Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "'anova.gls' in 'nlme' (PR#13567)"
2002 Jan 12
1
Question about mixed-effects models example (Pinheiro and Bates)
Hi all,
I'm trying to figure out the example about mixed models in the Pinheiro
and Bates book (Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-Plus, 2000, pp. 135-137).
One thing I don't understand is:
When I run the command
fm1Orth.lm <- lm( distance ~ age, Orthodont )
followed by
fm2Orth.lm <- update( fm1Orth.lm, formula = distance ~ Sex*age )
and then do
summary(fm2Orth.lm)
2009 May 05
0
stepAICc function (based on MASS:::stepAIC.default)
Dear all,
I have tried to modify the code of MASS:::stepAIC.default(), dropterm() and addterm() to use AICc instead of AIC for model selection.
The code is appended below. Somehow the calculations are still not correct and I would be grateful if anyone could have a look at what might be wrong
with this code...
Here is a working example:
##
require(nlme)
model1=lme(distance ~ age + Sex, data =
2020 Oct 08
2
[External] Re: unable to access index for repository...
I wonder if you are perhaps trying to solve the wrong problem.
If you like what the older version of the aod package does, but not
the current version,
then I think the solution is to propose an option to the aod
maintainer that would restore your
preferred algorithm into the current version, and then use the current R.
A less good, but possibly workable, option is to compile the old
version of
2020 Oct 08
0
unable to access index for repository...
Don't choose a mirror. That will override the repos choice.
Do update R to a current version if you aren't able to debug this
yourself.
Duncan Murdoch
On 08/10/2020 12:38 p.m., Steven Yen wrote:
> Sorry Gentlemen and all. Now this is becoming a joke (to me). I repeated
> what I did earlier, with and without the option to set repos suggested
> by Duncan. Now it does not work.
2020 Oct 08
0
unable to access index for repository...
All support on this list is voluntary, and support for old versions of R is not even necessarily on-topic here which is why you keep getting nudged to upgrade. Your "need" for support for an old version is definitely not "our" problem, so I suggest you start looking for a consultant if this issue is that important to you. Such is the nature of volunteer-developed open source
2020 Oct 08
0
unable to access index for repository...
Okay, so it's not an RStudio issue. However, I'd guess setting
options(repos = "https://cran-archive.r-project.org")
at the start of your session could make everything work. (I'm guessing
you currently have it set to "http://cran.rstudio.com", which is the
source of the last warning below, probably due to an R bug. But since
you're using an obsolete
2007 Feb 19
0
problem in reading TOMS observed ASCII data file
Hello R Users,
I have two data sets i) TOMS aerosol optical depth(AOD) and ii) TOMS
ozone(O3).
AOD data is on 1x1 grid and O3 data is on 5x5 grid.
First I want to read AOD and O3 as it is and then I want to regrid AOD on
5x5 grid as O3.
Reading is first problem.
FIRST PROBLEM READING AOD:
AOD data is in following format:
#########
Latitute: 89.5
167 0 0 0 0 0 182 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200
2020 Oct 08
2
unable to access index for repository...
Sorry Gentlemen and all. Now this is becoming a joke (to me). I repeated
what I did earlier, with and without the option to set repos suggested
by Duncan. Now it does not work. I wonder whether it is dependent on the
mirror I chose, but I do not remember the one I chose earlier when it work.
I need your help, gentlemen, as I need to use R-3.0.3 for my task.
>
2007 Feb 19
1
need help in reading TOMS observed ASCII data file
Hello R Users,
I am new to R.
I have two data sets i) TOMS aerosol optical depth(AOD) and ii) TOMS
ozone(O3).
>
> AOD data is on 1x1 grid and O3 data is on 5x5 grid.
>
> First I want to read AOD and O3 as it is and then I want to regrid AOD on
> 5x5 grid as O3.
>
> Reading is first problem.
>
> FIRST PROBLEM READING AOD:
>
> AOD data is in following format:
>
2020 Oct 08
2
unable to access index for repository...
Thanks. You gentlemen please tell me what this means. In R (outside of
RStudio) I ran:
install.packages("aod")
Received a warning (and installation did not seem to go through).
