similar to: confusion over S3/S4 importing

Hello, I tried to fit a poisson distribution but looking at the function fitdistr() it does not optimize lambda but simply estimates the mean of the data and returns it as lambda. I'm a bit confused because I was expecting an optimization of this parameter to gain a good fit... If I would use mle() of stats4 package or mle2() of bbmle package, I would have to write the function by myself

Hi there I am trying to learn how to compute mle in R for a multinomial negative log likelihood function. I am using for this the book by B. Bolker "Ecological models and data in R", chapter 6: "Likelihood an all that". But he has no example for multinomial functions. What I did is the following: I first defined a function for the negative log likelihood:

The mle2 function (bbmle library) gives an example something like the following in its help page. How do I access the coefficients, standard errors, etc in the summary of "a"? > x <- 0:10 > y <- c(26, 17, 13, 12, 20, 5, 9, 8, 5, 4, 8) > LL <- function(ymax=15, xhalf=6) + -sum(stats::dpois(y, lambda=ymax/(1+x/xhalf), log=TRUE)) > a <- mle2(LL,

Dear developers, the implementation of S4 generics for existing S3 ones in the base package is concerned to be a threat to quick startup times [1]. But since S4 is promoted, and S3/S4 interoperability a pain when package developing [2], are there efforts to improve the situation? E.g. an S3 free system, etc. A good thing [2] is the package 'stats4', including some setGeneric calls (e.g.

I want to put the correct information into the "author" field of the DESCRIPTION file for my bbmle package, which is a modified and extended version of the mle code in the stats4 package. If I put only myself as author I feel like I'm ignoring the contribution of R-Core (and I think Peter Dalgaard in particular) in writing the original code. If I add "R Development Core

Hi all, I am trying to use plm to estimate coefficients in a model consisting of a system of equations. So far I used mle2 from the package "bbmle", but now I need to test for autocorrelation and mle2 does not provide for the necessary tests. mle2 needs a function as input that might as well consist of many different equations. plm however requires an object of class formula that needs

I'm trying to get started with maximum likelihood estimation with a simple regression equivalent out of Bolker (Ecological Models and Data in R, p302). With this code: #Basic example regression library(bbmle) RegData<-data.frame(c(0.3,0.9,0.6),c(1.7,1.1,1.5)) names(RegData)<-c("x", "y") linregfun = function(a,b,sigma) { Y.pred = a+b*x

Hi all, When I try to estimate the functional response of the Rogers type I equation (for the mle2 you need the package bbmle): > RogersIbinom <- function(N0,attackR2_B,u_B) {attackR2_B+u_B*N0} > RogersI_B <- mle2(FR~dbinom(size=N0,prob=RogersIbinom(N0,attackR2_B,u_B)/N0),start=list(attackR2_B=4.5,u_B=0.16),method="Nelder-Mead",data=data5) I get following error message

Hola! I am on debian testing, all updates up to date. I am running R via emacs and ess, so I canot know if this is an R or emacs/ess problem. What happens is that I want to read an vignette, and calls something like vignette("mle2", package="bbmle") the pdf file opens (for me in Foxit reader), no problem, but then emacs starts to spew a lot of spam, interfering with the

I am using the Ben bolker's R package "bbmle" to estimate the parameters of a binomial mixture distribution via Maximum Likelihood Method. For some data sets, I got the following warning messages: *Warning: optimization did not converge (code 1: ) There were 50 or more warnings (use warnings() to see the first 50)* Also, warnings() results the following: *In 0:(n - x) : numerical

Hi all, I have some problems with the mle2 function > RogersIIbinom <- function(N0,attackR3_B,Th3_B) {N0-lambertW(attackR3_B*Th3_B*N0*exp(-attackR3_B*(24-Th3_B*N0)))/(attackR3_B*Th3_B)} > RogersII_B <- mle2(FR~dbinom(size=N0,prob=RogersIIbinom(N0,attackR3_B,Th3_B)/N0),start=list(attackR3_B=1.5,Th3_B=0.04),method="Nelder-Mead",data=dat) Error in dbinom(x, size, prob, log)

Hi the list, I am experiencing several issues with profile.mle (and consequently with confint.mle) (stat4 version 2.9.2), and I have to spend a lot of time to find workarounds to what looks like interface bugs. I would be glad to get feedback from experienced users to know if I am really asking too much or if there is room for improvement. * Problem #1 with fixed parameters. I can't

Hi, I am using the mle2 method of the package 'bbmle'. The method is calling as far as I understood it the optim method "L-BFGS-B" (this is the method I use). The latter one allows the user to impose box constraints on the variables, i.e. to give lower and upper bounds. It is important that the initial values satisfy the constraints. In my problem, it is the case. I do not know

I want to find ML estimates of a model using mle2 in bbmle package. When I insert new parameters (for new covariates) in model the log-likelihood value does not change and the estimated value is exactly the initial value that I determined. What's the problem? This is the code and the result: As you see the estimated values for b2 , b3 and b4 are the initial values of them. The

I am having difficulty with evaluation/environment construction for a formula to be evaluated by model.matrix(). Basically, I want to construct a model matrix that first looks in "newdata" for the values of the model parameters, then in "object at data". Here's what I've tried: 1. model.matrix(~f,data=c(newdata,object at data)) -- fails because something (terms()?)

A few day ago, I was looking for an answer to my question but didn't get one. Anybody who can help now? Hello, I tried to use mle to fit a distribution(zero-inflated negbin for count data). My call is very simple: mle(ll) ll() takes the three parameters, I'd like to be estimated (size, mu and prob). But within the ll() function I have to judge if the current parameter-set gives a nice

Hi everybody, I am using the L-BFGS-B method of the mle2() function to estimate the values of 6 parameters. mle2 uses the methods implemented in optim. As I got it from the descriptions available online, one can use the parscale parameter to tell R somehow what the values of the estimated parameters should be . . . Could somebody please help me understand what one has to do actually with the

pkgA's NAMESPACE has importFrom(graphics, plot) exportClasses("A") exportMethods("plot") R/foo.R has setClass("A") setMethod("plot", "A", function(x, y, ...) {}) During R CMD INSTALL pkgA_1.0.tar.gz we are told ** preparing package for lazy loading Creating a generic function for 'plot' from package

Hello R Help, I am trying solve an MLE convergence problem: I would like to estimate four parameters, p1, p2, mu1, mu2, which relate to the probabilities, P1, P2, P3, of a multinomial (trinomial) distribution. I am using the mle2() function and feeding it a time series dataset composed of four columns: time point, number of successes in category 1, number of successes in category 2, and

Dear r-helpers, I'm experiencing some problems in fitting a maximum likelihood binomial model to some of my data. The error is in optim, which founds: Error in optim(par = c(0.2, 0.5), fn = function (p) : initial value in 'vmmin' is not finite Yes, I know it's a common problem, and I've carefully searched and readed all the posts about the issue, But, I can't find a