similar to: fix for a major format.pval limitation

Full_Name: Charles Dupont Version: 2.4.1 OS: linux 2.6.18 Submission from: (NULL) (160.129.129.136) 'format.pval' has a major limitation in its implementation. For example suppose a person had a vector like 'a' and the error being ?0.001. > a <- c(0.1, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.3, 0.0001) > format.pval(a, eps=0.01) If that person wants to have the 'format.pval'

'format.pval' has a major limitation in its implementation for example suppose a person had a vector like 'a' and the error being ?0.001. > a <- c(0.1, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.3, 0.0001) > format.pval(a, eps=0.001) The person wants to have the 'format.pval' output with 2 digits always showing like this [1] "0.10" "0.30"

Hi List, My goal is to force R not to print in scientific notation in the sixth column (rel_diff - for the p-value) of my data frame (not a matrix). I have used the format.pval () and printCoefmat () functions on the data frame. The R script is appended below. This issue is that use of the format.pval () and printCoefmat () functions on the data frame gives me the desired results, but coerces

Today I stumbled upon a very strange behaviour of format.pval. If all p values are below the threshold eps one gets format.pval(c(0.0002, 0.0004), eps = 0.001) ## [1] "< 0.001" "< 0.001" format.pval(0.0004, eps = 0.001) ## [1] "< 0.001" i.e., "< [eps]" as described in the manual of format.eps. Yet, if one ore more are above (and one or more

I can reproduce this. It has to do with whether the value rounds down to 9 or up to 10, and thus needs another space, I think. I agree that it shouldn't happen, but at least you can get rid of the space by using trim = TRUE. # rounds to 9 vs 10 format(9.95, digits = 2) format(9.96, digits = 2) format(9.95, digits = 2, nsmall = 2) format(9.96, digits = 2, nsmall = 2) format(9.95, digits =

>From the help page of format, nsmall should control the number of digits. > format(0.123456789, nsmall = 10) [1] "0.1234567890" > format(0.123456789, nsmall = 1) [1] "0.1234568" > format(0.123456789, nsmall = 2) [1] "0.1234568" > format(0.123456789, nsmall = 8) [1] "0.12345679" It adds zeros fine but for

Dear Dr. Graves Many thanks for your response. FDRs and their associated q values do differ from Type I error rates and P values (See Storey and Tibshirani PNAS 2003;100:9440-5). It is an approach that is rapidly gaining popularity in the analysis of genomic data where we have massive numbers of covariates measured on a comparatively modest number of subjects. To my mind it is a real advance

Full_Name: Dirk Jacob Version: R 2.8.1 and 2.9.1 OS: Win XP Submission from: (NULL) (153.96.32.62) I want to convert numbers to strings like: > inputs= c(0.3+0*(1:12) ) > (format(inputs,digits=3,scientific=T,collapse=" ")) and it works [1] "3e-01" "3e-01" "3e-01" "3e-01" "3e-01" "3e-01" "3e-01"

Please help me to produce smoothed contour plots. I have dependent data generated at regular intervals of two independent variables and would like to produce smoothed contour plots - I cannot get interp (alima) to produce cubic interpolations of the data, only linear ones. I'm interested in smoothing as the data generation process is stochastic and produces small variations which I'd

when running the command > length(a <- 1:5) <- 4 there are two responses. If 'a' does not exist then the response is Error in length(a <- 1:5) <- 4 : object "a" not found If 'a' does exist then the response is Error in length(a <- 1:5) <- 4 : could not find function "<-<-" I would assume that 'length(a <- 1:5) <-

Please help me to produce smoothed contour plots. I have dependent data generated at regular intervals of two independent variables and would like to produce smoothed contour plots - I cannot get interp (alima) to produce cubic interpolations of the data, only linear ones. I'm interested in smoothing as the data generation process is stochastic and produces small variations which I'd

Dear R Core Team, First of all, thank you for your amazing work on developing and maintaining this wonderful language. I just stumbled upon the following behavior in R version 3.6.0: format(9.91, digits = 2, nsmall = 2) format(9.99, digits = 2, nsmall = 2) yield "9.91" and " 9.99" with an extraneous whitespace. My expected output for the second command is

The format.info() function currently takes args (x, digits = NULL, nsmall = 0), while format.default() takes many more: function (x, trim = FALSE, digits = NULL, nsmall = 0, justify = c("left", "right", "centre", "none"), width = NULL, na.encode = TRUE, scientific = NA, big.mark = "", big.interval = 3, small.mark = "",

Why is there no is.Date function in R? I am running 2.1.1 does it exist in newer version? If there is a reasoning behind the lack of a is.Date function what is it? Thanks Charles -- Charles Dupont Computer System Analyst School of Medicine Phone: (615) 936-6510 Department of Biostatistics Vanderbilt University

[This turned into a bug report which will go to r-devel, so I have taken it off r-help.] Bugs reported here: (1) formatC's help page need some clarification. (2) formatC needs to treat modes "double" and "real" as equivalent. (3) format's help page or (preferably) format needs correction re the meaning of `digits' On Sun, 28 Feb 1999, Martin Maechler wrote:

Hi I am using the latex() command from the Hmisc package to export table to latex. For formating of the values, I use the format() function. But I don't manage to get the format of the values right: I don't want scientific notation, but if I say scientific=FALSE, I get many digits after the decimal point which I can not control with digits=... and nsmall=... in the format command.

Hi list, I have a problem with dovecot 2.2.5 and nightly (latest 20130923) with : * plugin listescape enabled * shared mailbox * and mail_shared_explicit_inbox = no Problem is I can't get list of mails in INBOX of my shared users. For example : ---------------------------------------------------------- 2013-09-23 22:20:06 imap-login: Info: Login: user=<roms>, method=PLAIN,

Hi! If I use format() on numeric vector, na.encode argument does not have any e= ffect. This was reported before: - https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2007-October/143881.html - http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e2/devel/06/09/0360.html It works for other (say character) classes! > format(c("a", NA), na.encode=3DTRUE) [1] "a " "NA" >

I have a migration that is failing. I am trying to create new records in a table. class BasicAnswerTypes < ActiveRecord::Migration def self.up # this adds basic answer types and response types to the database ResponseType.create :name => "boolean" end def self.down ResponseType.find_by_name("boolean").destroy end end when I run rake

Hi, I have the following matrix, which is printed %e format (in C's way). I am wondering how make it be printed in %f format (in C's way)? Regards, Peng > significant_analysis_results[,7:8] pval(ki-wt) pval(ko-wt) Nab2 1.913348979e-06 2.731944670e-09 Rasal1 2.482254110e-05 1.054711084e-05 Ccndbp1 6.307674516e-08 2.268947934e-04 Svep1 0.000000000e+00