Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "Quick notes on R with F7"
2007 Dec 01
4
Tuning F7 (CentOS 5) DomU (64 bit) for Oracle 11g (10GR2) install
Yesterday night I've tuned F7 DomU for Oracle 11g install
successfully installed Oracle , made checks for EM Console
and shutdown DomU.
Today morning :-
# xm start FDR7PVM
# xm console FDR7PVM
Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Kernel 2.6.20-2925.9.fc7xen on an x86_64
Server11G login: root
Password:
Module is unknown
Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Kernel 2.6.20-2925.9.fc7xen on an x86_64
2014 Apr 22
2
[LLVMdev] where is F7 opcode for TEST instruction on X86?
hi,
at the moment, TEST instruction is defined with 0xf7 opcode, as
demonstrated below.
$ echo "0xf7 0xc0 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x22"|./Release+Asserts/bin/llvm-mc
-disassemble -arch=x86
.section __TEXT,__text,regular,pure_instructions
testl $570425344, %eax ## imm = 0x22000000
however, i cannot find anywhere this F7 opcode is defined in
2007 Jun 26
0
Fw: F7 System crash with high network load
i didn''t got a response at gedora-xen, so reposting it here ...
looks like 3.1 still has stability issues with Networking and Dom0 ..
----- Forwarded by Sven Oehme/Germany/IBM on 06/26/07 05:33 PM -----
Sven Oehme/Germany/IBM
06/17/07 04:12 PM
To
fedora-xen@redhat.com
cc
Subject
F7 System crash with high network load
Hi,
i experienced it now a couple of time that my Dom0 will
2007 Jun 20
2
Expected behavior from: all(c(NA, NA, NA) < NA, na.rm = TRUE)?
Hi all,
Came across this curious behavior in:
R version 2.5.0 Patched (2007-06-05 r41831)
A simplified example is:
> all(c(NA, NA, NA) > NA, na.rm = TRUE)
[1] TRUE
Is this expected by definition?
If one reduces this to individual comparisons, such as :
> NA > NA
[1] NA
> all(NA > NA)
[1] NA
> all(NA > NA, na.rm = TRUE)
[1] TRUE
the initial comparison on the 3
2018 Mar 21
2
AMI potential memory leak
We are communicating with Asterisk via AMI. Running Asterisk version 13.18.5 on an Ubuntu box.
If you look at the event response, the Result field is filled with random characters. I'm not sure what to do because that is a completely random result. It makes no sense.
We send the following command to asterisk via AMI
Action: AGI
ActionID: C44415
Channel: SIP/192.168.40.105-00001338
2023 Mar 05
1
ocfs2 xattr
The message from this sender included one or more files
which could not be scanned for virus detection; do not
open these files unless you are certain of the sender's intent.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi,
I'm seeing the crash below on 6.1 and 6.2 kernels when trying to copy a
directory to OCFS2 filesystem. The problem seems to be that
2015 Nov 12
3
Inexplicable ASAN report. Code generation bug?
I'm struggling to explain an ASAN report I'm now getting that I didn't
get previously on the same code. In fact the report only happens with
-O2 and not when I remove the -O flags which makes it hard to debug
and makes me suspect it's dependent on exactly which instructions the
code generation decides to access the bytes involved. Afaict the C
code shouldn't be accessing the
2014 Aug 01
3
[LLVMdev] [PowerPC] ABI questions
On 30 Jul 2014, at 21:29, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> The ELFv1 ABI is used on 64-bit big-endian Linux and AIX.
There's one small difference between the two: with the 64 bit ELFv1/
SVR4 ABI, tail padding for structs passed by value is only performed
in case the struct is larger than 8 bytes, while for AIX 64 bit it's
always done. As an aside, on Darwin/ppc64 it's done if the
2018 Mar 22
2
AMI potential memory leak
HI Matt,
I am trying to replicate this particular problem. We are seeing more frequently where the Event: AsyncAGIExec is never being sent.
The two scenarios I have seen in tests yesterday and today...
We sendl an AMI action. For example, play a short file or hangup.
AMI Events will indicate it did the work, but we never receive the Event: AsyncAGIExec with a result at all.
