similar to: check stats fail | part III

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "check stats fail | part III"

2008 Jun 13
2
compiling 2.7.0 GNU/Linux | BLAS & Lapack query
Greetings - For a host of reasons I chose (was forced) to upgrade my multi-Opteron box from Fedora 7 -> Fedora 8. In the process, I also updated the ACML I had installed from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0. While I get no errors (that I can find) in the config -> make -> make install sequence, I'm pretty sure (based on some benchmarks) that I'm not getting BLAS and/or Lapack to compile in. So,
2009 Jun 26
1
problems compiling for RHEL 5.3 x86_64
Well, CentOS 5.3, which amounts to the same thing. I recently decided to upgrade my main research machine from Fedora Core 8 -> CentOS 5.3. Basically, I was looking to move to a distro with longer 'term-of-life' than the release schedule for Fedora currently allows. The machine is a multi-Opteron box, so both 32- and 64-bit apps natively supported. Since I do a lot of 'linear
2006 Jul 22
1
compile R with ACML support | RHEL 4
Greetings - I'm trying to compile R under GNU/Linux (RHEL 4) on a multi-Opteron box, with ACML support. First, I downloaded and installed ACML 3.5 - GNU version, although I'm not entirely sure what the differences are - from the AMD website. The ACML libraries were installed to /opt/acml3.5.0/ Second, I ran ./configure --with-blas='-lacml' The configure went fine,
2006 Jul 23
1
compiling R | multi-Opteron | BLAS source
Greetings - A quick perusal of some of the posts to this maillist suggest the level of the questions is probably beyond someone working at my level, but at the risk of looking foolish publicly (something I find I get increasingly comfortable with as I get older), here goes: My research group recently purchased a multi-Opteron system (bunch of 880 chips), running 64-bit RHEL 4 (which we have
2009 Jun 26
1
can't use ATLAS or ACML | 2.9.0
So, tried again from scratch. Again, CentOS 5.3, which is essentially RHEL 5.3. ./configure --with-blas="-L/opt/acml4.3.0/gfortran64/lib -lacml" In config.log, get things like configure:37199: checking for dgemm_ in -L/opt/acml4.3.0/gfortran64/lib -lacml configure:37230: gcc -std=gnu99 -o conftest -g -O2 -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib64 conftest.c
2009 Nov 20
1
make fails on R r50499 ( openSuSE 11.0 x86-64)
Dear all, I encountered a problem when compiling the source of R patched 2.10.0 r50499 (19-11-2009) linked to ACML single threaded (4.2.0 or 4.3.0) OS: openSuSE 11.0 x86-64 make fails when it comes to installing mgcv with the following [snip] ** R ** inst ** preparing package for lazy loading Error in loadNamespace(i[[1L]], c(lib.loc, .libPaths())) : non esiste un pacchetto chiamato
2006 Oct 16
3
x86_64, acml-3.5.0-gfortran64 and lme4
I am encountering segfaults when checking the lme4 package on an Athlon64 system if I use the acml blas. R was built as a 64-bit application using the GCC 4.0.3 compiler suite including gfortran. The version of acml is 3.5.0 gfortran64. I do not encounter the segfaults when I compile R with R's built-in BLAS. The errors occur in the first example in lme4 in a call to lmer. It looks like
2010 Aug 24
1
Trouble configuring R to use ACML
I am trying to get R to use the ACML BLAS, specifically the 'mp' version for multithreading. I have installed acml-4-4-0-gfortran-64bit I added /opt/acml4.4.0/gfortran64_mp/lib to $LD_LIBRARY_PATH. I ran: sudo ./configure --with-blas="-L/opt/acml4.4.0/gfortran64_mp/lib -lacml_mp" At the end of the configuration, the only external library listed is readline, and at the end
2005 Dec 14
1
Building R-devel with ACML
I'm trying to build R-devel with AMD's ACML. I downloaded version 3.0.0 64bit for gfortran (acml-3-0-0-gfortran-64bit.tgz) and copied the libraries to /usr/local/lib. When I configure R to build against the ACML library, how do I know if the library has been detected and will be used? I run 'configure' with the '--with-blas=-lacml' flag and am using gcc 4.0.2 (with
2006 Jul 24
1
R and ACML
While I recently received some very helpful files and email from Kevin Hendricks for compiling with ATLAS, thought I'd first have a stab at ACML. Having problems, which I suspect are trivial to solve: 1. machine is running RHEL 4, meaning, it uses gcc 3.4.5 out of the box, and g77. In my experience, over-riding RHEL's choice, and manually upgrading to gcc 4.x.x (and, as a consequence
2014 Feb 25
1
acml blas+lapac in R
dear experts I'd like to ask you, probably on behalf all of us who try to use AMD's ACML for performance optimisation a question. There seem to be problem when these two, R and ACML are coupled, described here: http://devgurus.amd.com/message/1255852#1255852 I'd like to ask, while not being a programmer/developer, how incorrect and dangerous this might be? maybe such a setup must
2015 Sep 04
3
AD order of installation
I don't see the following at https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_a_Samba_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller There is an 'order' of installation for an AD. Some things must come before others, some things can come when you may. Here is my take based on what I have learned over the past weeks: OS installation (listed for completeness, even though this is a 'dah' item).
