similar to: Roadmap ?

Hi all, I am using ggplot2 and continuing to find it very useful and pretty. However, I am trying to create some graphics for publication that would be included in an MS Word document (not my choice!) in Windows Vista. The problem is that I want to use stat_smooth() to add an fitted linear model line along with its 95% confidence band, but I cannot seem to get the confidence band in a format

I would like to get the name of the user form the system. Is it possible ? Something like >system.user() returning something like [1] "etber12" Thanks, Etienne [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, With two data sets, one complete and another one partial, I would like to merge them and keep the unmatched lines. The problem is that merge() dosen't keep the unmatched lines. Is there another function that I could use to merge the data frames. Example: completedf <- expand.grid(alpha=letters[1:3],beta=1:3) partdf <- data.frame( alpha= c('a','a','c'),

Un texte encapsul? et encod? dans un jeu de caract?res inconnu a ?t? nettoy?... Nom : non disponible URL : <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20080804/8b871b75/attachment.pl>

I try to use ColorRamp as ColorRampPalette (i.e. with the same gradient), but it seems there is a nuance that I've missed. pal.crp<-colorRampPalette( c("blue", "white", "red"), space = "rgb") plot(rep(0,40),pch=16,col=pal.crp(40)) # is great But, using the same gradient with colorRamp is giving erratic colors. pal.cr<-colorRamp(

Un texte encapsul? et encod? dans un jeu de caract?res inconnu a ?t? nettoy?... Nom : non disponible URL : <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20111212/239c1cbe/attachment.pl>

Hi Timo, congrats to the merger with OX. Currently the implementation of RFC 5257, ANNOTATE-EXPERIMENT-1, has only low priority on http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Roadmap I want to explain a scenario that would benefit from annotation support to - maybe - increase the priority in your roadmap: I'm currently working on a project to publish bank customer related documents inside a banking

Hi there, I'm very interested in oVirt as a management interface for a VM setup we're building, however it seems as though there isn't much info on the product roadmap or active development. I'm wondering if anyone could point me to more information on the roadmap or commit activity on the project? Regards, Anthony -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Hi all... I'm looking once again at the Syslinux roadmap. It seems to me that we're going to have a very hard time making Syslinux 4.00 be the full-featured everything-in-C release I had hoped for, or perhaps more specifically, that it is justifiable to sit on the current filesystems-in-C code waiting for the rest. That would probably mean productizing the transitional COM32R module

On Sun, 2018-05-06 at 22:14 +0200, Davy Defaud via samba wrote: > > So, what’s the current status now? I can see RODC and SUBDOMAIN on the > roadmap. > But, as there are not “FUNDED”, is there someone actually working on it? > If so, are they targeted for a particular version or just “when it’s ready”? RODC support has been funded as is pretty good as of 4.8. There are still some

http://dovecot.org/roadmap.html I'll try to keep it updated. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20071230/4cfeacec/attachment-0002.bin>

Hi; I need the xen development roadmap. Where can I find it? Best Regards, Ergin Ozekes -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20140121/95c040eb/attachment.html>

Hey Timo, I was curious where Single Instance Storage fits in on the roadmap, now that you are maybe settled in in your new digs... Is it still coming soon? Has it been pushed back by your new employers priorities? Its real high on mine, so if has been back-burnered, I'll need to start looking for alternatives... Thanks, -- Best regards, Charles

I''ve been looking around for a "roadmap", something that shows planned releases of RoR. I''m working with RC2, and I''m curious what and when there will be new releases. Thanks, Joe --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to

As promised, in preparation for next week's SIG meeting, here's a kick-off discussion about the Virtualization SIG roadmap. I'm mainly tossing out ideas here -- see this is an invitation to discussion. Key things I think should be on the roadmap: * Release process - General cadence - Estimate of the next release (if any) * Specification of targets - Right now, mainly xen4centos

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Valery Khamenya wrote: > where could one find any LLVM development roadmap for this > and perhaps next year? We generally have not published a road map like this because it is very difficult to do it in a meaningful way. Because LLVM is largely driven by volenteers and because noone working on it guarantees that they will finish a project that they start, we

Hi all, I'm new to this list so I don't know if this topic was recently discussed. Here in Rome with other friends of mine we extensively used tinc-vpn as backend layer of our network, now we need a clever key management of the keys to meet our goals. Now ZioProto (that Guus meet at FOSDEM) says to me that something is going to be developed in this area, so I like to know what kind of

Hi, where could one find any LLVM development roadmap for this and perhaps next year? Especially would be interesting to know about * planned features for PS3 Cell processor -- as well as for Wii, Xbox360 CPUs * multithreading in general * possibly coming changes in major versioning and related issues * other interesting featuring comments on current status to above listed items are also

Dear Group, At http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/tmp/summary.pdf I have put a draft of a roadmap for choosing a method for analyzing serial (longitudinal) data. If anyone has feedback about this, including adding criteria for judging methods that I may have missed, I would appreciate hearing from you. Thanks Frank -- Frank E Harrell Jr Professor and Chair School of Medicine

Hi Valery, On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 13:15 +0200, Valery Khamenya wrote: > Hi, > > where could one find any LLVM development roadmap for this > and perhaps next year? About the best "roadmap" we have is the list of enhancements in Bugzilla: