similar to: 'identical' and the warning "ignoring non-pairlist attributes"

Hi list, I was testing out the "doSMP" package from REvolutionR in my regular R2.11.0 installation and I got the following error message.? Well, one obvious thing is that R2.11.0 was built using "i386-pc-mingw32" which is different from what revoIPC used.? I could just use REvolutionR, but all my R peripherals were set up to work with the regular R2.11.0.? So, I really want

Hi, I'm using R-2.12 on a linux 64bit machine. When I run a chunk of code inside a foreach() %do% { ...} or %dopar% {...} (with doMC backend) I keep getting a segfault. Running the *same* code within lapply(something, function(x) ... ) doesn't result in any segfaults. I'll paste the output below, but I'm not sure it would be helpful. I'm more curious how to go about smoking

Dear R-help-list I have two character vectors a <- c("A", "B", "C") b <- c("A", "C", "B") Then sapply(a, function(i) grep(i, b)) computes the permutation of the entries in 'b' needed to bring 'b' into the same order as 'a'. I have searched around, but haven't been able to find any existing function

Hi, I seem to not be able to assign NULL to an element of a pairlist without causing it to be coerced to a plain list. For example: > x <- pairlist(1, 2) > class(x) [1] "pairlist" > x[1] <- list(NULL) > class(x) [1] "list" This actually true for all [()<- assignments regardless of list value, e.g. > x <- pairlist(1, 2) > x[1] <- list(0) [1]

Michael, thanks for this info. I've stumbled upon this in a case where I walk an R expression (the AST) and (optionally) modifies it (part of the globals package). In R expressions, a function definition uses a pairlist to represent the arguments. For example, > expr <- quote(function(x = 1) x) > str(as.list(expr)) List of 4 $ : symbol function $ :Dotted pair list of 1 ..$ x:

The coercion is probably the most viable workaround for now, as it's consistent with what happens internally for calls. All pairlists/calls are converted to list for subassignment, but only calls are converted back. My guess is that the intent was for users to move from using a pairlist to the "new" (almost 20 years ago) list. In my opinion, consistency trumps "convenience"

>>>>> Michael Lawrence <lawrence.michael at gene.com> >>>>> on Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:21:13 -0700 writes: > Thanks, this was what I expected. There is a desire to > eliminate the usage of pairlist from user code, which > suggests the alternative of allowing for function > arguments to be stored in lists. That's a much deeper

On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: > On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Martin Maechler > <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: >>>>>>> Michael Lawrence <lawrence.michael at gene.com> >>>>>>> on Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:21:13 -0700 writes: >> >> > Thanks, this was what I expected. There is a desire to >>

Hi Henrik, It would help to understand your use case for pairlists. Thanks, Michael On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Michael Lawrence <michafla at gene.com> wrote: > The coercion is probably the most viable workaround for now, as it's > consistent with what happens internally for calls. All pairlists/calls > are converted to list for subassignment, but only calls are

Hello from Bioconductor, I'm developing a package to share R objects across clusters using boost library. The concept is similar to mmap package: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mmap/index.html . However, I have a problem when I was trying to write Dataptr_method for the alternative string. Based on my understanding, the return value of the Dataptr_method function should be a vector

Hi The following attempt to minimize memory consumption fails. m1 <- Matrix(c(rep(1,1000), rep(0,2000)), 1500) m2 <- as(m1, "ngCMatrix") Then m1 %*% c(1,2) produces the desired matrix product, while m2 %*% c(1,2) results in the error Error in x %*% y : Cholmod error 'invalid xtype' at file:../MatrixOps/cholmod_sdmult.c, line 82 I might be making a wrong

R-developers Does anybody know how I incorporate the use of the tracker in RUnit in the unit tests? I have read the RUnit Vignette, help pages and searched around, but I could find no examples of using 'inspect' in the unit test functions. Moreover, doing so, I tried something like library(RUnit) myFunction <- function(x) { return(x) } track <- tracker() track$init()

In the Value section of the 'seq' help page it says 'seq_along' and 'seq_length' always return an integer vector. I believe it should be 'seq_along' and 'seq_len' always return an integer vector. as there are no seq_length function? Best, Niels -- Niels Richard Hansen Web: www.math.ku.dk/~richard Associate Professor

Thanks, this was what I expected. There is a desire to eliminate the usage of pairlist from user code, which suggests the alternative of allowing for function arguments to be stored in lists. That's a much deeper change though. On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Henrik Bengtsson <henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com> wrote: > Michael, thanks for this info. > > I've stumbled upon

Dear R-developers I came across the following issue, which I find strange: setClass("A", representation(a = "numeric")) B <- list() myA <- new("A", a = 1) B$otherA <- myA B$otherA at a <- 2 myA at a Assigning a new value to slot 'a' in the _copy_ of myA stored in B$otherA changes the original value of myA -- this was surprising to me, and I

Dear all, It seems that as.pairlist does not convert call objects, producing results like the following: > is.pairlist(as.pairlist(quote(x + y))) [1] FALSE Should this behavior be expected? Thanks, Jialin > sessionInfo() R version 3.4.1 (2017-06-30) Platform: x86_64-suse-linux-gnu (64-bit) Running under: openSUSE Tumbleweed Matrix products: default BLAS: /usr/lib64/R/lib/libRblas.so

Hi, ?pairlist gives no explanation about what exactly is the difference between a pairlist and a list (except that a pairlist of length 0 is 'NULL'). So, what's a pairlist? class(.Options) [1] "pairlist" Some strange things about the "pairlist" type: > showClass("pairlist") Error in getClass(Class) : "pairlist" is not a defined class

Full_Name: Glen Herrmannsfeldt Version: 2.2.1 OS: Linux Submission from: (NULL) (128.95.113.77) Following the discussion in "Writing R Extensions" in section 5.8.2, there is no indication that showArgs expects a pairlist() instead of a list(). I was trying .Call("showArgs",list(one=1,two=2,three=3)) for example, and getting many core dumps. It wasn't until reading

Is this a feature/bug or am I missing something: R : Copyright 1999, The R Development Core Team Version 0.63.2 (January 12, 1999) ...... > ls() character(0) > x <- NULL > x$x1 <- rnorm(10) > x$x2 <- rnorm(10) > mode(x) [1] "pairlist" > as.data.frame(x) Error: can't coerce pairlist into a

On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: >>>>>> Michael Lawrence <lawrence.michael at gene.com> >>>>>> on Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:21:13 -0700 writes: > > > Thanks, this was what I expected. There is a desire to > > eliminate the usage of pairlist from user code, which > >