similar to: R CMD check with non-standard .libPaths

Using: natty alpha-2 Could anyone englighten me (or point me to a self-enlightment page) as to why when installing R using: > apt-get install revolution-mkl r-revolution-revobase revolution-r r-base-core There are 4 library paths available (installed by default): > .libPaths() [1] "/usr/local/lib/R/site-library" "/usr/lib/R/site-library" [3]

Hola a todos Les consulto por lo siguiente: hoy aparece en la actualización de mi sistema (linux open suse) la versión de R 3. Como de costumbre, informa la actualización, aceptas o rechazas, yo acepte, aparece la barrita de estado y al finalizar R 3 está en mi computadora. Al solicitar una librería informa que esta está realizada en una versión anterior a la 3, que debo reinstalarla. Por

AFAIU, 'R CMD check --as-cran' tries to hide any site and user package libraries by setting R_LIBS_SITE and R_LIBS_USER. However, contrary to R_LIBS_SITE, it fails for R_LIBS_USER and the user's personal library is still available for test scripts. Should I revise my assumptions, or is that intentional? The short version. Shouldn't: $ R_LIBS_USER='' Rscript --vanilla -e

On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 8:04 PM Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote: > > > On 18 March 2020 at 19:19, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: > | AFAIU, 'R CMD check --as-cran' tries to hide any site and user package > | libraries by setting R_LIBS_SITE and R_LIBS_USER. However, contrary > > What makes you think that? AFAIK --as-cran just sets a bunch of the (nearly

I'm the faculty member in my department who advises our IT staff on the details of installing R for students and faculty on our Windows 7 lab network. We are about to upgrade from R 3.1.1 to R 3.2.1, and once that is done, this version of R and all installed packages will be frozen in the image that appears in C:/Program Files/R/R-3.2.1/ on every lab computer, and this image is refreshed

On 7/28/2015 1:32 PM, Uwe Ligges wrote: > Just add the line > > R_LIBS_SITE=F:/R/library > > to the file R_HOME/etc/x64/Renviron.site Thanks, Uwe I have no way to test this and our IT people who do the installation know nothing of R, so follow-up questions: * There is no R_HOME/etc/x64/Renviron.site file, but there is a R_HOME/etc/Rprofile.site I can modify and ask them to

I asked a couple of months ago in r-sig-fedora about a difference I noticed between Ubuntu and RedHat/Fedora. Now I think I've figured out the cause is a little issue in packaging but I don't know how to get it fixed. On Ubuntu, the setup is like this. It i is controlled in a file called Renviron R packages built/distributed in RPM are installed to /usr/lib/R/library. R packages built

Hi all, I'm trying to check a package using R CMD check --as-cran <package>. When I do so, the check fails upon not finding the dependencies which I have installed in a non-standard location. Per the manual, I created ~/.R/check.Renviron : $ cat ~/.R/check.Renviron R_LIBS=/usr/lib64/R/library:/usr/lib64/R/var R_LIBS_SITE=/usr/lib64/R/library:/usr/lib64/R/var No luck. I tried

> .expand_R_libs_env_var("poof/%p/%v") [1] "poof/x86_64-w64-mingw32/3.4" Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 4:49 AM, Loris Bennett <loris.bennett at fu-berlin.de> wrote: > Hi, > > When I install a package as a non-root user, it gets saved in a path > such as > > ~/R/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-library/3.4 >

Hi, When I install a package as a non-root user, it gets saved in a path such as ~/R/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-library/3.4 for any R version 3.4.x. Thus, if I want to install the packages somewhere else, as root say, I might do install.packages("somepackage","/some/where/else/R/site-library/3.4") In this case I would then want to construct the appropriate path in, say,

I wonder if someone has tried to implement the hierarchical generalized linear model (HGLM) approach of Lee and Nelder (JRSSB, 1996, 58: 619-56) in R. Thanks in advance. Emmanuel Paradis At 17:18 01/04/02 +0100, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk wrote: >On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Jason Liao wrote: > >> Happy new month, everyone! >> >> I am planning to write a NIH grant proposal to study

Hi I am trying to convert SAS codes to R, but some of the result are quite different from SAS. When I ran proc mixed, I have an option ddfm=bw followed by the model. How can I show this method in R?(I am thinking that this maybe the reason that I can't get the similar results) below is my SAS codes: proc mixed data=test covtest empirical; class pair grade team school; model score = trt

Apologies for continuing to ask about this but . . in my quest to fit a gamma GLMM model to my data (see partial copy of thread below), I'm exploring using hglm today. The question of the day has to do with the errors I'm currently getting from the hglm package. Can hglm handle a model with nested random effects? I don't see an example of one of those in the package documentation. If

Hi, I have Debian Testing running on a Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Carbon (2015, 3rd gen.). I would like to have a package library independent of the installed R version. Under Ubuntu, I used to have the following line in ~/.Renviron: R_LIBS=/usr/local/R/library:/usr/lib/R/site-library This worked fine and /usr/local/R/library showed up in .libPaths(). However, under Debian (with the same ~/.Renviron),

Dear Johannes, Dear Dirk, Thanks a lot for helping. Here is the missing information. Here is how I installed R. This is basically how Martin Maechler showed me to install R under Ubuntu (in several versions so that they are also recognized by ESS). My goal is to adjust this to make it work for Debian: 1) sudo emacs /etc/apt/sources.list # then add: deb

Martin, I am aware of --vanilla; I use it myself for some testing. In this case R_LIBS_USER was set externally (part of my login) and does not involve any of the R scripts. That means it is inherited by any subprocess. For example: tmt1495% R --vanilla --no-environ R version 3.3.1 (2016-06-21) -- "Bug in Your Hair" Copyright (C) 2016 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing

On Saturday, 16 May 2020 00.38.34 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > Sorry, but I'm not sure I'm following you. How does having > /usr/lib64/R/library as system library prevent you from testing > r-devel? First the context, we are speaking of srpms. Use case: you want to test a pre-version of R before it is released and you want to do it using dnf while not having to de-install the

Hi, everybody. I've got some Centos Linux systems and some Ubuntu Linux systems. R's basically the same in either place, but the packaging of R for Debian systems seems better to me than it is on Fedora/Redhat/Centos. I joined R-sig-debian and we talk about package management issues there sometimes. One of the really handy R packaging ideas they have is to customize R environment so

Craig A Faulhaber wrote: >I am interested in using a generalized linear mixed model with data > that best fits a beta distribution (i.e., the data is bounded between > 0 and 1 but is not binomial). .. >For clarification, here's what I'm trying to model: >I have a beta-distributed response variable (y). I have a fixed-effect >explanatory variable (treatment),

Hi I am trying to install R-igraph, but when I issue the command : install.packages("igraph", lib="~/.R/library") in the R session, I get the following error: Warning in install.packages("igraph", lib = "~/.R/library") : 'lib = "~/.R/library"' is not writable Error in install.packages("igraph", lib =