similar to: attributes of S4 objects

Hello. This question concerns the Methods package. I have created a new class and am trying to set a method for it for S4 group generic "Summary". I have run into some signature problems. An example: > setClass("track", representation(x="numeric", y="character")) [1] "track" > setGeneric("max", group="Summary")

Dear R developers, Motivated by discussion about checking inheritance of S3 and S4 objects (in head matrix/array topic) I would light to shed some light on a minor gap about that matter in R C API. Currently we are able to check inheritance for S3 class objects from C in a robust way (no allocation, thread safe). This is unfortunately not possible for S4 classes. I would kindly request new

Thank you Luke. That is why I don't use Rf_inherits but INHERITS which does not allocate, provided in the email body. I cannot do similarly for S4 classes, thus asking for some API for that. On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 5:56 PM Tierney, Luke <luke-tierney at uiowa.edu> wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Nov 2019, Jan Gorecki wrote: > > > Dear R developers, > > > > Motivated by

Hi R-devel, If you did read my survey on Rhelp about reporting, you may have seen that I am implementing a way to handle outputs for R (mainly target output destinations: xHTML and TeX). In fact: I does have something that works for basic objects, entirely done with S4 classes, with the results visible at: http://www.stat.ucl.ac.be/ROMA/sample.htm http://www.stat.ucl.ac.be/ROMA/sample.pdf To

I am extending a DBI connection by setClass("TSPostgreSQLConnection", contains=c("PostgreSQLConnection","TSdbOptions")) but the first time I use this I am getting a warning when it tries to coerce the TSPostgreSQLConnection to a PostgreSQLConnection. After the first use the warning stops, but the first warning is causing me problems when I do automatic checks

I am having some trouble creating a hierarchy of virtual classes (akin to the class structure in the 'Matrix' package). I think they arise from my not understanding the best way to specify virtual subclasses of a virtual class. please see questions below code. setClass("mom") setClass("kid1", representation("mom", "VIRTUAL"))

all of a sudden, after a SparseM upgrade(?) I get this error: > str(z) Formal class 'matrix.csr' [package "SparseM"] with 4 slots ..@ ra : num [1:85372672] -0.4288 0.0397 0.0104 -0.1843 -0.1203 ... ..@ ja : int [1:85372672] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... ..@ ia : int [1:699777] 1 123 245 367 489 611 733 855 977 1099 ... ..@ dimension: int [1:2] 699776 122

the following returns an error in an 'exists' call on my machine MyEnv <- new.env() setClass("Numeric", "numeric", where=MyEnv) franklin parlamis > version _ platform powerpc-apple-darwin8.7.0 arch powerpc os darwin8.7.0 system powerpc, darwin8.7.0 status beta major 2 minor 4.0 year

i think these two code snippets exhibit a bug. they are identical but for the inclusion of an initial line in snippet [2] [1] setMethod("Math", signature(x = "numeric"), function(x) "Works") getGeneric("sqrt")(4) [2] getGeneric("sqrt")(4) setMethod("Math", signature(x = "numeric"), function(x) "Works")

'methods' package feature request / discussion starter: perhaps a call to 'validObject' should occur at part of any slot replacement operation (and the operation not be carried out if it would invalidate the object)? this may prevent the need for prophylactic 'validObject' calls in other user-defined functions. in the example below, the slot assignment occurs

Hi everyone and thanks for being patient. I've used "!.foo"() et seq pro tem. Next problem: how to define "Summary" methods for brobs. ?max says 'max' and 'min' are generic functions: methods can be defined for them individually or via the 'Summary' group generic. For this to work properly, the arguments '...' should be

I have J Chambers wonderful text ( Software for data Analysis) and I've been trying my hand at some very routine S4 OOP development. One of the things I was trying to do was to create some very basic S4 classes. The first was simply a class that had a data.frame as part of its representation. setClass("df",representation(dirframe="data.frame")) The object basically

I do lots of analyses on large microarray data sets so memory use and speed and both important issues for me. I have been trying to estimate the overheads associated with using formal S4 data objects instead of ordinary lists for large data objects. In some simple experiments (using R 1.7.1 in Windows 2000) with large but simple objects it seems that giving a data object a formal class

please see the code below. foo2 fails to dispatch correctly, but foo does fine. i have tried 'cacheMetaData(1)' and a number of different variants of 'cacheGenericsMetaData', on the possibility there is a caching issue. but i still can't sort it out. also one general question: does it really matter what's in the body of the function definition in a

Something has changed in the S4 default for coercing. Am I now suppose to use setAs, or is there something else I should do to make this work: R version 2.7.0 (2008-04-22) .... > require("methods") > setClassUnion("OptionalPOSIXct", c("POSIXct", "NULL")) [1] "OptionalPOSIXct" > setClass("TSmetax",

Greetings, I'm still very new to R; however I have been tasked with converting an S4 object into a data.frame. We are just trying to learn the basics of S4. Could anyone offer a 'simple' example of coercing an S4 object (such as might be stored in a package attribute) into a data.frame? Ultimately, we would like to do something along the lines of mydata <- as.data.frame(original

Hi, I was stumped by this. The two S4 objects below looked exactly the same: > a1 An object of class "A" Slot "aa": integer(0) > a2 An object of class "A" Slot "aa": integer(0) > str(a1) Formal class 'A' [package ".GlobalEnv"] with 1 slots ..@ aa: int(0) > str(a2) Formal class

On Fri, 1 Nov 2019, Jan Gorecki wrote: > Dear R developers, > > Motivated by discussion about checking inheritance of S3 and S4 > objects (in head matrix/array topic) I would light to shed some light > on a minor gap about that matter in R C API. > Currently we are able to check inheritance for S3 class objects from C > in a robust way (no allocation, thread safe). This is

On Fri, 1 Nov 2019, Jan Gorecki wrote: > Thank you Luke. > That is why I don't use Rf_inherits but INHERITS which does not > allocate, provided in the email body. Your definition can allocate because STING_ELT can allocate. getAttrib can GC in general. Currently it would not GC or allocate in this case, but this could change. You can't assume thread-safety for calls into the R

On the help page "DateTimeClasses {base}" it says: "One can add or subtract a number of seconds or a difftime object from a date-time object, but not add two date-time objects." However, > x<-Sys.time(); y<-Sys.time()+3600 > diff<-y-x > x; y; diff [1] "2005-11-23 19:58:20 GMT" [1] "2005-11-23 20:58:20 GMT" Time difference of 1 hours