Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "let R and Rscript infer paths from their own location (PR#14007)"
2013 Apr 26
2
Transferring R to another computer, R_HOME_DIR
Hello,
I was looking at the R (installed on RHEL6) shell script and saw
R_HOME_DIR=/usr/lib64/R. Nowhere (and I could have got it wrong) does
it read in the environment value R_HOME_DIR. I have the need to rsync
the entire folder below /usr/lib64/R to another computer into another
directory location. Without changing the R shell script, how can i
force it read in R_HOME_DIR?
Or maybe i
2015 Feb 27
2
The Environment variables settings in bin/R, why do they ignore environment variables of the same name?
Hello,
In installation/R/bin/R i notice
1. R_HOME_DIR is hard coded e.g.
R_HOME_DIR=/usr/local/lib64/R
2. It ignores R_HOME_DIR
echo "WARNING: ignoring environment value of R_HOME"
3. R_SHARE_DIR, R_INCLUDE_DIR and R_DOC_DIR are also hard coded.
Is there a reason why these settings do not read the values from the
environment variables of the same name (assuming they exist) and
2006 Dec 07
2
help-links.sh not found by help.start() -- do I need to recompile?
Dear Rexperts,
after building R 2.4.0 from source in a temporary directory (*without*
installation), and subsequently moving the whole source/build tree to
another location, I have noticed that I had to change the variables
R_SHARE_DIR, R_INCLUDE_DIR, and R_DOC_DIR in the wrapper-script
/lib/R/bin/R as to reflect the current situation.
However, when I try to run the HTML help via
2011 Aug 19
1
Windows 7 issues with installing packages and setting library paths
Dear all,
I am forced to work in an environment without administrator rights.
When using R2.13.1 on Windows 7 (64-Bit), I found that I can?t install or update any packages due to missing writing permissions.
I managed to get full access to a directory on my C:\ drive now - but how do I specify that all libraries shall be installed into this directory?
In Rcmd_environ I have the following
2017 Apr 06
0
failure of make check-all
You may want to retry that after a make distclean, in case anything changed in the toolchain.
-pd
> On 6 Apr 2017, at 14:43 , Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. <therneau at mayo.edu> wrote:
>
> This run was done this AM on my linux box, and older 32 bit Dell optiplex (core 2 duo). The failure message is at the very end. (It's due to be replaced in a couple of weeks.) The sequence
2018 Dec 21
2
Bug report: R.home() cause package Rcpp failed executing sourceCpp, similar bug are labeled "BUG 16660" since 2016 and here I could provide a solution that tested in my laptop.
https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16660
Here is the bug, which R.home may generate a path contains a whitespace.
this will cause Rcpp failed executing sourceCpp
> sourceCpp("b:/2018-12-14/src/18020/MCMC.cpp")
Error in system(cmd, intern = !showOutput) : 'D:/Program' not found
Error in system(cmd, ignore.stderr = TRUE, intern = TRUE) :
2017 Apr 06
3
failure of make check-all
This run was done this AM on my linux box, and older 32 bit Dell optiplex (core 2 duo).
The failure message is at the very end. (It's due to be replaced in a couple of weeks.)
The sequence of steps was
svn up
tools/rsync-recommended
./configure
make
make check-all |& tee zzz
Terry T.
Result of ./config
R is now configured for i686-pc-linux-gnu
Source directory: .
2006 Feb 02
2
RHOME
R-help --
I built R-2.2.1 in my own directory on a sun (solaris). Now I would like
the sysadmin to move the contents to /usr/local/lib and place the binary
in /usr/local/bin. No problem. However, the RHOME variable defaults to
the directory from which R was built so it is not usable by anyone but me
or ROOT. I would like to avoid building this again if possible. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Dan
2015 Aug 31
0
Build R on Haiku
On 14/08/2015 15:19, Joe S wrote:
> Hi R-devel,
> I'm trying to get R 3.2.1 working on Haiku (an open source OS inspired by
> BeOS, not Linux based) on i586. With a few small changes to library paths
> and ifdefs I am able to get a seemingly working R binary. The build process
> stops with the 'tools' package. The last lines from make are below.
>
> Does anyone
2015 Aug 14
2
Build R on Haiku
Hi R-devel,
I'm trying to get R 3.2.1 working on Haiku (an open source OS inspired by
BeOS, not Linux based) on i586. With a few small changes to library paths
and ifdefs I am able to get a seemingly working R binary. The build process
stops with the 'tools' package. The last lines from make are below.