2015 Sep 04
1
AD order of installation
On 09/04/2015 11:47 AM, Mark Foley wrote: > Unless you are specifying by IP, NTP isn't going to resolve with e.g. > 0.pool.ntp.org if you don't have DNS running. Personal Experience. Good point. As I run on an armv7 with no battery rtc, I have to get time sync going before doing practically anything. It much depends on how your system resolves before local DNS is running.
2010 Aug 25
1
Trying to configure R to use acml_mp
Hi, I'm following up to a post I made to r-help here: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Trouble-configuring-R-to-use-ACML-tt2337193.html#a2337193 I have verified that LD_LIBRARY_PATH is set... I set it in /etc/bash.bashrc (is that ok?) and it shows up when I echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH I also tried adding the paths to the ld.so cache as Prof Ripley had suggested. I get the same results when running
2007 Aug 24
2
config error during 2.5.1 compile
Have been running 2.5.1 on my multi-pro Opteron box running Fedora Core 5 with no problems. Had compiled previously with no problems. However, for a variety of reasons (mostly due to ACML upgrade), I tried a recompile using the following sequence of commands (note I'm compiling in ACML support for blas): LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/acml3.6.1/gfortran64/lib export LD_LIBRARY_PATH ./configure
2005 Sep 06
1
Build R with AMD pgi compiled ACML library
Hi, Has anyone had any luck in using portland group compiler to build R(-devel) with AMD's pgi compiled ACML library? I've downloaded the packages and set LD_LIBRARY_PATH, and run configuration script as follow: % ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/R.pgcc --with-blas='-lacml' However, it failed to pick up double complex BLAS, checking for sgemm_ in -lacml... yes checking
2009 Jun 11
3
deSolve question
Dear All, I like to simulate a physiologically based pharmacokinetics model using R but am having a problem with the daspk routine. The same problem has been implemented in Berkeley madonna and Winbugs so that I know that it is working. However, with daspk it is not, and the numbers are everywhere! Please see the following and let me know if I am missing something... Thanks a lot in advance,
2006 Sep 28
1
unable to load lapack.so
Hi, I'm having problems using ACML with R. I made two changes in config.site by setting LDFLAGS="-L/opt/acml3.1.0/gnu64/lib" BLAS_LIBS="-lacml" ./config and make go through but when I try to use the lm() function, I get the error message Error in chol2inv(Qr$qr[p1, p1, drop = FALSE]) : lapack routines cannot be loaded In addition: Warning message: unable to load
2018 Jan 04
2
Fixed BLAS tests for external BLAS library
Hi Tomas, Thanks for your reply. I find your response curious, however. Surely the identical() test is simply incorrect when catering for possibly different BLAS implementations? Or is it the case that conformant BLAS implementations all produce bit-identical results, which seems unlikely? (Sorry, I am unfamiliar with the BLAS spec.) Although whatever the answer to this theoretical question,
2009 Jun 25
0
more on make check states failure
Ran make check-devel and make check-all (for more comprehensive testing) - same error messages - not even sure where to look in tests or Examples for 'help' - no logs, or files with .fail extension or anything I might *guess* to look for. I've never had this problem before - the only thing different on the box from when I had 2.9.0 running fine is 1. change from Fedora Core 8