similar to: How to correctly write a package?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "How to correctly write a package?"

2007 May 25
1
Problem with accessing internal variable in package.
I am writing a package, which contains several functions and variables. The variables are for internal use by functions. Functions are ment to be callable by a user. However, the function cannot access these variables. The package contains only R code, and was created using package.skeleton package.skeleton(name="ac9", list=c(ls(pattern="(AB2)|(ac9)"),
2001 Sep 07
4
ext3-2.4-0.9.9
Patches against 2.4.10-pre4 and 2.4.9-ac9 are at http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/ It's a fairly large change. The most significant parts are * the inclusion of Stephen's error-handling work, which is designed to remount the fs read-only in the presence of software and hardware errors, rather than forcing a panic. * Stephen's fix for the journal_revoke assertion
2001 Sep 06
1
quota problems with ext3/249-ac9
Hi! I've got some "serious" quota-problems with ext3... it seems not to work at all... I'm currently running 249-ac9 with no patches, slackware 7.x-current from january or so, all the quota-utils from the original distribution. the kernel prompts correctly "VFS: Diskquotas version dquot_6.5.0 initialized" and that was it. neither quotacheck nor repquota or any other
2001 Sep 16
1
interactivity.patch
Has anyone had any success with the interactivity.patch on the ext3 website? I'm going to try to use it because I've had a lot of lockups in past day under heavy load with 2.4.9-ac9, and I can't figure out if it's because of ext3 or VM or my crappy VIA IDE controller.
2001 Sep 19
1
Why is .journal file sometimes visible and sometimes not?
Hi. I recently migrated two machines from ext2 to ext3. Kernels (nearly identical) are 2.4.9-ac9 + preemptivity-patch + wrr-patch. The Installations are based on Mandrake 7.2 + 8.0. Also I have e2fstools-1.23 newly compiled on them. Both machines have two ext3 partitions (root + multimedia-data). On one machine I see a .journal file on both partitions, on the other machine (Mandrake-8.0)
2011 Dec 16
2
package.skeleton()
Hi-- I'm creating an R package, I've read through "Writing R Extensions" and the package.skeleton() R page-- and I'm still running into a little confusion. I would greatly appreciate any advice you can provide. Where do I run my following line of code from?: > package.skeleton(name = "a", code_files = "EsetObject.r" I'm currently running it from
2009 Jul 24
4
Include files?
Hi, I have 15 or 20 functions I've written to convert the sort of data I'm working with. They are currently in their own R file which I load by hand in Rgui before loading and running my main programs. Is there any way to have this file included in my R program like #include might in C? If not is there a simple newbie-type example of how to create a package so I could just say
2014 Jul 08
3
Paquete generado no detectan ambiente particular creado.
Buenos días: Por favor, ¿alguien podría crear un script de r con este código que envío e intentar paquetizarlo?. Yo siempre lo conseguía, pero con la versión actual de R (3.1.0), una vez generado el zip del paquete y cargado desde la RGui, no me detecta la existencia del environment que creé (.Ch.env). Es como si ahora el pkt sólo pudiera estar integrado (a efectos prácticos) por funciones, sin
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
happens. It also appears that somewhere in steps 1 and 2 above Word sends a request to turn off the read,write,and execute bits for the owner of the file. When you look at this filesystem after the attempted save the original file does indeed have these bits cleared (i.e. the user has no read,write,or execute permissions on the file), and that I think is why the error is being generated.
