similar to: Formal methods are not loaded from NAMESPACE in reloaded workspace image

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Formal methods are not loaded from NAMESPACE in reloaded workspace image"

2006 Nov 03
1
Formal methods are not loaded from NAMESPACE in reloadedworkspace image
Dear R-Devel subscriber, as a follow up to my yesterday's email: I tested an analogous example with the S4-package "flexclust" by executing the following code: library(flexclust) example(cclust) cl After saving the work space and starting a new R process with the restored work space, the same behaviour (i.e., the methods pertinent to "flexclust" are not used, even after
2006 Nov 03
2
WG: Formal methods are not loaded from NAMESPACE inreloadedworkspace image
Sorry, to bother the list one more time: but the following worked at least for 'urca': in NAMESPACE I now included explicitly: import(methods) a fix of the 'urca'-package will be uploaded to CRAN on the weekend. Fritz, will this work for ypur package 'flexclust' too? I have in my DESCRIPTION imports: methods and in flexclust it is in depends: methods. However, both
2004 Mar 26
0
Package update: 'urca' version 0.3-3
Dear R-list member, an update of package 'urca' has been uploaded to CRAN (Mirror: Austria). In the updated release unit root and cointegration tests encountered in applied econometric analysis are implemented. The package is written in 'pure' R and utilises S4 classes. In particular, the Johansen procedure with likelihood ratio tests for the inclusion of a linear trend,
2008 Jan 10
1
question regarding kpss tests from urca, uroot and tseries packages
Hi R users! I've come across using kpss tests for time series analysis and i have a question that troubles me since i don't have much experience with time series and the mathematical part underlining it. x<-c(253, 252, 275, 275, 272, 254, 272, 252, 249, 300, 244, 258, 255, 285, 301, 278, 279, 304, 275, 276, 313, 292, 302, 322, 281, 298, 305, 295, 286, 327, 286, 270, 289, 293, 287,
2007 Oct 24
0
Different results in the unit root test. Why?
Situation: I had tired a 1000-data generated by random error(i.i.d.), then I sub it into different unit root tests. I got different results among the tests. The following are the test statistics I got: adf.test @ tseries ~ -10.2214 (lag = 9) ur.df @ urca ~ -21.8978 ur.sp @ urca ~ -27.68 pp.test @ tseries ~ -972.3343 (truncation lag =7) ur.pp @ urca ~ -973.2409 ur.kpss @ urca ~ 0.1867 kpss.test @
2006 Oct 27
2
all.names() and all.vars(): sorting order of functions' return vector
Dear list-subscriber, in the process of writing a general code snippet to extract coefficients in an expression (in the example below: 0.5 and -0.7), I stumbled over the following peculiar (at least peculiar to me:-) ) sorting behaviour of the function all.names(): > expr1 <- expression(x3 = 0.5 * x1 - 0.7 * x2) > all.names(expr1) [1] "-" "*" "x1"
2007 May 15
1
urca package - summary method -
Hi I am using the package urca and I am interested about the KPSS test. That works fine except the method "summary" did not work in the script, only when it is typed direct in the console the results are shown( not a source file). Is there any problem with these method ?
