similar to: unlink fails to remove symbolic links

If we get any error while doing a dir index/item lookup in the log tree, we were always unlinking the corresponding inode in the subvolume. It makes sense to unlink only if the lookup failed to find the dir index/item, which corresponds to NULL or -ENOENT, and not when other errors happen (like a transient -ENOMEM or -EIO). Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> ---

Im try user unlink with VFS in samba 3.0.28a, VFS it provide for my FS. but if I make delete file in WinXP, file removed from folder, but after update (F5) file show again.... logs: level 10 get that delete message was from XP, but VFS did not call unlink procedure... after that on any other operation(such as F5) I get error Access Denied (errnum 5) What is it?

I fixed a problem where we weren''t reserving space for an orphan item when we had to fallback to using the global reserve for an unlink, but I introduced another problem. I was migrating the bytes from the transaction reserve to the global reserve and then releasing from the global reserve in btrfs_end_transaction(). The problem with this is that a migrate will jack up the size for the

I was hoping that someone could try to reproduce an error that I am getting. The R Site Search keeps timing out on me, so apologies of this has already come up. I'm using > R.version _ platform i386-pc-mingw32 arch i386 os mingw32 system i386, mingw32

Hi Ben, Yes, I was referring to the same link before and I think most of the FOPS I've understood from the definitions there and I'll update if I found any corrections or new definitions. Btw, my previous underatanding about LOOKUP is wrong, its NOT dns lookup. Regards, Jeevan. On Nov 14, 2017 11:02 AM, "Ben Turner" <bturner at redhat.com> wrote: Here is some of the

Hi, Occasionally I get an error message in my dovecot log when, in evolution, I click on the inbox: dovecot: Apr 21 00:07:06 Error: imap(admin): unlink(/home/admin/.maildir/cur/1145393825.P23027Q0M159929.terminator.odyssey.nl:2,ST) failed: Is a directory Instead of the message being delivered as a file it appears to be written as a directory. Deleting those directories solves the error message

With samba-2.2.5, cups-1.1.14, and printcap=cups, I find that I have to explicitly clean up old print data files in /var/spool/samba with a cron job. With a traditional LPR, we use -r to tell lpr to remove the file for us after the file is spooled. With cups, we send it over ipp, and I think we should then unlink the data file ourselves. Does this seem right? --- print_cups.c~ Thu May

Hello list On my server almost half of files are duplicated, and there are almost 100GB of data which is growing fast. I'm using weekly script to find duplicated files and replace them with hardlinks. Everything is fine as long as users aren't trying to edit and save some documents which have hardlinks. With samba 3.3 it seems that hardlinks aren't unlinked before file is saved.

> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 03:12:53PM +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote: > > Since "foo" has no write permission under /var/www, he cannot rsync > > from remote server to the local filesystem because rsync will try to > > make temp file and unlink the original file before writing over it. Is > > there any solution to this problem? > > See the -T (--temp-dir)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11523 Bug ID: 11523 Summary: Request: Add option to unlink hard links when permissions change Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee:

Folks, bugs at stupidkitties.com wrote: " I was wondering if it'd be feasible to add an option (or multiple options, depending on the desired granularity) to cause rsync to treat changes in file attributes the same way it treats changes to the file's contents when it encounters hard links at the destination. Maybe something like --relink-p or something?" One of colleagues has

On Wed, 20 Dec 2000 joehl@web.de wrote: > > # creating a file > > cat("sddfasdf", file="tempfile") > > showConnections() > class description mode text isopen can read can write > > con <- file("tempfile", "r") > > readLines(con) > [1] "sddfasdf" > Warning message: > incomplete final line in:

> # creating a file > cat("sddfasdf", file="tempfile") > showConnections() class description mode text isopen can read can write > con <- file("tempfile", "r") > readLines(con) [1] "sddfasdf" Warning message: incomplete final line in: readLines(con, n, ok) > showConnections() class description mode text isopen

It seems unlink doesn't work with wildcards in 2.5.0. I've tried R-2.5.0 under gnu/linux from source and the Mac binary from att research. Example: > dir() [1] "bgx.Rnw" "bgx.pdf" "run.1" > unlink("run.*",recursive=T) > dir() [1] "bgx.Rnw" "bgx.pdf" "run.1" > unlink("run.1",recursive=T)

A while ago someone on IRC had a directory with no entries but with a non-zero i_size. rmdir fails because i_size isn''t zero but there are no items left to remove and decrease i_size. At the time casual code inspection implied that this would be possible in unlucky error cases. I finally got around to really reading up and reproducing it. diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c

We don't need the vhost_scsi_mutex in vhost_scsi_port_link and vhost_scsi_port_unlink because LIO has a refcount on the se_tpg for us, so it can't be removed while these functions are called. This removes the vhost_scsi_mutex from those functions to avoid cases where we are adding or removing LUNs to vhost-deviceA but are stuck waiting on the vhost_scsi_mutex because we are running

Filtering the brick logs in TRACE mode with rpcsvc.c does show the FOPS. >From this, I've realized that LOOKUP is actually dns lookup. This actually differs from NFS lookup operation. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Regards, Jeevan. On Nov 13, 2017 9:40 PM, "Jeevan Patnaik" <g1patnaik at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Can I get a brief description of all the

Hi all! It seems the current ext3 code has some problems; my machine is running 2.4.6-ac1 with ext3-0.9 patches on top of it. This afternoon, I was doing some testing of a little piece of code on my machine, and I was able to crash it. What this program does is, in effect something like (pseudo-code) for(i=0; i<100; i++) { fd=creat file-i truncate fd, 50M mmap fd close fd fill the

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5190 Summary: rsyncd can't unlink dir structure when only the group has write permission Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

There was a patch merged in on 9/29 that changed remove() calls to unlink(): - (djm) Merged big SCO portability patch from Tim Rice <tim at multitalents.net> Does SCO's libc not include remove()? Note that sftp-server.c is currently using remove. The reason I ask is I'd like to keep the portable tree as close to openbsd as possible, and if we need remove() for SCO we should