similar to: Possible bug in summary.survfit - 'scale' argument ignored?

Dear Dr.Goslee and anyone may intrested in matrix manipulate, I am using your ecodist to do mantel and partial mantel test, I have locality data and shape variation data, and the two distance matrixs are given as belowings. When I run the analysis, it is always report that the matrix is not square, but I didn't know what's wrong with my data. Would you please help me on this. I am quite

Hi, In my analysis of impacts of insecticide-treated bednets on malaria, I look at the relationship between malaria incidence and mosquito behaviors. The condensed data set is copied here. Ordinary regression (lm) shows that Incidence was negatively related to Mortality. This makes sense because the latter reflected the strength of killing mosquitoes by insecticide-treated nets. Since the

Dear list, I have the following matrix. How can I make the following plot? 1. The x-axis has index 1:7, and the first column is plotted against index 1, second against 2, and so on. 2. I want the points from the left upper conner including the antidiagonal to be plotted with col=2, and the rest with col=3 [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [,7] [1,] 0.589 0.857 0.923 0.944 0.954 0.963

[code]>require("survival") > coxph(Surv(futime,fustat)~age + strata(rx),ovarian) Call: coxph(formula = Surv(futime, fustat) ~ age + strata(rx), data = ovarian) coef exp(coef) se(coef) z p age 0.137 1.15 0.0474 2.9 0.0038 Likelihood ratio test=12.7 on 1 df, p=0.000368 n= 26, number of events= 12 > coxph(Surv(futime,fustat)~age, ovarian, subset=rx==1)

Hi John, Brilliant solution and the best sort - when you finally solve your problem by yourself. Jim On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 2:52 AM array chip <arrayprofile at yahoo.com> wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > I found out why clip() does not work with lines(survfit.object)! > > If you look at code of function survival:::lines.survfit, in th middle of the code: > > do.clip <-

Hola Estoy tratando de correr un survival analysis usando un Cox regression model. Tengo una duda respecto a la organizacion del script. Tengo una variable que es -tamano del individuo- y quiero ver si hay diferencia en sobrevivencia respecto a tamano. Como diseno de campo los tamanos fueron ubicados de forma aleatoria en bloques al azar. Cuado planteo el script tengo algo como:

Hi, Is it normal to get intercept in the list of covariates in the output of survreg function with standard error, z, p.value etc? Does it mean that intercept was fitted with the covariates? Does Value column represent coefficients or some thing else? Regards, ------------------------------------------------- tmp = survreg(Surv(futime, fustat) ~ ecog.ps + rx, ovarian,

Hello, I am having some trouble with the 'censoring-adjusted C-index' by Uno et al, in the package survAUC. The relevant function is UnoC. The question has to do with what happens when I specify a time point t for the upper limit of the time range under consideration (we want to avoid using the right-end tail of the KM curve). Copying from the example in the help file: TR <-

Dear all, I am using R 3.4.3 on Windows 10. I am preparing some teaching materials and I'm having trouble matching the by-hand version with the R code. I have fitted a Cox model - let's use the ovarian data as an example: library(survival) data(ovarian) ova_mod <- coxph(Surv(futime,fustat)~age+rx,data=ovarian) If I want to make predict survival for a new set of individuals at 100

Dear All: I have some questions about the output of coxph. Below is the input and output: ---------------------------------------- > coxph(formula = Surv(futime, fustat) ~ age + rx + ecog.ps, data = + ovarian, x = TRUE) Call: coxph(formula = Surv(futime, fustat) ~ age + rx + ecog.ps, data = ovarian, x = TRUE) coef exp(coef) se(coef) z p age 0.147 1.158

Dear R users, I am trying to use "muhaz" and "plot.muhaz" functions in "muhaz" package to estimate and plot hazard funciton. However function "muhaz" always gives error message "Error in Surv(times, delta) : object "times" not found". I could not even run their sample codes in the user's manual as follows: data(ovarian)

Hi I am trying to understand how to get the validate() function in Design to work with the subset option. I tried this: ovarian.cph=cph(Surv(futime, fustat) ~ age+factor(ecog.ps)+strat(rx), time.inc=1000, x=T, y=T, data=ovarian) validate(ovarian.cph) #fine when no subset is used, but the following two don't work: > validate(ovarian.cph, subset=ovarian$ecog.ps==2) Error in

How can I get the Log - Rank p value to be output? The chi square value can be output, so I was thinking if I can also have the degrees of freedom output I could generate the p value, but can't see how to find df either. > (survtest <- survdiff(Surv(time, cens) ~ group, data = surv,rho=0)) Call: survdiff(formula = Surv(time, cens) ~ group, data = surv, rho = 0) N Observed

Dear UseR, I do not know if this a problem with me, my data or cph/survest in package design. The example below works with a standard data set, but not with my data, but I cannot locate the problem. Note that I am using an older package of survival to avoid a problem with the newly renamed function in survival meeting Design. Dieter # First, check standard example to make sure library(Design)

Hello, I have questions regarding penalized Cox regression using survival package (functions coxph() and ridge()). I am using R 2.8.0 on Ubuntu Linux and survival package version 2.35-4. Question 1. Consider the following example from help(ridge): > fit1 <- coxph(Surv(futime, fustat) ~ rx + ridge(age, ecog.ps, theta=1), ovarian) As I understand, this builds a model in which `rx' is

Dear all, I am doing library(survival) fit <- coxph(Surv(futime,fustat) ~ rx, ovarian) plot(survfit(fit,newdata=ovarian),col=c(1,2)) legend("bottomleft", legend=c("rx = 0", "rx = 1"), lty=c(1,2),col=c(1,2)) Is this correct to compare these two groups? Is the 0.31 the p-value that the median f two groups are equal Why lty does not work here? Many thanks

Hi, I'm using natural cubic splines from splines::ns() in survival regression (regressing inter-arrival times of patients to a queue on queue size). The queue size fluctuates between 3600 and 3900. I would like to be able to run predict.survreg() for sizes <3600 and >3900 by assuming that the rate for <3600 is the same as for 3600 and that for >4000 it's the same as for

Dear all, I am confused with the output of survfit.coxph. Someone said that the survival given by summary(survfit.coxph) is the baseline survival S_0, but some said that is the survival S=S_0^exp{beta*x}. Which one is correct? By the way, if I use "newdata=" in the survfit, does that mean the survival is estimated by the value of covariates in the new data frame? Thank you very much!

It seems to me that R returns the unpenalized log-likelihood for the ratio likelihood test when ridge regression Cox proportional model is implemented. Is this as expected? In the example below, if I am not mistaken, fit$loglik[2] is unpenalized log-likelihood for the final estimates of coefficients. I would expect to get the penalized log-likelihood. I would like to check if this is as expected.

It seems to me that summary for ridge coxph() prints summary but returns NULL. It is not a big issue because one can calculate statistics directly from a coxph.object. However, for some reason the score test is not calculated for ridge coxph(), i.e score nor rscore components are not included in the coxph object when ridge is specified. Please find the code below. I use 2.9.2 R with 2.35-4 version