similar to: gc()$Vcells < 0 (PR#9345)

Full_Name: Don Maszle Version: 1.7.0 OS: Linux Submission from: (NULL) (206.86.87.3) This was previously reported I believe as bug 1653. I just compiled 1.7.0 on RedHat Linux and I get terrible behavior when panel=plot. Browsing through the coplot code, I don't how there could be this dependency. With panel=points, my 7 graphs come out numbered as given 7 4 5 6 1 2 3 Using panel=plot the

Full_Name: Don Maszle Version: 2.3.0 OS: Solaris 9 - 64 bit compile Submission from: (NULL) (206.86.87.3) After closing an X11() window by either clicking on the close button or by calling dev.off(), R 2.3.0 segfaults as shown below. Calling layout() before any X11() device is opened just opens a new device and applies the layout. $ R R : Copyright 2006, The R Foundation for Statistical

I am getting "Error: cannot allocate vector of size 197 MB". I know that similar problems were discussed a lot already, but I didn't find any satisfactory answers so far! Details: *** I have XP (32bit) with 4GB ram. At the time when the problem appeared I had 1.5GB of available physical memory. *** I increased R memory limit to 3GB via memory.limit(3000) *** I did gs() and got

Dear all, I am working on a 64 bits Linux system. I issue the following R commands: > rm(list=ls()) # To remove all objects in the workspace. > gc() # To free memory. used (Mb) gc trigger (Mb) max used (Mb) Ncells 124250 6.7 350000 18.7 350000 18.7 Vcells 124547 1.0 786432 6.0 476934 3.7 > gc() # I had to do it again, don't know why! used (Mb) gc trigger (Mb) max used (Mb) Ncells

Full_Name: Don Maszle Version: R version 2.8.1 (2008-12-22) OS: Linux hood.mendelbio.com 2.6.18-128.el5 #1 SMP Wed Dec 17 11:41:38 EST 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Submission from: (NULL) (206.86.87.3) I have resolved the problem, but this is a possible regression to a problem listed in the bug fixes for 2.3.1. After a new installation, help.search() on any search string without a

I came across this in a simulation I ran under 1.6.0: If I do something like R> x <- rnorm(10) R> rval <- NULL R> for(i in 1:100000) rval <- t.test(x)$p.value then the process size remains at about 14M under 1.5.1, but it seems to be almost linearly growing up to more than 100M under 1.6.0. I know that the above simulation is nonsense, but it was the simplest I could come up

dear R experts: I am of course no R experts, but use it regularly. I thought I would share some experimentation with memory use. I run a linux machine with about 4GB of memory, and R 2.5.0. upon startup, gc() reports used (Mb) gc trigger (Mb) max used (Mb) Ncells 268755 14.4 407500 21.8 350000 18.7 Vcells 139137 1.1 786432 6.0 444750 3.4 This is my baseline. linux

Please, I have a 2GB computer and a huge time-series to embedd, and i tried increasing memory.limit() and memory.size(max=TRUE), but nothing. Just before the command: > memory.size(max=TRUE) [1] 13.4375 > memory.limit() [1] 1535.875 > gc() used (Mb) gc trigger (Mb) max used (Mb) Ncells 209552 5.6 407500 10.9 350000 9.4 Vcells 125966 1.0 786432 6.0 496686 3.8

Dear All, I am running R in a system with the following configuration *Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz OS: Ubuntu X86_64 10.10 RAM: 24 GB* The R session info is * R version 2.14.1 (2011-12-22) Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit) locale: [1] LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C [3] LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8 [5] LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF-8

Hello all again, I want to do bitwise addition in R. I am trying to generate a matrix 0000 0001 0010 .... .... 1111 I know the other ways of generating this matrix but I need to look at bitwise addition. Any suggestions??? thanks a lot Nameeta ------------------------------------------------- This email is intended only for the use of the individual or...{{dropped}}

Hi, I've been having similar experiences and haven't been able to substantially improve the efficiency using the guidance in the I/O Manual. Could anyone advise on how to improve the following scan()? It is not based on my real file, please assume that I do need to read in characters, and can't do any pre-processing of the file, etc. ## Create Sample File

How do people deal with R and memory issues? I have tried using gc() to see how much memory is used at each step. Scanned Crawley R-Book and all other R books I have available and the FAQ on-line but no help really found. Running WinXP Pro (32 bit) with 4 GB RAM. One SATA drive pair is in RAID 0 configuration with 10000 MB allocated as virtual memory. I do have another machine

Hi developers, After some investigation I have found there can be large discrepancies in the same object being saved as an external "xx.RData" file. The immediate repercussion of this is the possible increased size of your .RData workspace for no apparent reason. The function and its three scenarios below highlight these discrepancies. Note that the object being returned is exactly

I can't run a function which generates random numbrers using linear congruential generator. My multiplier is a=5+8^6, increment is b=1 and modulo is m=2^30. the code I have written works for modulo upto m=2^28. For m= 2^29 , it says, can not allocate memory for the vector or something like that. For m= 2^31 or more, its says the argument "for i in 1:m " is too large in

Good afternoon, I have a 63 small .csv files which I process daily, and until two weeks ago they processed just fine and only took a matter of moments and had non noticeable memory problem. Two weeks ago they have reached 318 lines and my script "broke". There are some missing-values in some of the files. I have tried hard many times over the last two weeks to create a

This might be because I didn't get it right, but; I thought R would release memory back to the system as (big) objects get removed? Here is my platform (with 1Gb of RAM): platform sparc-sun-solaris2.8 arch sparc os solaris2.8 system sparc, solaris2.8 status major 1 minor 3.1 year 2001 month 08 day 31 language R A little example: Start a new section of R, with

Hi, Profiling shows that 65-70% of the time of my program is spent inside a single function -- this is not surprising, as it is inside an optimize call inside a loop (this is a dynamic programming problem). I would like to speed this up. The function does very little: has a single argument, evaluates a spline at that argument, does some simple arithmetic with it (adding constants,

Has anyone figured out how to create a destructor in R.oo? How I'd like to use it: I have an object which opens a connection thru RODBC (held as a private member) It would be nice if the connection closes automatically (inside the destructor) when an object gets gc()'ed. Thanks in advance. Regards, Ken BTW, a >BIG< thanks to Henrik Bengtsson for creating the R.oo package! Lucky

Dear All, I am running R in a system with the following configuration *Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz OS: Ubuntu X86_64 10.10 RAM: 24 GB* The R session info is * R version 2.14.1 (2011-12-22) Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit) locale: [1] LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C [3] LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8 [5] LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF-8

This setOldClass(c("file", "connection")) .A <- setRefClass("A", fields=list(con="connection"), methods=list( finalize = function() { if (isOpen(con)) close(con) })) f <- tempdir() a <- .A$new(con=file(f, "rb")) close(a$con) a <- .A$new(con=file(f,