similar to: Linking to C type short?

Function factor() in the current development version (2009-05-22) guarantees that levels are different character strings. However, they may represent the same decimal number. The following example is derived from a posting by Stavros Macrakis in thread "Match .3 in a sequence" in March nums <- 0.3 + 2e-16 * c(-2,-1,1,2) f <- factor(nums) levels(f) # [1]

On 4/3/23 15:50, Michael Milton wrote: > Okay, but I'm afraid this will only mean something to Rust users. The > reason being that we encountered this issue in extendr: a Rust > extension library for R. The specific compiler errors we encounter > happen because bindgen (the Rust code generation library) read the > changed R header files, and generated a new type definition

Hello, I am trying to call the BLAS Level1 function zdotc from R via a .C call like this: #include "R.h" #include "R_ext/BLAS.h" void testzdotc() { Rcomplex zx[3], zy[3], ret_val; zx[0].r = 1.0; zx[0].i = 0.0; zx[1].r = 2.0; zx[0].i = 0.0; zx[2].r = 3.0; zx[0].i = 0.0; zy[0].r = 1.0; zy[0].i = 0.0; zy[1].r = 2.0; zy[0].i = 0.0; zy[2].r = 3.0;

Hi Tomas, Thanks for this explanation. As you can probably tell I'm not much of a C person, so I didn't realise this change would be invisible to C users. I suppose R's stability contract only applies to C, and therefore changes that break other languages such as Rust are out of scope. You are right that this error is confused by bindgen's inability to handle anonymous types, but

On Aug 8, 2009, at 23:11, Didier Dambrin wrote: > Electronic music quite often doesn't leave a computer these days. > And it > mainly consists of drums, synths & vocals/effects. Drums are often > samples > sequenced at sample (not sub-sample) accuracy, thus repeated (of > course if > the song was post-resampled, there will be sub-sample times). Good point. I

o `Rcomplex' is preferred to `complex' (a future reserved word in C) for R complex objects passed to C. I'm a bit confused here. Is "complex" or "Rcomplex" the future reserved word in C (I thought "complex" already was, but I'm not a C programmer) and is this because R storage modes should or should not have names corresponding to C reserved

Hey I am trying to setup a dovecot cluster with 2 servers using replication /dsync. In front of it I got a Fortinet ADC (Load balance) and I think that I messing up the dsync. I see mails duplicated in the sync progress. If I disable one of the servers in the ADC, it seems to work and the sync if working without a problem. But if I use both servers with a round robin on the ADC, I see mailed

Hey I got a server setup where the Postfix and dovecot is on separated servers. In the postfis log is goes like this on mail in: Jul 26 10:23:13 edimailsl2 postfix/smtpd[12812]: 41blTs18Bzz40nl: client=unknown[172.0.0.12] Jul 26 10:23:21 edimailsl2 postfix/cleanup[12825]: 41blTs18Bzz40nl: message-id=<> Jul 26 10:23:21 edimailsl2 postfix/qmgr[10666]: 41blTs18Bzz40nl: from=<tk at

On 4/3/23 14:07, Michael Milton wrote: > Hi all, > > There seems to have been a breaking change in the R trunk caused by a fix > to bug 18430 <https://bugs.r-project.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18430> that > relates to the layout of the Rcomplex typedef. Previously it was a struct, > but now it's a union by default >

Full_Name: Christian Marquardt Version: 2.2.1 OS: Linux Submission from: (NULL) (84.167.229.240) Hello, I believe this is a bug in the configuration / installation: When configuring R-2.2.1 using the Intel v9 Fortran compiler as default Fortran compiler and g++ as C++ compiler on a Suse 9.3 Linux, the configuration script finds that the C and Fortran idea of double comples disagree. I have

Thank you for the patch. To clarify: this is not a bug. ?.C says The mapping of the types of R arguments to C or Fortran arguments in '.C' or '.Fortran' is R C Fortran integer int * integer numeric double * double precision - or - float * real complex Rcomplex * double complex

Full_Name: Peter Fortini Version: 2.0.1 OS: Windows 2000 Submission from: (NULL) (65.246.187.164) When the imaginary part of the argument is very large, the complex tangent function returns 0+NaNi. For example, tan(1+1000i)=0+NaNi; it should be 0+1i Easy to fix in complex.c, as the original NaN came from division of sinh and cosh that had reached machine infinity. static void z_tan(Rcomplex

Hi, I would like to report a small bug in one of the code examples given in the 'Writing R extensions' manual. Section 5.9.2 ("Calling .External") defines the function "showArgs" in order to demonstrate how to access in C the pair-listed arguments passed by .External. The function aims at printing echoing all passed arguments to the screen but only prints every

Dear All I'm currently developing a package for R (1.9.0) on Win32, with C++ source code. Having followed the instructions in readme.packages, my code compiles fine with R CMD SHLIB (as well as R CMD check) ... until I start using the internal R functions. (Interesting: Rprintf seems to be the exception.) For instance, the following code compiles fine: #include <R.h> #include

Currently, I load the RData file then ls() and str(). But loading the file takes too long if the file is big. Most of the time, I only interested what the variables are in the the file and the attributes of the variables (like if it is a data.frame, matrix, what are the colnames/rownames, etc.) I'm wondering if there is any facility in R to help me avoid loading the whole file.

Hi all, There seems to have been a breaking change in the R trunk caused by a fix to bug 18430 <https://bugs.r-project.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18430> that relates to the layout of the Rcomplex typedef. Previously it was a struct, but now it's a union by default

I've been trying to learn about dynamically loading subroutines in R. Ultimately I would like to use this approach to implement some simulations. For the moment though, I've run into a problem compiling c++ code and loading it into R. The 'C/C++' and 'R'code below works fine when compiled and linked with gcc, but gives an error when the library is compiled and linked with

Hello. I've been pulling together a Debian package out of Maxence Guesdon's OCaml bindings for R. Will be available from my website as soon as I get my router to obey me. Here's Maxence's bindings: http://pauillac.inria.fr/~guesdon/ocaml-r.en.html The purpose of this software is to access R from OCaml programs. However, my issue is that after having pulled things to a Debian

Hello. I've been pulling together a Debian package out of Maxence Guesdon's OCaml bindings for R. Will be available from my website as soon as I get my router to obey me. Here's Maxence's bindings: http://pauillac.inria.fr/~guesdon/ocaml-r.en.html The purpose of this software is to access R from OCaml programs. However, my issue is that after having pulled things to a Debian

Hi all, im triyng to implement a bayesian model with R and c++. I have a strange problem. I can't reproduce the error with a small script and then i post the original one. The problem is after the line for(MCMC_iter2=0;MCMC_iter2<thin;MCMC_iter2++) For the first 34 iterations all work fine, after, all the simulations of mu_acc_P return an "nan". If i delete the line