Asterisk debug
2008 Jun 09
2
[LLVMdev] odd svn message
Going to check something in I get this, which I've never seen
before....is it is safe to just hit P and go on?
now what? svn commit config/i386/llvm-i386.cpp
Error validating server certificate for 'https://llvm.org:443':
- The certificate is not issued by a trusted authority. Use the
fingerprint to validate the certificate manually!
Certificate information:
- Hostname:
2007 Jul 14
2
vorbis-tools broken
It seems that oggdec in Fedora 7 produces a wav
header followed by lots of zeros. Building
vorbis-tools 1.0.1 from source produces a working
oggdec, so I think the problem is in the
vorbis-tools package.
I can't build vorbis-tools from svn due to some
make problems, but I can build the F7 SRPM.
There are no differences between the share and
oggdec directories, but there are autoconf
related
2012 Sep 17
1
How to filter information from a big .csv table into a new table
Hi,
I have big .csv file. I would like to filter that file into a new table.
For example, I have .csv file as below:
f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 f6 f7 f9 f10 f11
t1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
t2 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1
t3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
t4 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
t5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
t6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2012 Sep 18
1
chunk row to new table/file
I have big .csv file. I would like to filter that file into a new table.
For example, I have .csv file as below:
f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 f6 f7 f9 f10 f11
t1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
t2 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1
t3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
t4 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
t5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
t6 0 0 0 0 0 0
2008 Apr 30
1
X just died then restarted
Just had a weird thing happen that I've never encountered before.
Running Centos 5.x (updated) on 32-bit (Athlon XP).
Was going along in Firefox when suddenly my screen went black and the hard
drive light came on mostly steady for several seconds. After a little bit
I got back the X login screen. It normally comes up on F7, but F7 was dead
(with some text I'll paste in below in case it
2007 May 25
11
howto build xen from source with existing config?
hi,
i´m using fedora core 6 and want to build xen 3.1 from source for the 2.6.20
kernel. how can i build xen with the existing kernel-config from /boot (e.g.
config-2.6.20-1.2948.fc6xen) and an installed kernel-devel (source) package?
is it good to use this config or should i create a new one?
i searched the net and haven´t found any howto to build xen from source with
newer kernel versions and
2010 Oct 01
1
Multiple interfaces
Hi,
When is start one vpn i get the following result:
tinc10703003005 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr C2:F7:7B:75:47:1A
inet addr:192.168.3.20 Bcast:192.168.3.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::c0f7:7bff:fe75:471a/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX
2012 Jul 11
2
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] llc -march=nvptx64 -mcpu=sm_20 generates invalid zero align for device function params
Hello,
FYI, this is a bug http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13324
When compiling the following code for sm_20, func params are by some reason
given with .align 0, which is invalid. Problem does not occur if compiled
for sm_10.
> cat test.ll
; ModuleID = '__kernelgen_main_module'
target datalayout = "e-p:64:64-i64:64:64-f64:64:64-n1:8:16:32:64"
target triple =
2009 Aug 15
1
Peculiar difference between two Samba servers
I have two Samba servers acting with Server role: ROLE_DOMAIN_MEMBER running Samba 3.2.5.
Both have shares in their smb.conf, both are joined to Active Directory, and are using pam, nis, etc. so that users can authenticate against them (without having to re enter their passwords for each share) and see all permitted files.
Clients are a mixture Macs running OS X 10.5 and Windows clients. Windows
2007 Jul 17
2
Repetitive Kernel oops (and two smaller questions)
I have an F7 host that''s running the 2.6.20-2925.11.fc7xen 64-bit
kernel on a Dell 2950 using the latest 64-bit Xen packages in F7,
3.1.0-2.f7. I''m trying to install RHEL 5 386 as a guest which I hear
is possible. 64-bit RHEL5 isn''t available to use anyway. When I try
to paravirtualize the install and only utilize 1 CPU, I always get a
kernel oops right before the
2007 Sep 07
1
virt-factory investigation
Version 0.0.4 is out, but unfortunately unly for F7
According to:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/et-mgmt-tools/2007-September/msg00040.html
EL5 will be soon available.
All depends on busrpc(AMQP) package - available only in f7 for now.
So we need to wait even more....
-----------------------------------------------------------------
??? ? ??????? ???? ????, ?????? ???? ????????!
WWW.ZOOM.BG