similar to: Installing latest version under Windows (PR#10908)

Hi all, I have a dataset consisting of 5 columns and over 5000 rows. Each row gives information about an individual animal, including longevity, i.e. at what age an animal died. For the model I use I need to create n rows for each animal, n being its longevity, and a new column 'survival' with a binary 0/1 outcome. When an animal died e.g. at age 5, there have to be 5 rows of identical

Dear Gurus, We're having bizarre problems/behaviour. Admittedly we have an unusual set-up: - users on linux desktops (RedHat/KDE) mounting files over SMB using samba-2.2.5-10 -client and -common rpms. - files are on a SAN, clustered behind 2 netware servers (6.5), wihch run the cifs.nlm (netware guy has gone home - can't tell you the version just now) Files are spontaneously

Jingling, I faced the same issue in using LLVM for an introductory compiler course this semester. The way I am (optimistically) addressing it is that I have given the students a tarball of LLVM containing most of LLVM but very few optimizations. In particular, we've only given them a few essential transformations that the front-end or lli need, and any transformations used by those

Hi Chris, Thanks for the quick input. The harder the LLVM is, the harder it is for me to teach the course:-) Too many optimisations have been added, meaning I have to design many new projects. --- Jingling On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 09:41:13PM -0600, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Jingling Xue wrote: > > > I understand that LLVM is now available in the public domain. >

I have a large data frame, 77 rows, with 10 columns. Each row represents a unique individual with 10 characteristics, some of which are categorical factors and some continuous numeric variables. Each of the ten variables is important (the 10 columns obviously correspond to the individuals of interest). Importantly, this data set represents a population (not sample) of people with a certain medical

Hi Chris, I understand that LLVM is now available in the public domain. I assume many more optimisations have been added to the system. I need to decide which compiler system I will use for my advanced compiler course this year. Many students enjoyed working with your llvm last year. Thanks for the input. ---Jingling On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 09:20:01PM -0600, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mon,

On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > Hi, > > Attempting to use cvs with LLVM is producing the following: > > bash-2.05b$ cvs status > cvs [status aborted]: connect to > llvm-cvs.cs.uiuc.edu(128.174.245.58):2401 failed: Connection refused > > I think this has happened before and the root cause was a stuck xinetd > process on the cvs server. I kicked it, try

Hi, Attempting to use cvs with LLVM is producing the following: bash-2.05b$ cvs status cvs [status aborted]: connect to llvm-cvs.cs.uiuc.edu(128.174.245.58):2401 failed: Connection refused I think this has happened before and the root cause was a stuck xinetd process on the cvs server. Perhaps its time to file a bug against the cvs server's configuration? :) Reid. -------------- next part

On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Jingling Xue wrote: > I understand that LLVM is now available in the public domain. Yes it is. It can be downloaded from the LLVM releases page here: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/releases/ > I need to decide which compiler system I will use for my advanced > compiler course this year. The current release is 1.1. We are tentatively planning to release 1.2 sometime in

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3589 Bug ID: 3589 Summary: ControlMaster auto, persist and -f fail. Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.3p1 Hardware: amd64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

I would like to do a logistic multiple regression on a binary variate, with what Genstat calls an offset, ie a regression variable with the coefficient constrained=1. I'm far from home and have Splus but not R here, but any information from either source would be very welcome. I'd hate to have to go back to using Genstat . . . Thanks, Ted. --------------- Dr E.A. (Ted) Catchpole

Hello... I have a server with 4 x SCSI drives and I would like to install Centos 4 (or 5) onto a software RAID 10 array. Do you know if this is possible? I noticed that under the Centos 4.92 beta, RAID 5 is an option but for some reason RAID 10 is not listed. There does appear to be a RAID 10 module.... /lib/modules/2.6.9-42.0.8.ELsmp/kernel/drivers/md/raid10.ko More info I found here:

Hi Valery On 13 September 2010 19:07, Valery Khamenya <khamenya at gmail.com> wrote: > are there any attempts to use LLVM in graph-rewriting (term-rewriting) > language implementations? I've added a new LLVM backend to the ghc Haskell compiler. > How good is LLVM for this? Works very well. I'm operating from the low levels of the ghc compiler though where I don't

Hi, are there any attempts to use LLVM in graph-rewriting (term-rewriting) language implementations? How good is LLVM for this? E.g., is it natural to expect that the LLVM-based implementation of the language Concurrent Clean be any faster than its reference implementation? Best regards -- Valery A.Khamenya -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I am looking for some flow-sensitive (context-insensitive) alias analysis algorithm implemented in LLVM. (I use LLVM 3.9, hope to switch to 4.0 soon.) As far as I know, none of the built-in analysis (basicAA, globals-modref, andersAA, etc.) is intended to be flow-sensitive. So I searched and came across these two 1. https://github.com/unsw-corg/SVF by Yulei Sui (for LLVM 3.8) 2.

On Feb 19, 2010, at 13:09, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Feb 19, 2010, at 11:33 AM, james woodyatt wrote: >> >> Let us all now give a warm welcome to our new Haskell comrades! > > Very nice, care to add a GHC entry to the LLVM Users page? I'll prepare a patch that could be applied when the merge is formally released by the GHC developers. — j h woodyatt <jhw at

Hi all, A while ago there was a discussion on changing the current "set of trees" representation of TBAA metadata to be more expressive, prompted by the need to support C structs. Dan Gohman also talked about the issue here: http://llvm.org/devmtg/2012-11/Gohman-AliasAnalysis.pdf. It was suggested that the trees be replaced by a type DAG then. While working on this compiler

I sent the following message to the list nearly two weeks ago and didn't receive a single response. In fact, I haven't received any replies to the last 3-4 questions I have asked (over the past 6 months). Maybe it is my wording??? I see the messages in the digest, so I know they are going to the list. :-) I have no right to complain and only cause to be very happy with the rest of

A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text Size: 9490 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/19971119/a6f3d583/attachment.bat

Related questions to this have been asked before, but I have tried all options they gave me unsuccessfully (do.call and unlist). I start with three lists of summary statistics, 100 elements each, which I bind together: statslist <- as.data.frame(cbind (means, vars, mcrs)) I then take 100 samples of this data frame of varying lengths: stats <- lapply (1:100, function (dummy) {