similar to: Broken installer (PR#14083)

Hi, is there any chance to install glmnet with gcc-4.5.2? For me it fails on all systems with: trying URL 'http://mirrors.softliste.de/cran/src/contrib/glmnet_1.7.tar.gz' Content type 'application/x-gzip' length 522888 bytes (510 Kb) opened URL ================================================== downloaded 510 Kb * installing *source* package ?glmnet? ... This package has only

On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 09:50:30AM +0100, James Aylett wrote: > Note that I'm using 1.4.7, and from your output I believe you're not > (the * in the query description I believe doesn't happen in those > situations any more). 1.4.4 and later eliminate redundant 0 scaling factors, but this one isn't actually redundant: > > Query(((Tmail AND 0 * XSUBJECTnot at 1)

Hello, we re-distribute R with our open-source platform http://www.ok-sat-library.org/ where we use R mainly for evaluation of computational experiments. Due to the various platforms, we build everything from source, and that works fine. Until now, that is: there are circumstances (for example in computer-science computer labs) where no Fortran-compiler is provided, and the users (students)

Hi, I don't want to have to downgrade my samba server to disable spoolss. I'm running 2.2.3. (I assume I don't need 2.2.3a since it just fixed an overwrite bug). When I use "disable spoolss = no", I can access my printer \\server\savin just fine. When I use "disable spoolss = yes", I can see my printer (savin) in \\server, but when I access it, I get:

Hi, I have a problem. I upgraded from samba 2.0.7 to 2.2.3 recently, and one of my 2 printers have driver issues. Whenever I print to SAVIN 2545, I get binary and hieroglyphics, so I assumed that it's driver-related. I can print to our HP8100 just fine. Some machines were still configured with: "\\server\savin", LAN Manager Printer These machines STILL print fine. However, if

Hi list, I've used sys & pxelinux now many times, it's really a useful toy. I found esp. syslinux very helpful as it allows to COMPLETELY boot from multiple disks. However, I could never use a 'vanilla' syslinux for that. I'm doomed to use Distributor patched versions, which I don't really like. Why is that? Read on: Well, I can't manage to boot of a 1.44 MB

The current llvm/llvm-gcc-4.2 2.6 branch passes all of the Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks built with its gfortran. The results compare as follows... Compile Command : gfortran -ffast-math -funroll-loops -msse3 -O3 %n.f90 -o %n benchmark gcc-4.2.4 llvm-gcc-svn llvm-gcc-2.6 llvm-gcc-2.6 at -m32 20081031 -m32 at -m32 at -m64 ac 18.30

Since the fact that gfortran performance has improved over the major releases, I decided to benchmark the current releases on a MacPro with the Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks using -ffast-math -funroll-loops -msse3 -O3. The results are... gcc release gcc 4.2.4 gcc 4.3.3 gcc 4.4-pre gcc 4.3.3/ gcc 4.4-pre/

I've just built R-devel (r60889) from source on my Mac OS X 10.6.8 using gcc from Xcode and gfortran from Simon. I didn't use all the recommended configuration flags only ./configure && make Still, I seem to pass "make check" and "make test-Segfault" in the tests directory with no problem, but the following leads to a persistent error + instant abort. 1)

Hello folks, I want to compile some fortran code to IR, but llvm-gfortran 4.2-2.9 does compile my fortran code. gfortran 4.2.1 fail with the same error. but gfortran 4.4.6 and ifort compiles fine. Attached is the file causing error. Error message is m_List.F90: In function 'exporttostring_': m_List.F90:925: error: conversion to non-scalar type requested I wonder if there any way I can

Hi, I have installed llvm and llvm-gfortran on Pentium4 machine using 32-bit Ubuntu, it works fine. I recently installed them on AMD64-Ubuntu 8.04, llvm-gfortran gave me following errors $ llvm-gfortran -Wall hello.f95 -o hellof /home/jli127/LLVM/llvm-gcc/install/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.2.1/../../../../lib64/libgfortran.a(error.o): In function `_gfortrani_gfc_itoa':

On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Yuanfang Chen <tabloid.adroit at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello folks, > I want to compile some fortran code to IR, but llvm-gfortran 4.2-2.9 does > compile my fortran code. gfortran 4.2.1 fail with the same error. but > gfortran 4.4.6 and ifort compiles fine. Attached is the file causing > error. Error message is > m_List.F90: In function

Dear Madam or Mister, My name is Manuel Montesino and I am a PhD student at the University of Copenhagen. I am not a programmer myself, but my thesis requires the combined use of R and a model. I would be very grateful if you help me with the following issue; I am trying to combine a small piece of code written in Fortran 77 with R. The F77 code aims to select data from a library and write it

I recently upgraded to Rtools28 to build a package under Windows. I see that g77 is no longer in Rtools, but it does have gfortran, and it uses version: GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.2.1-sjlj (mingw32-2) I am compiling some old fortran code as part of a larger project. When I do that, I get undefined references: gcc.exe: s_cmp.o: No such file or directory gcc.exe: s_copy.o: No such file or directory

I hope this is the place for this... I have to rebuild from scratch under Snow Leopard, and when I attempted to build R-2.9.1, I get the following results from ./ configure: checking how to get verbose linking output from fc... configure: WARNING: compilation failed checking for Fortran 77 libraries of fc... checking how to get verbose linking output from gcc -std=gnu99... -v checking for

The previously posted benchnarks for gcc vs llvm-gfortran had one mistake. I was actually had the gfortran for 4.3.1 installed instead of that from gcc 4.2.4. Below are the polyhedron benchmark results for all three compilers... gfortran 4.2.4 Benchmark Compile Executable Ave Run Number Estim Name (secs) (bytes) (secs) Repeats Err % --------- -------

Is the new EH scheme completely compatible with the existing linker in Xcode 4.1? I am finding that today's changes break the ability to link xplor-nih with dragonegg under FSF gcc 4.6.2... de-g++46 -c thread.cc -O3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -g -DX_MMAP_FLAGS=0 -DFORTRAN_INIT -fno-common -DDARWIN -D_REENTRANT -DNDEBUG -I/Users/howarth/xplor-nih-2.27/vmd/

2009/11/3 David Greene <dag at cray.com>: > Your best bet is to use llvm-gfortran.  I don't know what you mean by > "AST."  Do you really want an AST or something else (LLVM IR, something > higher-level, etc.)?  LLVM doesn't understand ASTs directly. Probably for high-level optimisations, or just to see if the parser is good, as I do in my compiler. But AST is

Hi David/Renato, By AST I mean Abstract Syntax Tree. We are writing an optimization pass for some FORTRAN95 + MPI code that requires us to analyze the AST. We thought of 2 ways of doing this: 1. Compile the code using Clang/llvm-gfortran, get the textual AST dump (somehow), analyze the AST dump using Ruby, modify it and then feed back the modified AST to LLVM. 2. Do the analysis as an LLVM

Dear R-devel, REvolution appear to be offering ParallelR only when bundled with their R Enterprise edition. As such it appears to be non-free and closed source. http://www.revolution-computing.com/products/parallel-r.php Since R is GPL and not LGPL, is this a breach of the GPL ? Below is the "GPL and ParallelR" thread from their R forum. mdowle > It appears that ParallelR