and then use the fitted model to get the *standardized/studentized residuals. I understood that for linear regression (lm) there are functions to do that:* * * fit1 = lm(y~x) stdres.fit1 = rstandard(fit1) studres.fit1 = rstudent(fit1) I was wondering if there is an equally simple way to get the standardized/studentized residuals for a

I was sniffing in the fracdiff library (this is for fractionally integrated ARMA processes; Haslett and Raftery 1989). The documentation suggests that one tries the following simple example: library(fracdiff) ts.test <- fracdiff.sim( 5000, ar = .2, ma = -.4, d = .3) fracdiff( ts.test$series, nar = length(ts.test$ar), nma = length(ts.test$ma)) When I run this, I get the following error: R

> Nobody has looked into it yet. Likely just an extra build rule > required, I would need to see the 9.11 and 9.12 DLZ header files to > check. > > Aaron Haslett (CC'ed) may be able to help once he fights past the other > BIND9 issues he is looking at. > > Andrew Bartlett Thanks for response. I actually looked it myself. Since there is no DLZ ABI changes since

On Fri, 03 Aug 2018 12:28:38 +1200 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2018-08-02 at 22:37 +0300, Taner Tas wrote: > > > Nobody has looked into it yet. Likely just an extra build rule > > > required, I would need to see the 9.11 and 9.12 DLZ header files to > > > check. > > > > > > Aaron Haslett (CC'ed) may be able

Colleagues ---------------------------------- System info: R version rw1022 on NT ESS v. 5.1.18 using emacs ver. 20.4 ---------------------------------- I would like to access the residuals from a lowess fit (function lowess() ) as an aid to assessing whether I am over-smoothing or under-smoothing a dataset (as in Cleveland's book "Visualizing data", section 3.3) Unless I

Dear list and Martin, I'm testing different approaches to fit an electricity demand time series and come upon the fracdiff package (v 1.3-1) for fitting fractional ARIMA models. The following questions are motivated by this package. 1. Despite having a help page, the residuals and fitted functions don't seem to have implementation, or did i miss something obvious? Alternatively, having a

Hi, For some reason I have been unable to use the predict function when I desire the standard error to be calculated too. For example, when I try the following: l<- loess(d~x+y, span=span, se=TRUE) p<- predict(l, se=TRUE) I get the following error message: Error in vector("double", length) : vector size cannot be NA In addition: Warning message: In N * M1 : NAs produced by

Full_Name: Benjamin Tyner Version: 2.1.0, 4/18/2005 OS: i686-redhat-linux-gnu Submission from: (NULL) (4.64.8.220) # Just run my.test() below in a newly opened R session. Once too many models have been fit (~20 on my system), the computed standard error jumps to a different value. This is (superficially) due to a different residual sum of squares, not a different one.delta. No other aspect of

Hi, There is a discussion in June regarding Bind 9.12 and Samba but that discussion has no any updated information. I checked out git but it seems that there's no related update on upstream either. Is there any progress on this? Maybe I should file a bug report. I sent a email to bugzilla-maintenance for a bugzilla acount but no response yet. *

I'm updating the loess routines to allow for, among other things, arbitrary local polynomial degree and number of predictors. For now, I've given the updated package its own namespace. The trouble is, panel.loess still calls the original code in package:stats instead of the new loess package, regardless of whether package:loess or package:lattice comes first in the search list. If I

hi! i want to change the "robustness weights" used by loess. these are described on page 316 of chambers and hastie's "statistical models in S" book as r_i = B(e_i,6m) where B is tukey's biweight function, e_i are the residulas, and m is the median average distance from 0 of the residuals. i want to change 6m to, say, 3m. is there a way to do this? i cant

Dear R community, I am trying to understand how the predict function, specifically, the predict.loess function works. I understand that the loess function calculates regression parameters at each data point in 'data'. lo <- loess ( y~x, data) p <- predict (lo, newdata) I understand that the predict function predicts values for 'newdata' according to the loess regression

I have a question about running an optimization function on an existing LOESS function defined in R. I have a very large dataset (1 million observations) and have run a LOESS regression. Now, I want to run a Newton-Raphson optimization to determine the point at which the slope change is the greatest. I am relatively new to R and have tried several permutations of the maxNR and nlm functions with

For some reason the following code is not plotting as I want it to. I want to plot a "loess" line plotted over a scatter plot. I get a jumble, with lines connecting all the points. I had a similar problem with "lowess". I solved that by dropping "NA" rows from the data columns. Please help. library(stats) attach(gini_pci_wdi_narm) plot(ny_gnp_pcap_pp_kd, si_pov_gini)

Hi, I wonder why my attempt to extend an existing loess fit to a new data set is producing error. I was trying the following: dat = read.csv(choose.files()) x = dat[,2]; y = dat[,1] x.sort = sort(x) y.loess = loess(y~x, span=0.75) # For testing the above fit with a new dataset: test = read.csv(choose.files()) # test data new_x = test [,1]; new_y = test[,2] new_x.sort = sort(new_x) predicted

Dear Anupam Tyagi, You didn't include your data, so it's not possible to see exactly what happened, but I think that you misunderstand the object that loess() returns. It returns a "loess" object with several components, including the original data in x and y. So if pass the object to lines(), you'll simply connect the points, and if x isn't sorted, the points

>From what I understand, loess in R uses the standard tri-cube function. SAS/INSIGHT offers loess with Gaussian weights. Is there a function in R that does the same? Also, can anyone offer any references comparing properties between tri-cube and Gaussian weights in LOESS? Thanks. - Andr? -- View this message in context: