similar to: advice on arguments

Hi all, For some reason, I would like to use functions bellow (see example code bellow), but instead I get the following error message: *Error in foo2(...) : unused argument(s) (arg3 = 3)* #--------------------- # example code #--------------------- foo1 <- function(arg1,...) { print(arg1) foo2(...) foo3(...) } foo2 <- function(arg2) { print(arg2) } foo3 <- function(arg3) {

Dear List: In short, I am writing a number of functions as building blocks for other functions and have some questions about scoping and passing arguments. Suppose I have functions foo1, foo2, and foo3 such that: foo1<-function(a=1,b=TRUE,c=FALSE){#do stuff}; foo2<-function(x=1,y=FALSE,z=c(1,2,3,4)){#do stuff}; foo3<-function(lambda,...){lambda*foo1()*foo2()}; I want to be able to

Thank you very much for your useful suggestions. These are exactly what I was looking for. foo <- list(foo1, foo2, foo3) lapply(foo, function(x) matrix(unlist(x), nrow = length(x), byrow = TRUE)) or lapply(foo, function(x) do.call('rbind', x)) Best, Muhammad Subianto On 4/11/06, Muhammad Subianto <msubianto at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear all, > I have a result my experiment

Dear all, I have a result my experiment like this below (here my toy example): foo1 <- list() foo1[[1]] <- c(10, 20, 30) foo1[[2]] <- c(11, 21, 31) foo2 <- list() foo2[[1]] <- c(100, 200, 300) foo2[[2]] <- c(110, 210, 310) foo3 <- list() foo3[[1]] <- c(1000, 2000, 3000) foo3[[2]] <- c(1100, 2100, 3100) list(foo1,foo2,foo3) The result: > list(foo1,foo2,foo3) [[1]]

(I'm not sure if this is a request for a feature, or another instance where a feature has eluded me for many years.) Often I have a function which calls other functions, and may often use the default arguments to those functions, but needs the capability to pass along non-default choices. I usually do this with some variation on foo <- function(x, foo2Args=NULL or a list(foo2defaults),

Hi to all Authors@R: c(person("fooa","foob", role = c("aut","cre"), email = "fooa.foob@fooc.de"), person("foo1","foo2", role = c("ctb"), email = "foo1.foo2@foo3.de")) Author: fooa foob, with contributions from foo1 foo2 using r CMD check --as-cran .. (R 3.1

Hi the list In the DESCRIPTION file of my package foo0, I have: Depends: foo1 Imports: foo2 Suggest: foo3 Enhence: foo4 If I understand correctly, to install foo0 on my computer, I need to already have foo1, foo2, foo3. foo4 is not necessary. I my R sesssion, when I will write: library(foo0), then the package foo1 will be attach. foo2, foo3 and foo4 will not. Is that correct? But what is

Hi I have within a quite big function foo1, an internal function foo2. Now, in order to have a cleaner code, I wish to have the internal foo2 as "external". This foo2 was using arguments within the foo1 environment that were not declared as inputs of foo2, which works as long as foo2 is within foo1, but not anymore if foo2 is external, as is the case now. Now, I could add all those

Hi, I am applying the following code to map pca loadings onto a 3d grid, my problem is this - the output only plots the spheres in the requested color (in this case "red") for the first argument. The sphere from the second argument appear as flat dark circles. Also the text3d() command only seems to work for a couple of the positions, with no text added in most cases. Could anyone offer

My apologies for asking what is doubtless a dumb question, but I have scant experience in R. It would be very convenient in doing lots of plots to be able to do them in a loop that stepped through a vector of variable names. For example one could say x<-("mydates") y<-c("foo1","foo2","foo3") #where "foon" were vectors

Dear R developers, Taking advantage of the yesterday discussion about the use of Depends/Import/Suggests/Enhances, I would like to add a related question. Let's assume, in the DESCRIPTION file of my package foo0, I have: Depends: foo1 Imports: foo2 while in the NAMESPACE file of my package I have importFrom("foo2", f2) and within my package I use the following two external

Hi all, Working with S4 object, I definine two class foo1 and foo2. I define '[' (resp. '[<-') for the two classes. Then I define a third class foo3 that inherit from both foo1 and foo2. Is there a way to make '[' (resp. '[<-') for foo3 inherit from '[' (resp. '[<-') for foo1 and foo2? Thanks Christophe

Hello, This is my first post to the help request list, so I'm going to err on the side of giving too much information. I'm working on writing a simulation in which agents will make repeated production and exchange decisions with randomly chosen partners. The idea is, all agents can produce two goods which they want to consume, they choose a value t in [0,10] which sets their production

Let's say I have, for some reason, a bunch of scalars (i.e. single-valued variables) and I want to merge them all into a single vector of values. Can someone recommend a better function, or simpler way, to do so than the following? Suppose my scalars' names are foo1, foo2, foo3, foo1high, foo2high, foo3lo2, etc. Then I can do: >ls(pat='foo')->thels

Hi! I wonder if llvm::APFloat::toString() can be const since it should not modify the APFloat. -Jochen

Hi everyone, Hi ggplot users in particular, ggplot makes it very easy to plot things given their names when you use it interactively (and therefore can provide the names of the columns). qplot(x,foo,data=A) where A has columns (x,y,foo,bar) for example but I would like to use this from inside a function to which the name of the column is given. I cannot find an elegant way to make this

Hi, I have several data structures (xts structures). I then have a list of the names of those objects. I'd like to access the object by name. For example: foo1 <- as.xts(....) foo2 <- as.xts(...) foo3 <- as.xts(...) structs <- c("foo1", "foo2", "foo3") for (thisOne in structs){ print(thisOne$colA) } The above fails. Clearly I'm missing a

Hello, and sorry if this is already explained somewhere. I couldn't find anything. R (2.3.1, Windows) seems to perform some kind of lazy evaluation when evaluating defaults in function calls that, at least for me, leads to unexpected results. Consider the following, seemingly equivalent functions: > foo1 <- function(x, y=x) { + x <- 0 + y + } > foo1(1) [1] 0 > foo2

Hi Folks, I'm trying out some ideas for loadbalancing Samba servers with some replication underneath. Right now, we're trying to use DNS round robin, just to see if it works, but it isn't. Our basic config is that we have the same share and NMB server name on every node. Each node has a different IP hostname, which are all round-robin'ed to a single hostname. When we try to

Let's suppose I have userids and associated attributes... columns a and b a <- c(1,1,1,2,2,3,3,3,3) b <- c("a","b","c","a","d","a", "b", "e", "f") so a unique list of a would be id <- unique(a) I want a matrix like this... [,1] [,2] [,3] [1,] 3 1 2 [2,] 1 2 1 [3,]