similar to: How to convert data to 'normal' if they are in the form of standard scientific notations?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "How to convert data to 'normal' if they are in the form of standard scientific notations?"

2013 Mar 06
2
How to combine conditional argument and logical argument in R to create subset of data...
Dear R user I have data created using code below b<-matrix(2:21,nrow=4) b[,1:3]=NA b[4,2]=5 b[3,1]=6 Now the data is > b [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [1,] NA NA NA 14 18 [2,] NA NA NA 15 19 [3,] 6 NA NA 16 20 [4,] NA 5 NA 17 21 I want to keep data in column 4 greater than 15 and the value in column 1 & 2 either greater than 4
2005 May 12
2
load data with scientific notations
Hi, I have a data file whose values are scientific notations, for example: 9.1642537e+003, 6.7195295e+003, 4.8834487e+003, 3.7181589e+003, ... How to load such data into R? Thanks, -Luke
2017 Jul 24
4
[Bug 2747] New: Different notations for the same IP-address result in multiple entries in known_hosts
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2747 Bug ID: 2747 Summary: Different notations for the same IP-address result in multiple entries in known_hosts Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.5p1 Hardware: Other OS: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5
2020 Jul 19
3
[Bug 1444] New: nftables-0.9.6 crashes on some set notations:
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1444 Bug ID: 1444 Summary: nftables-0.9.6 crashes on some set notations: Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org
2016 Apr 11
0
[PATCH] nouveau: Switch perms from macros to octal notations, module params readable to everyone
From: poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> Switch from "silly" S_* macros to "definitely more readable" octal "way" permissions, moreover to not "so restrictive" module parameters permissions. Suggested-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> Fixes: poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> Tested-by: poma <pomidorabelisima at
2003 Mar 16
0
scientific notation
If I knew this, I have forgotten it: Is there a way to force R to forgo use of scientific notation, e.g. to use .000029 instead of 2.9e-05? (Aside from using formatC for example) I run across this every now and then and work around it (multiple values by 100, for example) but cannot find any way to deal with it otherwise. A particularly problematic place it pops up is in axis tick labels.
2014 Jun 19
1
R is converting arg input to scientific notation, which is bad!
Hello, Firstly, real new to R here. I have a function intended to evaluate the values in columns spread over many tables. I have an argument in the function that allows the user to input what sequence of tables they want to draw data from. The function seems to work fine, but when the user inputs a single number (over 9) instead of a sequence using the : operator, I find an error message: the
2010 Sep 27
1
scientific vs. fixed notation in xyplot()
Hi I am using xyplot() to plot on the log scale by using scale=list(log=T) argument. For example: xyplot(1:10~1:10, scales=list(log=T)) But the axis labels are printed as scientific notation (10^0.0, etc), instead of fixed notation. How can I change that to fixed notation? options(scipen=4) doesn't work on xyplot() Thanks John
2010 Feb 02
2
Suppressing scientific notation on plot axis tick labels
Is there a better alternative to x = c(1e7, 2e7) x.lb = c(0,1e7,2e7) s.lb = format(x.lb, scientific = FALSE, big.mark = ",") barplot(x, yaxt = "n", ylab = "") axis(side = 2, at = x.lb, labels = s.lb) (I am sure there is a better alternative to line 2 :)). Thank you. -- View this message in context:
2009 Sep 29
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] llvm-bcanalyzer: print percentages without scientific notation
Hello, llvm-bcanalyzer told me that the size of the BLOCKINFO_BLOCK of my file is "1.345017e+01" percent of the whole file. This is not very readable. The attached patch prints the percentage without scientific notation so we get something bit more readable: Block ID #0 (BLOCKINFO_BLOCK): Num Instances: 1 Total Size: 637b/79.62B/19W % of file: 13.450169 Num
