similar to: Vignettes and CRAN checks

On 21/02/17 19:06, Sebastian P. Luque wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to rebuild a package (using R version 3.3.2 (2016-10-31)) > that has not seen any changes since it was last built without problems > in previous R versions. It fails during vignette building with: > > ---<--------------------cut here---------------start------------------->--- > $ R CMD build

In a package I'm working on there is a vignette with a number of graphs that result in huge .pdf files, so the .pdf for the vignette is around 17 Mb. If these graphs are converted to .png, and the .tex file is compiled with pdflatex, the resulting .pdf is ~1 Mb. I'm reluctant to put the .Rnw file into the package as is, generating the huge .pdf for the vignette. I first tried

Some questions motivated by this discussion. From the CRAN policy page: "Checking the package should take as little CPU time as possible, as the CRAN check farm is a very limited resource and there are thousands of packages. Long-running tests and vignette code can be made optional for checking, but do ensure that the checks that are left do exercise all the features of the

Almost all of the coxme package and an increasing amount of the survival package are now written in noweb, i.e., .Rnw files. It would be nice to process these using the Sweave function + a special driver, which I can do using a modified version of Sweave. The primary change is to allow the following type of construction <<coxme>> coxme <- function(formula, data, subset, blah blah

Hello, I'm trying to rebuild a package (using R version 3.3.2 (2016-10-31)) that has not seen any changes since it was last built without problems in previous R versions. It fails during vignette building with: ---<--------------------cut here---------------start------------------->--- $ R CMD build diveMove * checking for file ?diveMove/DESCRIPTION? ... OK * preparing ?diveMove?: *

Hi, as far as I understand it, the new R devel feature of processing non-Sweave vignettes will (a) locate any "[.][RrSs](nw|tex)$" or ".Rmd" files, (b) check for a registered vignette engine, (c) process the file using the registered "weave" function, (d) and possibly post process the generated weave artifact (e.g. a *.tex file). I'd like to propose to extend

I'm adding a couple of vignettes to an existing package. When I make a change to the sweave file, and run the check command, c:\conifers\trunk>R CMD check rconifers I get the following message(s) in the 00check.log file: * checking for unstated dependencies in vignettes ... OK * checking package vignettes in 'inst/doc' ... WARNING Package vignette(s) without corresponding PDF:

his is a query for suggestions on how best to setup the package for coxme. This should be ready for CRAN in about a week - I'm working out documentation details and some last test cases. The R CMD check and INSTALL processes work great on my computer. The rub is that they depend on noweb. Both algorithmicly and statistically this is the most complex bit of code I have done, and after some

Now that R 3.0.0+ supports non-Sweave vignettes, R-exts \S 1.4.2 seems to imply that it is possible to include both Sweave and knitr vignettes in a single package. I'm wondering if anyone has tried this and/or if there are some hidden gotchas putting this into practice, and concerned about creating problems with CRAN checks if I try this. Consider two vignettes: pkg/vignettes/vign1.Rnw,

[Env: OS: Win Xp; R 2.15.2; IDE: eclipse/StatET] Each time I update my heplots package, I get warnings from R CMD check on R-Forge, * checking sizes of PDF files under ?inst/doc? ... WARNING ?gs+qpdf? made some significant size reductions: compacted ?HE-examples.pdf? from 739Kb to 366Kb and upon submission to CRAN, a message from maintainers: On CRAN now: but again there were warnings

Hi, is it possible to have non-Sweave vignettes(*) in inst/doc/ be listed under 'Downloads' on CRAN package pages? For instance, in my R.rsp package I have a inst/doc/report.pdf (part of the source *.tar.gz) that is not detected/listed. The PDF is not based on a Sweave vignette but an *.tex.rsp vignette that is dynamically created via inst/doc/Makefile. It is listed (*) BTW, can the

In a package 'vig' R CMD build vig (or tools::buildVignettes(dir="vig") with $ cat vig/vignettes/vig1.Rnw \documentclass{article} \begin{document} <<>>= x <- 1 @ \end{document} $ cat vig/vignettes/vig2.Rnw \documentclass{article} \begin{document} <<>>= x @ \end{document} produces vig2.pdf where x is defined with value 1 -- the vignettes share a build

It is stated in R-exts that Sweave files (.Rnw) are either processed in /vignettes or /inst/doc, not both. Furthermore, it is stated that external manuals and other files in /inst/doc will be installed. This behaviour has been used to deal with the situation where a package has two "vignettes", one that is easily processed and one that has a long running time. This could be done by

Dear R-devel list, My name is Guillermo Vinu?. I have created an R package that includes a vignette. Earlier on, to test my package, I tried to install it both in Linux and Windows and it worked. My vignette was in /inst/doc. Now, I have finished for good and before submitting my package to CRAN I've tried to install it again first in Linux and then in Windows (I removed that first

I am looking for a way to generate .Rout.save files for vignettes. The manual "Writing R Extensions" states here [1] in item number 20: "If there is a target output file .Rout.save in the vignette source directory, the output from running the code in that vignette is compared with the target output file." Yet, there is no pointer on how to get the correct .Rout.save files

I?m preparing a package (fastR) for submission to CRAN, but the vignette index keeps going AWOL, or at least R CMD check ?as-cran thinks so. I?ve tried several things and gave myself the weekend to think of other things, but I can?t figure it out. Perhaps someone on the list can lend a hand. Here?s one example situation, where I build the index.html file myself and put it in inst/doc/index.html

Hi all, I'm writing a vignette for my package, and I would like to include some of the package help files in there as well. Is there an easy way of doing so? I tried using R CMD Rdconv to generate latex files from .Rd files but I am not sure how to include these into a .Rnw file (ie the vignette source). The resulting file from Rdconv do not readily compile using latex ... The other option I

Hi, I have a package for which I'm writing a vignette. The vignette looks fine as indicated by R CMD check. However after installing the package (in my personal R library location) doing vignette('rcdk') says Warning message: vignette 'rcdk' *not* found But I can see the PDF file located under rcdk/doc in the R library directory. The header of the Rnw file is %

During vignette generation on Windows, Sweave seems to clean up before all graphics files are completely processed. For instance, if tmp.Rnw is: \documentclass[12pt]{article} \begin{document} <<>>= bitmap("afile.png") plot(1:100) dev.off() @ \end{document} Then: C:\R\tmp>R CMD Sweave tmp.Rnw Writing to file tmp.tex Processing code chunks ... 1 : echo term verbatim

[Env: Win Xp / StatET 2.0 / R 2.15.0] In my heplots package I extended the HE-examples.Rnw vignette under inst/doc. The package passes R CMD check on my machine: * using log directory 'C:/eclipse-3.7/heplots.Rcheck' * using R version 2.15.0 (2012-03-30) * using platform: i386-pc-mingw32 (32-bit) ... * checking sizes of PDF files under 'inst/doc' ... OK * checking installed files