2008 Dec 16
1
Cointegration and ECM in Package {urca}
Dear R Core Team, I am using package {urca} to do cointegration and estimate ECM model, but I have the following two problems: (1) I use ca.jo() to do cointegration first and can get the cointegration rank, alpha and beta. The next step is to test some restrictions on beta with blrtest(),bh5lrtest(), and bh6lrtest(). But none of them can add restrictions on all the cointegration
2008 May 31
0
KPSS test - Lag selection
Hello everyone! Quite a similar question has been posed here some time ago, but there was no explicit solution offered. So I hope that it is OK to pose it again. I want to perform a KPSS test using the packages "urca" or "tseries". But I neither want to use the predefined lag structures, "short" and "long", nor specify the number of lags arbitrarily by
2012 Oct 08
1
Diagnostic testing in a VEC
Hi everyone, I'm using the Johansen framework to determine a VEC using package urca. I have estimated the corresponding VEC using likelihood ratio test for restrictions on alpha, beta or both and I have generated objects of the class cajo.test. Now I want to diagnostic tests in the model, like heteroskedasticity test, residuals normality and serial autocorrelation, but I cannot find the way
2007 Jun 15
2
Problem with workspace loading after languageR use
Hello R, To analyze multi-level data, I started learning and using lmer. So far so wonderful. I then found some useful functions in package languageR. But then the following problem ocurred: Whenever I load and use the languageR package, then save the workspace - or quit R with saving the workspace - I am unable to reload that workspace in a later session. That is, R doesn't start at all
2005 Mar 08
2
The null hypothesis in kpss test (kpss.test())
is that 'x' is level or trend stationary. I did this > s<-rnorm(1000) > kpss.test(s) KPSS Test for Level Stationarity data: s KPSS Level = 0.0429, Truncation lag parameter = 7, p-value = 0.1 Warning message: p-value greater than printed p-value in: kpss.test(s) My question is whether p=0.1 is a good number to reject N0? On the other hand, I have a
2005 May 02
1
Trying to understand kpss.test() in tseries package
I'm trying to understand how to use kpss.test() properly. If I have a level stationary series like rnorm() in the help page, shouldn't I get a small p-value with the null hypothesis set to "Trend"? The (condensed) output from kpss.test() for the two possible null hypotheses is given below. I don't see any significant difference between these results. > x <-
2007 Dec 08
2
time series tests
Hi all, Can anyone clear my doubts about what conclusions to take with the following what puts of some time series tests: > adf.test(melbmax) Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test data: melbmax Dickey-Fuller = -5.4075, Lag order = 15, p-value = 0.01 alternative hypothesis: stationary Warning message: p-value smaller than printed p-value in: adf.test(melbmax)
2006 Jul 06
2
KPSS test
Hi, Am I interpreting the results properly? Are my conclusions correct? > KPSS.test(df) ---- ---- KPSS test ---- ---- Null hypotheses: Level stationarity and stationarity around a linear trend. Alternative hypothesis: Unit root. ---- Statistic for the null hypothesis of level stationarity: 1.089 Critical values: 0.10 0.05 0.025 0.01 0.347 0.463
2003 Feb 11
0
NT_STATUS_TRUSTED_RELATIONSHIP_FAILURE
Sorry for reposting this message but my first post was posted as a reply wrongly... -------------- Hi, I'm trying to solve a problem for about 3 weeks ago and can't... I have debian here with samba (Version 2.999+3.0.alpha21-3 for Debian) acting as the PDC of domain CASA. I have two Windows XP Professional here in my home and since I was having problems with the local browser and
2006 Jul 06
1
Access values in kpssstat-class
Hi, How can I access the Values stored in kpssstat-class given by KPSS.test function and store it in a variable. For example: >x <- rnorm(1000) >test <- KPSS.test(ts(x)) >test ---- ---- KPSS test ---- ---- Null hypotheses: Level stationarity and stationarity around a linear trend. Alternative hypothesis: Unit root. ---- Statistic for the null
2004 Oct 13
4
incomplete function output
Dear R users, I have a function (below) which encompasses several tests. However, when I run it, only the output of the last test is displayed. How can I ensure that the function root(var) will run and display the output from all tests, and not just the last one? Thank you, b. root <- function(var) { #---Phillips-Perron PP.test(var, lshort = TRUE) PP.test(var, lshort = FALSE)
2005 Mar 09
1
about kpss.test()
Hi All, First of all, could you tell me what the "KPSS Level" in the output of the test means? I have a series, x, of periodic data and tried kpss.test() on it to verify its stationarity. The tests gave me the p-value above 0.1. Since the null hypothesis N0 is that the series _is_ stationary, this means that I cannot reject N0. But the series does look periodic! So does all this
2008 Apr 07
1
'URCA' is not a valid package Error
Thank you Matthieu for your helpful suggestions. Unfortunately I still have problems. I have tried to compile it via your suggestion. " this is strange... you should have the usual summary... I have on my machine library(urca) test2<-ur.df(nottem, type="none", lags=1) summary(test2) " When I type in "library(urca)" I receive the following. "Error in