2014 Jul 09
3
Resumen de R-help-es, Vol 65, Envío 13
Queridos, Me apunté a esta lista de correo con el objetivo de avanzar en mi proceso de aprendizaje con R y R-Commander. Mis limitados conocimientos me hacen ver que este no es el foro que necesito, su nivel es demasiado avanzado para mí. Si me podeis orientar para estar en el foro adecuado que sería tener oportunidad de comentar problemas de los primeros pasos con R y R-Commander os lo
2009 Nov 12
1
saving custom functions to existing library
Hi all, I writen one function in Rgui(R Editor) I saved it as testfunction.R and while I am running that file using source(C:/testfunction.R) its running and it is giving subsequent result insted of this there is any thing like to save my function to save in existing library to reuse it when ever I want to use because I have to use those function from my C# code right now I am not able to
2010 Oct 07
1
packaging my function
Dear all, I write to you because there seems to be something I'm just not 'getting' in the way R lets you construct a new package. Google and this mailing list's archive don't seem to have the answer to my specific case so I signed up and mailed the question myself. So I've written this function that I wan't to make a package out of. Here is what I've done so far:
2009 Oct 16
3
package installation from source
Dear all I noticed from NEWS 2.11.0,dev SIGNIFICANT USER-VISIBLE CHANGES o Packages must have been installed under R 2.10.0 or later, as the current help system is the only one now supported. So I tried to follow instructions in manual, Duncan Murdoch presentation and help pages to prepare and accomplish installation of a set of functions I use. However in R 2.11.0dev and too in
2002 Jul 08
0
(no subject)
Which version should I use out of the list? Or do I install all of them, one after the other? ext3-2.4-0.9.9-2410p4.gz 05Sep01 (Against 2.4.10-pre4) (Changelog) ext3-2.4-0.9.9-249ac9.gz 05Sep01 (Against 2.4.9-ac9) ext3-2.4-0.9.10-2410.gz 23Sep01 (Against 2.4.10) (Changelog) patch-rml-2.4.10-ac3-ext3-0.9.9-with-dir-speedup-1.gz 01Oct01 (From Robert Love. Unofficial :-))
2002 Jul 11
1
(no subject)
Which version should I use out of the list? Or do I install all of them, one after the other? ext3-2.4-0.9.9-2410p4.gz 05Sep01 (Against 2.4.10-pre4) (Changelog) ext3-2.4-0.9.9-249ac9.gz 05Sep01 (Against 2.4.9-ac9) ext3-2.4-0.9.10-2410.gz 23Sep01 (Against 2.4.10) (Changelog) patch-rml-2.4.10-ac3-ext3-0.9.9-with-dir-speedup-1.gz 01Oct01 (From Robert Love. Unofficial :-))
2010 Apr 29
3
Ogg index and Skeleton 4.0
Hi everybody, I've updated OggIndex to now output Skeleton 4.0 tracks. The differences between Skeleton 3.x and Skeleton 4.0 with OggIndex is: * The fisbone packet now includes a "Radix" field. * The fisbone packet now includes two new compulsory message headers; "Role" and "Name". * The fishead packet no longer includes "start time"
2009 May 04
5
Convert skeleton to "regular" format
Hi there, we just encountered a problem with some tools obviously encoding into the skeleton format by default, which leads to problems with several other tools, in that particular case it's oggCut. When we try to edit/cut an ogg file with it, the program crashes with a segfault. I was able to locate and fix the problem in the oggCut source but I am wondering how to convert my ogg files to a
2020 Jun 06
3
Change in package.skeleton behavior from R 3.6.3 to R 4.0.0 ?
The Rcpp package and some related packages such as RcppArmadillo make use of (local) wrappers around the utils::package.skeleton() function for creating (basic yet functional) packages using Rcpp or RcppArmadillo. RStudio also exposes this under the graphical menu as a nice way to construct a package. But it seems that something changed quite recently in R. I looked into this a little yesterday
2014 Aug 22
2
Merging Ogg streams whilst updating the Skeleton?
Hi All I'm currently trying to put together an ogg file with two theora streams, a handful of audio streams (probably mixed vorbis and opus), and a Skeleton stream that describes their relationships to each other. I had hoped to be able to use the oggz suite of tools, but I can't seem to get that to work. To generate my theora files, I'm using ffmpeg2theora, which will happily
2007 Oct 01
2
Re: Peer review draft for the new
"Silvia Pfeiffer" <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: ... > First though let me start a discussion on skeleton here, which is > fundamental to this rfc and for which I'd like to get more input from > everyone. > > I think, "application/ogg" makes not much sense without having > skeleton inside the ogg file. Half the reason for having a generic, >