2009 Sep 29
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] llvm-bcanalyzer: print percentages without scientific notation
Hi, Andreas Neustifter <astifter-llvm at gmx.at> writes: > Maybe you can use the already available "include/llvm/Support/Format.h"? Thanks, that simplifies the patch a lot. See the attached patch. Btw, llvm-bcanalyzer.cpp seems to also use fprintf -- does mixing it with errs() cause problems and should it be converted to use format()? best regards, Timo Lindfors
2009 Sep 29
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] llvm-bcanalyzer: print percentages without scientific notation
On Sep 29, 2009, at 9:44 AM, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: > Hi, > > Andreas Neustifter <astifter-llvm at gmx.at> writes: >> Maybe you can use the already available "include/llvm/Support/ >> Format.h"? > > Thanks, that simplifies the patch a lot. See the attached patch. It looks like something similar got applied back in r82772 on 9/25. > > Btw,
2003 Feb 06
1
signif {base}: changes to scientific notation
PROBLEM `signif' does change to scientic notation at different levels depending on the number of significant digits in the input. This can generate tables where figures change ``irregularly'' from normal to scientific notation. PROPOSAL The change to the scientific notation should be made only if the figure in scientific notation - with potentially as
2010 Feb 02
0
[R] Suppressing scientific notation on plot axis tick labels (PR#14203)
murdoch at stats.uwo.ca wrote: > On 02/02/2010 6:20 AM, Dimitri Shvorob wrote: >> Ruben Roa has kindly suggested using 'scipen' option - cf. >> >>> fixed notation will be preferred unless it is more than =C3=A2=E2=82=AC= =CB=9Cscipen=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=E2=84=A2 digits >>> wider. >> However,=20 >> >> options(scipen =3D 50) >> x =3D
2013 Jan 02
1
scientific notation and comparison with character variable
L.S. Is the following expected and/or documented? > 1e-2 < "0.05" [1] TRUE > 1e-4 < "0.05" [1] FALSE Many thanks in advance for any pointer. Best, Tobias > sessionInfo() R Under development (unstable) (2013-01-01 r61512) Platform: i386-w64-mingw32/i386 (32-bit) locale: [1] LC_COLLATE=English_United States.1252 [2] LC_CTYPE=English_United States.1252 [3]
2019 Mar 22
1
prettyNum digits=0 not compatible with scientific notation
> On 22 Mar 2019, at 18:07 , Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: > > gives (on Linux R 3.5.3, Fedora 28) > > d=10 d=7 d=2 d=1 d=0 > [1,] "123456" "123456" "123456" "1e+05" "%#4.0-1e" > [2,] "12345.6" "12345.6" "12346"
2001 Jan 17
1
Scientific notation?
Hi, Would there be a function and/or some options to force R to write a value of say 1.0e-4 as "0.0001"? More specifically I want to use R to write ASCII file(s) for other programs to read and some of these programs don't know how to deal numbers in scientific notation or have a different convention. Thanks in advance. Yves Gauvreau B.E.F.P. Universit? du Qu?bec ? Montr?al cyg at
2003 Jan 31
1
Scientific Notation on tick marks
Hi, I was working on a project for my class and I am trying to make sure the y-axis numbers NEVER convert automatically to scientific notation. Is there anything I can set in the plot function to make sure of this? I know formatC( ) can be used in the axis function, but it seems to give me an error when using it in the plot function. Thanks, student-in-need-of-some-help
2006 Jan 24
1
No scientific notation in format
Hi I have a data.frame with the following numbers (first column are month numbers) 07,0,0,0,0.315444056314174,0,0,0,12.5827462764176,0.079194498691732, 0.0280828101707015,0,0.0695808222378877 08,0,0,105600,0.393061160316545,0,0,0,8.95551253153947,0.0880023174276553, 0.285714285714286,0,0.0669139911789158 09,0,0,0,0,12.5,0,0,13.5135887094281,0.0557531529154668,0,0, 0.0487526139182026
2006 Apr 28
1
displaying numbers not in scientific notation
Sorry for asking such a simple question, but I couldn't find the answer through a search... How can I get R to show me the values of estimates *not* in scientific notation? When I use summary() after using lm() I am getting numbers like 4.485107e-01, when what I want to see is 0.4485.... Thanks, Brian