similar to: Sexpr in package.Rd fails

Hi, The following command: R CMD Rd2pdf --no-preview --output=./tmp.pdf --title=test genefu-package.Rd run against this file: https://hedgehog.fhcrc.org/bioconductor/trunk/madman/Rpacks/genefu/man/genefu-package.Rd (username: readonly; password: readonly) produces a very verbose error (see below) with R version 2.15.0 alpha (2012-03-07 r58622). The .Rd file has these lines in it: Version: \tab

Hello, Here's an example that renders correctly using Rd2txt / Rd2latex / R CMD Rd2pdf, but has problems under Rd2HTML: \name{foo} \title{foo} \section{foo}{ This should be on a separate paragraph This should be on a separate paragraph This should be on a separate paragraph \Sexpr[stage=render,results=rd]{ paste( rep('Sexpr: This should be on a separate

Hi, another Rd related issue I encountered is that if an error occurs in an \Sexpr in an Rd file, then on get the following error: * checking for portable compilation flags in Makevars ... OK * checking for portable use of $(BLAS_LIBS) and $(LAPACK_LIBS) ... OK * checking examples ... ERROR Error in paste(before, x, after, sep = "") : object 'exfile' not found Execution halted

Hi, I have spent a few hours on the R-exts manual and the documentation of parse_Rd() (as well as the PDF document in the references), but I still have not figured out what results=rd means. I thought I could use an R code fragment to create an Rd fragment dynamically. Here is an example, in which I was expected the output to be a describe list <DL> in HTML, but it turns out not to be true.

PkgA has a single R/binding.R file containing .A <- setRefClass("A", methods=list(initialize=function(...) {})) .onLoad <- function(...) .A() A NAMESPACE with import(methods) exportClasses("A") and DESCRIPTION Package: PkgA Type: Package Title: Documenting reference classes Version: 0.0.1 Date: 2012-08-05 Author: Martin

Hi all, I am trying to use \Sexpr{} within \examples{} in the manual, and it all works fine, except that I get an error and then a NOTE from R CMD check when it checks for long lines in the manual. The long line check calls `Rd2txt` with fragment = TRUE, because it only checks the \usage{} and \examples{} sections, but fragment = TRUE does not evaluate \Sexpr{}, and then an unevaluated \Sexpr{}

Hi, I'm having a little issue with \Sexpr{bla} relating to the number of digits it is using to print its output. I understand that what \Sexpr{bla} does is parsing 'bla' inside R and then returns it coerced into a character string. The problem I'm having is that I'm losing control over the number of digits it's using to print it's output. For example, let's take:

>>>>> Martin Morgan <mtmorgan at fredhutch.org> >>>>> on Mon, 11 May 2015 10:18:07 -0700 writes: > On 05/10/2015 08:19 AM, Martin Morgan wrote: >> Loading an S4 object from a file without first loading the library sometimes (?, >> the example below and actual example involves a virtual base class and the show >> generic)

I have come across an apparent bug in the operation of Sweave. If I load the package R2HTML then execution of \Sexpr{} in an *.Rnw file no longer works. The \Sexpr{} code is simply written to the *.tex file. Below are my *.Rnw file, commands, and output. The Sweave file, Sweave-test-1_short.Rnw: % -*- mode: noweb; noweb-default-code-mode: R-mode; -*- \documentclass{article} \title{A Test

On 12/07/2018 7:30 AM, G?bor Cs?rdi wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:23 PM Duncan Murdoch > <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 12/07/2018 6:33 AM, G?bor Cs?rdi wrote: >>> I would like to create \examples{} in the manual dynamically, and >>> while it is possible to do this with a \Sexpr at the top level, R CMD >>> check issues a

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:23 PM Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 12/07/2018 6:33 AM, G?bor Cs?rdi wrote: > > I would like to create \examples{} in the manual dynamically, and > > while it is possible to do this with a \Sexpr at the top level, R CMD > > check issues a warning for it. (See below.) > > > > Is it intentional that

# HG changeset patch # User Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@suse.com> # Date 1360861948 -3600 # Node ID 0f9c7503650fa1b1103b769e1129d66ff614b2ad # Parent cffb489a6df37d8d114e7d2d53a7a85d14e8f968 tools/xend: Only add cpuid and cpuid_check to sexpr once When converting a XendConfig object to sexpr, cpuid and cpuid_check were being emitted twice in the resulting sexpr. The first conversion writes

Dear List, First off, my deepest gratitude to the Sweave developers: this tool has improved my quality greatly. A question in my work I use \Sexpr{} statements scalar values and the xtable package for all manner of tables. What I'd like to do is to use a vector inline, rather than a whole separate table. Something like: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% begin code % Latex junk % Sweave block:

I would like to create \examples{} in the manual dynamically, and while it is possible to do this with a \Sexpr at the top level, R CMD check issues a warning for it. (See below.) Is it intentional that \Sexpr is not allowed at the top level? The Rd grammar allows this, but R CMD check does not. Is there any other way to generate/modify the \examples{} section dynamically? Thanks, Gabor In

Hi, I want 3 digits printed even if the last one is zero with \Sexpr{} For example: > ghg.06[12] [1] 0.2501008 I want: 0.250 What I've tried: \Sexpr{round(ghg.06[12],3)} 0.25 \Sexpr{format(ghg.06[12])} % set options(digits=3) in earlier rnw chunk 0.25 \Sexpr{round(ghg.06[12],4} %but I want 3 not 4 digits 0.2501 Thanks in advance. Elizabeth Stanny epstanny at gmail.com

Hi all, On FC5, using: Version 2.3.1 Patched (2006-08-06 r38829) and today's R version 2.4.0 alpha (2006-09-19 r39397) with the following .Rnw file: \documentclass[10pt]{article} \begin{document} This line should print '2': \Sexpr{1 + 1} %% This line should NOT print '2': \Sexpr{1 + 1} \end{document} The \Sexpr in the second line is processed even though the

Hi all, On FC5, using: Version 2.3.1 Patched (2006-08-06 r38829) and today's R version 2.4.0 alpha (2006-09-19 r39397) with the following .Rnw file: \documentclass[10pt]{article} \begin{document} This line should print '2': \Sexpr{1 + 1} %% This line should NOT print '2': \Sexpr{1 + 1} \end{document} The \Sexpr in the second line is processed even though the

Hi all, Currently Sweave does not format the (especially numeric) value in \Sexpr{}, and I often have to round() the numbers explicitly, otherwise I will get more than 10 digits, which is not necessary for me in most cases. Is there a way to specify the number of digits to be kept for values in \Sexpr{}? e.g. can we make \Sexpr{} respect getOption('digits')? Thanks! Regards, Yihui --

Marc, >I have a large .Rnw file and was in the process of doing some debugging. >I had set some R chunks to 'eval=false' in the process. This resulted in >some R objects not being created that were in turn used in the >subsequent \Sexpr's. I have often the same problem, I'm using a construct like : <<eval=F>>= x <- rnorm(100) @ I have

Hi: I am trying to create a dynamic latex table using \Sexpr{} but it's not evaluating it. I also tried the example below without Sweave and also fails. I have also copied the Sweave.sty to my working directory but nothing seems to work. Do I need to have certain package in order to run \Sexpr{}? \documentclass[a4paper]{article} \usepackage{C:/R/R-2.8.1/share/texmf/Sweave} \begin{document}