similar to: link(2) EMLINK error behavior with --link-dest and --hard-links

Hi, we use attachment dedup with lots of emails (still migrating to it from maildir). We use netapp storage with wafl filesystem over nfs. Problem is that netapp has hard limit of 100k hardlinks to one file. And we encountered it. Problem is that dovecot start do segfault (lmtp,dsync,pop3 etc) when it happend when tried to deliver new emails with that attachment. Here is strace of dsync: 6740

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10637 Summary: rsync --link-dest should break hard links when encountering "Too many links" Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo:

samba-bugs at samba.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10637 > > --- Comment #1 from Karl O. Pinc <kop at meme.com> 2014-05-28 19:05:04 UTC --- > Yum is also rsync happy. That's where our --link-dest backups always break due > to too many hard links. ---------- What would be "too many"? -- a few million? I have files in a test setup that

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1459 Bug ID: 1459 Summary: EMLINK error for NFT_GOTO Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: kernel Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5407 Summary: hlink.c:480: finish_hard_link: Assertion `flist != ((void *)0)' failed. Product: rsync Version: 3.0.2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

This patch remove the redundant "i_nlink >= OCFS2_LINK_MAX" check and add an unlinked directory check. Singed-off-by: mfasheh diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c index 0673862..719a8d2 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c @@ -643,11 +643,6 @@ static int ocfs2_link(struct dentry *old goto bail; } - if (inode->i_nlink

# HG changeset patch # User Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de> # Date 1333120147 -7200 # Node ID 34d9828185501f6e7ea2c3c2a397176a8e54ef0a # Parent 80653c8ea1d19dfe6130396bbc77f766eb9f9fab xenpaging: add error code to indicate iommem passthrough Similar to the existing ENODEV and EXDEV error codes, add EMDEV to indicate that iommu passthrough is not compatible with paging. All error codes are

I've looked around for a bug report on this problem and haven't seen one, so I apologize if this has already been discussed. I have a homegrown script which uses rsync to maintain daily backups of roughly twenty Redhat Linux systems running RH 7.2, 7.3, AS 3, and AS 4. As there are files with multiple links on the source systems, it is necessary to call rsync using the -H (--hard-links)

Familiar? protocol error on a local file copy? How can I have a proto incompat when it it is talking to itself?... This was on the ERROUT... rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4 bytes to socket [sender]: Broken pipe (32) File-list index 531530 not in 531937 - 533437 (finish_hard_link) [generator] rsync error: protocol incompatibility (code 2) at rsync.c(652) [generator=3.0.9] rsync:

While using dirvish, I ran into a runaway rsync process, which was continually spewing errors after encountering a "Too many links" error. This was with 2.6.9. I tried it again with the latest cvs version, and now at least it doesn't endless-loop with errors, but instead gives an assertion error. To reproduce: $ cd /tmp $ mkdir a b $ cd a $ date > a $ x=1 $ while ln a a$x; do

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7454 Summary: assertion failed in finish_hard_link() Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: bas at debian.org

Hello, I'm trying to do backups with rsync through ssh. This is what I wrote yet: src="/vrmd/webserver/" today=`date +%F` #link_dest="root@vm2:/vrmd/admin/backup/web/2004-09-05" link_dest="../2004-09-05" dest="root@vm2:/vrmd/admin/backup/web/$today" rsync -av -e ssh --delete --link-dest=$link_dest $src $dest in 2004-09-05 (on the dest-server) is the

I would rather the maintainers would spend their time improving the application, and not worrying aobut the OP's hurt little open-sourced religious feelings. I use rsync to transfer pretty massive (wait for it) ADOBE PHOTOSHOP files around my LAN. Neener neener fucken neener. On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Karl O. Pinc <kop at meme.com> wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 14:56:07

I have a lot of files (and directories) (up to a few hundred at a time) that I get from various sources. Some time after I get them (after they are already backed up), I often have to move them around and normalize their names. When I do this, rsync sees them as unrelated to the copies of these files which are already on the backup destination. When I can't use the --delete option for various

Updated to current cvs without the --exclude-from - patch. This patch allows specifying a --link-dest path similar to --compare-dest except that unchanged files are hard-linked to the --link-dest path instead of producing a sparse tree. -- ________________________________________________________________ J.W. Schultz Pegasystems Technologies email address: jw@pegasys.ws Remember

bonjour, Je suis actuellement en derniere annee d'ecole d'ingenieur en informatique et statistiques et je dois réaliser mon projet de fin d'études sur le logiciel R. En fait, je dois réaliser un scoring sous R puis le meme sous SAS et comparer les resultats. Mon fichier se prete à une regression logistique. J'ai donc utilisé la fonction glm sous R et Catmod sous SAS seumement, je

Please CC me. I'm not subscribed. Attached is a patch against 2.5.4pre1 CVS current to add the --link-dest option so rsync will create hardlinks for unchanged regular files to a directory on the destination. This is like --compare-dest except that the result is not a sparse tree. Also included is extension to --(ex|in)clude-from to allow - for stdin. Could one of the maintainers please add

Why does --link-dest assume -ugp ? This patch removes those assumptions allowing mortal users to use --link-dest for back ups. (I think... I didn't look at the large picture.) Joe *** generator.c Thu Aug 29 09:44:55 2002 --- ../generator.c Tue Nov 4 09:12:59 2003 *************** *** 42,47 **** --- 42,50 ---- extern int modify_window; extern char *compare_dest; extern int

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- diff -urN rsync-3.0.2-orig/generator.c rsync-3.0.2/generator.c --- rsync-3.0.2-orig/generator.c 2008-03-28 10:30:11.000000000 -0700 +++ rsync-3.0.2/generator.c 2008-05-07 15:35:08.317364774 -0700 @@ -1508,6 +1508,7 @@ if (preserve_links && S_ISLNK(file->mode)) { #ifdef SUPPORT_LINKS + int iflags =

Hi all. I have just finished a small patch that adds support for multiple --compare-dest or --link-dest args. Its primary usage is to do incremental backups on top of eachother. (My current backup system stores each incremental as a single diff of the latest full.) Example: First full backup: rsync -a somedir full-20040415/ First incremental: rsync -a --compare-dest=../full-20040415 \