Does anyone have any tips? I'm rather new to debugging at this low level.
Are
2015 Oct 19
1
R 3.2.2 - make check and install package hang
Below is the output. Thanks for the help.
> Sys.getenv()
BASH_FUNC_module() () { eval
`/cm/local/apps/environment-modules/3.2.10/Modules/$MODULE_VERSION/bin/modulecmd
bash $*` }
COLUMNS 152
CPATH /cm/shared/apps/uge/8.2.1/include
CVS_RSH ssh
DISPLAY localhost:10.0
EDITOR
2016 Sep 22
1
R_DOC_DIR on EL6
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Tom Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 09/16/2016 10:28 AM, Jeroen Ooms wrote:
> > Where are the R docs located on EL6? It seems neither R.home("doc")
> > nor Sys.getenv("R_DOC_DIR") exists?
>
> /usr/share/doc/R-3.3.1
>
Can we set this in R_DOC_DIR accordingly so that it can be
programmatically
2024 Jan 10
1
Sys.which() caching path to `which`
Hello R-devel,
Currently on Unix-like systems, Sys.which incorporates the absolute
path to the `which` executable, obtained at the configure stage:
> ## hopefully configure found [/usr]/bin/which
> which <- "@WHICH@"
> if (!nzchar(which)) {
> warning("'which' was not found on this platform")
This poses a problem for the Spack package
2008 Apr 07
1
R_SHARE_DIR not defined for use in tests/Makefile running under Windows
The make variable $(R_SHARE_DIR) seems to be available for use in
tests/Makefile when running under Linux, but not Windows (R-2.6.2, R-2.6.1,
R-2.7.0 alpha 2008-04-06, under Windows XP 64 bit, built locally for 32 bit).
Is this intentional, or an oversight? Is it OK to use $(R_HOME)/share
instead (seems to work OK)?
I notice the following in /src/gnuwin32/front-ends/rcmdfn.c (from R-alpha
2010 Jun 09
2
Question on trying to build R 2.11.1 on Tru64(aka OSF1)
First I tried 'setenv R_SHELL /usr/local/bin/bash', as bash is the weapon
of choice for the faculty wishing to use R, then ran ./configure as before.
The ./configure output line
using as R_SHELL for scripts ... /usr/local/bin/bash
would seem to indicate that the R_SHELL environment variable was recognized
and acknowledged. However, I got the same build error:
gnumake[2]: Entering
2016 Sep 16
2
R_DOC_DIR on EL6
Where are the R docs located on EL6? It seems neither R.home("doc")
nor Sys.getenv("R_DOC_DIR") exists?
2019 Jan 23
0
So nearly there, but can't install rJava
Thanks Sebastian, Johannes and Dirk for your inputs, I think this can be marked [SOLVED] though I still don't understand how it started.
The answer seems to be that something sets an environment variable JAVA.LIBRARY.PATH and this wasn't set correctly. I had never directly done anything to set that so that's odd but what I had done that was causing the problem (I think) is that I had
2001 May 31
3
R-1.2.3: a small suggestion (PR#961)
[This is not a bug report, just a suggestion.]
With complex packages, it is often useful to maintain multiple
versions installed, for bug checking, and performance comparisons, and
for developers, for a development history (e.g., I have about 30
versions of ghostscript, whose development I contribute to, and I have
on several occasions run tests files on with each them to find out
when a change
2009 Jul 28
1
R --vannilla for install/remove/shlib(Re: R 2.8->2.9 change that breaks some upgrade scenarios)
This is the change I suggested earlier - it should just disable more of user/site customization during package installation/removal, and getting more of R 2.8-like behavior back. Attached and inlined below.
Against svn r48897 (svn HEAD AFAIK).
--------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/src/scripts/INSTALL b/src/scripts/INSTALL
index 42470c2...4c7bae9 100755
---
2006 Feb 20
2
R CMD config --cppflags buglet
As you may recall, a Debian user complained last year about how R is out of
line with respect to the filesystem standards (where, in essence,
architecture independent files should be in /usr/share, not /usr/lib). While
I more or less just told him to get lost, I think it was mostly BDR who
actually added support for this over the summer -- so a public Thanks!
first. As of a few weeks ago, I now