similar to: error location

Hello, [Using LLVM r155315, according to `svn log | head`] I am experimenting with programatically building and jitting functions in a module, and I seem to be coming across a crash in some generated code. Using the llvm-c interface I build up the module which dumps like this: ; ModuleID = 'MyModule' target datalayout = "i686-apple-darwin11" target triple =

Hi, I'm using R-2.12 on a linux 64bit machine. When I run a chunk of code inside a foreach() %do% { ...} or %dopar% {...} (with doMC backend) I keep getting a segfault. Running the *same* code within lapply(something, function(x) ... ) doesn't result in any segfaults. I'll paste the output below, but I'm not sure it would be helpful. I'm more curious how to go about smoking

Hi, I am expieriencing strange behaviour of llvm's optimization passes and I don't understand what I am doing wrong. Basically all I've done is extracting code for optimization of a llvm-function in a llvm-module and put it into a separate function for better readability. The original code looks like follows (and works as expected): ----------------------------- std::string

Hi David, I'm not certain, but to me the "LLVMSetTarget(module, "i686-apple-darwin11");" line looks suspicious. I'm not familiar with all the ins and outs of how target triples get handled, but it looks to me like that's requesting 32-bit code. I think that if you omit that line completely then the target will be inferred from the execution environment. My best

Hi, I am expieriencing strange behaviour of llvm's optimization passes and I don't understand what I am doing wrong. Basically all I've done is extracting code for optimization of a llvm-function in a llvm-module and put it into a separate function for better readability. The original code looks like follows (and works as expected): ----------------------------- std::string

Hi, supposing I have a function “foo” like the following: int foo(int a, int b) { ... ... } I want to insert int the LLVM IR a call instructions to a function “bar” that requires the same parameters of foo. So my function foo will become: int foo(int a, int b) { bar(a,b); … ... } I am using the following code: bool ThreadSanitizer::runOnFunction(Function &F) {

I'm trying to move from Matlab to R, and I'm stuck even getting started. This sounds to me like the dumbest question in the world but... how does one put R source code in files? Over the last three days I've gone front to back through the Introduction to R and the R Language Definition, and while I'm excited that the language is so Lispish, none of what I read described how to

Full_Name: Adriano Azevedo Filho Version: 2.9.0 OS: Windows Vista Submission from: (NULL) (201.68.79.62) The error message produced when the function name typed in the console is misspelled in the Portuguese translation. This is not a new issue but as it is around for sometime I've decided to report. As this is a frequent message when beginners start using R, it gives an unfortunate bad

I am trying to convert a matlab code to R. Most of the conversion statements are simple, but problem is with return. Since it's a recursive function it's a bit complicated. Anyway in matlab we can have return statment like [price, notional] = functionname() and also for the same function... notional(1) = functionname() how to do this in R? i have tried using data frame but still

Within a function I'd often like to obtain a text string equal to the name of the function. One use for this: To generate a filename for use in pdf(). This enables me to keep track of which function generated a particular graphic came. match.call() puts parentheses at the end of the name. I don't want parentheses in a filename. The following kludgey function gives the desired result.

I have a large computation that performs various bootstrap resampling loops over pairs of samples using lapply(). After a few seconds it stops like this > do.summarize.effects(compute.power=T) ... Error: Unimplemented feature in rep > .Traceback [[1]] [1] "rep(no, length = length(ans))" [[2]] [1] "ifelse(t.howto == \"n\", boot.result, l.meanboot.test(onew.x,

I just upgraded from 2.8.1 to 2.10 on Windows Vista. BIG MISTAKE apparently because now when I type: > help(functionname) or ?functionname I get only a small text window giving some very basic info on the topic, e.g.: base-package package:base R Documentation The R Base Package Description: Base R functions Details: This package contains the

Currently I have a for loop executing functions and at the end I get a message like: There were 50 or more warnings (use warnings() to see the first 50) If I do what it says and type warnings(), I get 50 messages like: 2: In !is.na(x) & !is.na(rowSums(xreg)) : longer object length is not a multiple of shorter object length I am not sure what function these errors are originating from.

Martin, thanks for the good news and sorry for wasting your (and others time) by not doing my homework and query bugzilla first (lesson learned! ). I have tested the new implementation from R-devel and observe a semantic difference when playing with the parameters: # Test script 1 g <- "global" f <- function(p) { l <- "local" dump.frames() }

Dear R friends, to allow post-mortem debugging In my Rscript based batch jobs I use tryCatch( <R expression>, error = function(e) { dump.frames(to.file = TRUE) }) to write the called frames into a dump file. This is similar to the method recommended in the "Writing R extensions" manual in section 4.2 Debugging R code (page 96):

Hi folks, I’m working on adding an API for incremental updates to DominatorTree and I noticed that there isn’t a simple way to quickly build and update CFG (just for testing) -- one has to either build CFG programmatically, or write IR by hand and manually map pointers to basic blocks. The downside is that it tends to be pretty verbose and not easy to update (e.g. adding a new edge often involves

Dear Fellow R Users, I have recently come across a weird problem with help.search: > help.search("tps") Error in rbind(...) : number of columns of matrices must match (see arg 8) > This happens no matter what I search for... Any thoughts ? Thanks, Tolga Please follow the attached hyperlink to an important disclaimer

If users post a bug or problem issue to an R-based news group (R-devel, R-help, BioC - though BioC is far more forgiving) they get yelled at for not reading the posting guide and FAQ. "Please *_do_* read the FAQ, the posting guide, ..." the yellers do say. So I read the BioC FAQ and it says... http://www.bioconductor.org/docs/faq/ "Bug reports on packages should perhaps be

If users post a bug or problem issue to an R-based news group (R-devel, R-help, BioC - though BioC is far more forgiving) they get yelled at for not reading the posting guide and FAQ. "Please *_do_* read the FAQ, the posting guide, ..." the yellers do say. So I read the BioC FAQ and it says... http://www.bioconductor.org/docs/faq/ "Bug reports on packages should perhaps be

I have a large number of troff help files which are automatically converted to .Rd files. Many of these have examples which contain the printed output of the examples. This makes example(functionname) not work. Is there a way to avoid removing all this output by delimiting it in some way such that the output will not appear in R-ex? Secondly, it would be nice if there was a place where output