similar to: Trying to understand the search path and namespaces

You normally see these errors when compiling on a vm that has very little memory. Hadley On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Ben Tupper <btupper at bigelow.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I am getting a fresh CentOS 6.7 machine set up with all of the goodies for R 3.2.3, including dplyr package. I am unable to successfully install it. Below I show the failed installation using

Hello, I am getting a fresh CentOS 6.7 machine set up with all of the goodies for R 3.2.3, including dplyr package. I am unable to successfully install it. Below I show the failed installation using utils::install.packages() and then again using devtools::install_github(). Each yields an error similar to the other but not quite exactly the same - the error messages sail right over my head. I

I am trying to learn how to run the unit tests in the stringr package and have the following questions. 1) The r-cran-stringr package does not suggest/depend on the r-cran-testthat package . Would it make sense to add such a thing since after all the tests in /usr/lib/R/site-library/stringr/tests rely on testthat package? 2) I am getting the following error when trying to run the unit tests %

Dear all, It looks like I do not grasp the concept of masked functions enough as to solve this trivial problem. The code that replicates the problem (a source code tree that realizes a R package actually) is under github so one can call it clone it easily from the command line (though more experienced users will spot the problem by browsing through the package code): git clone http://jcborras at

# testthat Testing your code is normally painful and boring. `testthat` tries to make testing as fun as possible, so that you get a visceral satisfaction from writing tests. Testing should be fun, not a drag, so you do it all the time. To make that happen, `testthat`: * Provides functions that make it easy to describe what you expect a function to do, including catching errors, warnings and

# testthat Testing your code is normally painful and boring. `testthat` tries to make testing as fun as possible, so that you get a visceral satisfaction from writing tests. Testing should be fun, not a drag, so you do it all the time. To make that happen, `testthat`: * Provides functions that make it easy to describe what you expect a function to do, including catching errors, warnings and

Dear R team, Are suggested dependencies mandatory in context of `R CMD check` when using env var `_R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS_=FALSE`? Suggested dependencies are nice because are optional. But that feature often isn't valid when trying to run `R CMD check` on them. I would like to use `export _R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS_=FALSE`, which according to the comment in `tools/R/check.R`: > The

Dear R-devs, Scenario: When checking a package via `R CMD check package_tar.ball`, required / suggested packages may be missing. R subsequently returns a list of packages that are missing (delimited by spaces). Example: ``` R CMD check glmSparseNet_0.99.13.tar.gz * using log directory '/home/ubuntu/Bioconductor/glmSparseNet.Rcheck' * using R Under development (unstable) (2018-06-06

I've had a lot of requests for additions to the reproducible research task view that fall into a grey area (to me at least). For example, roxygen2 is a tool that broadly enable reproducibility but I see it more as a tool for better programming. I'm about to check in a new version of the task view that includes packrat and checkpoint, as they seem closer to reproducible research, but also

# testthat Testing your code is normally painful and boring. `testthat` tries to make testing as fun as possible, so that you get a visceral satisfaction from writing tests. Testing should be fun, not a drag, so you do it all the time. To make that happen, `testthat`: * Provides functions that make it easy to describe what you expect a function to do, including catching errors, warnings and

# testthat Testing your code is normally painful and boring. `testthat` tries to make testing as fun as possible, so that you get a visceral satisfaction from writing tests. Testing should be fun, not a drag, so you do it all the time. To make that happen, `testthat`: * Provides functions that make it easy to describe what you expect a function to do, including catching errors, warnings and

Hi! The problem is that the test environment inherits from the global environment. See https://github.com/hadley/testthat/blob/master/R/test-files.r The students labs are simply an R script file. Say that they have an assignment to calculate sqrt(2) and store it in variable a. In the same session they should be able to test the script file when they are done (using a function mark_my_file() in

Jan and Hadley, There's also the issue of tests, vignettes, or examples requiring Suggested packages (one of the core applications of Suggests, in fact). These are all checked by R CMD check, so to ensure any package which should pass check would do so without suggested packages installed would require turning all of those checks off, which takes quite a few of the teeth out of R CMD check

Hello everybody, as a young/unexperienced R package developer (only a few, mainly for personal use) i was thinking it could be very useful having a "meta" task view for all package-development related packages and/or function. Something like ... Creation - utils::package.skeleton, pkgKitten, Rcpp::Rcpp.package.skeleton Foreign languages interfaces: - Rcpp Documentation - roxygen2

Hi Accesses the $new method for a class defined in a package fails if the methods package is not loaded. I have created a test package with the following single code file: newTest <- function() { cl <- get("someClass") cl$new } someClass <- setRefClass("someClass") (This is similar to code actually used in the testthat package.) If methods is not loaded,

Hello, I'm writing a script that automates the testing of reverse dependencies of a package. I found the function testInstalledPackage in the tools package, which seems to do what I want. However, when I use it for a source package that was installed with --install-tests, I've noticed that only the actual test files (e.g. located in inst/tests) are available and run. In other words the

Hi I found a weird problem in testthat while working with an ALTREP package. The package name is AltWrapper. My ALTREP serialize function is called even when I'm trying to serialize a non-ALTREP object. Here is an example ``` context("altrep") length_func<-function(x){ return(length(x)) } setAltClass(className = "test", classType = "real")

Dear Raju I agree to Dirk that this is not really the best place for these matters, but as I got curious, I checked and found you should use test_package() and not test_dir(), as the latter does not load unexported functions of the package (such as check_string()) that may occur in the tests. For packaging of r-cran-stringr, it is probably most efficient to file a bug report there because of

# devtools The aim of `devtools` is to make your life as a package developer easier by providing R functions that simplify many common tasks. Devtools is opinionated about how to do package development, and requires that you use `roxygen2` for documentation and `testthat` for testing. Future version will relax these opinions - patches are welcome! You can track (and contribute to) development of

# devtools The aim of `devtools` is to make your life as a package developer easier by providing R functions that simplify many common tasks. Devtools is opinionated about how to do package development, and requires that you use `roxygen2` for documentation and `testthat` for testing. Future version will relax these opinions - patches are welcome! You can track (and contribute to) development of