Then I tried
install.packages("aod",repos='https://cran-archive.r-project.org')
Received a warning but it went on to try
2020 Oct 08
2
unable to access index for repository...
Thanks for the help. I have a reason to continue with R-3.0.3. I used
maxLik to estimate econometric models and some of them are better
handled with R-3.0.3 (but not later)----a sad reality I do not like.
Here is what I did. I downloaded
https://cran-archive.r-project.org/bin/windows/contrib/3.0/aod_1.3.zip
and installed the zip file, which worked in both RStudio and R (without
RStudio).
In
2020 Oct 08
0
unable to access index for repository...
Drop the RStudio repos.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 05.10.2020 11:10, Steven Yen wrote:
> Thanks. I did as suggested but still received a warning, though the
> installation went through. Anything I could do to install without the
> warning message.
>
> What is the contrib.url argument?
>
> > install.packages("aod",repos='https://cran-archive.r-project.org')
2020 Oct 05
0
unable to access index for repository...
Then you'd rather need
install.packages("aod",repos='https://cran-archive.r-project.org')
or use the contrib.url argument.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 05.10.2020 10:47, Steven Yen wrote:
> Thanks for the help. I do update to the latest R-4.0.2. As I said, for
> reasons that's hard to explain, some of my tasks are better handled with
> an older version of R, in
2020 Oct 08
0
unable to access index for repository...
Just remembered: RStudio runs its own wrapper around
install.packages(). Steven, you should try doing the install from
outside of RStudio, and see if it makes a difference.
Duncan Murdoch
On 08/10/2020 9:59 a.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> He didn't specify the RStudio repos, though it's probably implicitly
> specified in getOption("repos"). I wonder why
2020 Oct 05
2
unable to access index for repository...
Thanks. I did as suggested but still received a warning, though the
installation went through. Anything I could do to install without the
warning message.
What is the contrib.url argument?
> install.packages("aod",repos='https://cran-archive.r-project.org')
Warning in install.packages :
? unable to access index for repository
2020 Oct 08
2
unable to access index for repository...
He didn't specify the RStudio repos, though it's probably implicitly
specified in getOption("repos"). I wonder why install.packages() is
looking there, when repos is given explicitly?
On 08/10/2020 8:54 a.m., Uwe Ligges wrote:
> Drop the RStudio repos.
>
> Best,
> Uwe Ligges
>
> On 05.10.2020 11:10, Steven Yen wrote:
>> Thanks. I did as suggested but
2020 Oct 05
2
unable to access index for repository...
Thanks for the help. I do update to the latest R-4.0.2. As I said, for
reasons that's hard to explain, some of my tasks are better handled with
an older version of R, in this case R-3.0.3. Please just help me install
packages successfully with this older version of R.
I ran the following line but obviously was not getting it across.
=====
>
2020 Oct 05
0
unable to access index for repository...
From
../ReadMe
in the mentioned web resource:
"Packages for R >= 1.7.0 and R < 3.2.0 are available from
https://cran-archive.r-project.org/bin/windows/contrib/"
We do not hold binaries of several year old versions of R on CRAN.
Note that R 3.0.0 is 7 years old. You shoudl realy consider to update to
4.0.2.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 05.10.2020 09:56, Steven Yen wrote:
> I had
2020 Oct 05
2
unable to access index for repository...
I had to install/use an older version of (R-3.0.3) for a reason. While
installing a package from CRAN (either in RStudio or R), I received the
following warning message saying unable to access index for repository
http://cran.rstudio.com/bin/windows/contrib/3.0. See message below. In
this case, I tried to install "aod". The install nevertheless went
through, as confirmed by the
2020 Oct 08
0
[External] Re: unable to access index for repository...
Hmm. You raised an interesting point. Actually I am not having problems with aod per se?-it is just a supporting package I need while using old R. The essential package I need, maxLik, simply works better under R-3.0.3, for reason I do not understand?specifically the numerical gradients of the likelihood function are not evaluated as accurately in newer versions of R in my experience, which is why