similar to: Section 7.1 HML documentation (PR#8484)

Full_Name: Greg Kochanski Version: 2.2.0 OS: Debian Linux on i686 Submission from: (NULL) (212.159.16.190) Debian packages the R documentation separately from the R core code. Consequently, it is possible for people to have R without the HTML documentation. (In fact, the docs are not installed by default, so it's very likely.) Thus, help.start() cannot depend on the HTML documentation

Full_Name: Greg Kochanski Version: 2.2.1 OS: Debian Linux (testing) Submission from: (NULL) (212.159.16.190) This is really a feature request. When you do mosaicplot() on a data set where the probability of several nearby rows is small, then the labels for those rows are plotted overlapping each other. This situation can be improved by calling mosaicplot() with a large value of

Full_Name: Greg Kochanski Version: 2.2.1 OS: Debian Linux (testing) Submission from: (NULL) (212.159.16.190) mosaicplot(x, shade=TRUE) is intended to color the blocks blue if they are more common than one might expect and red if they are rarer than one might expect. Unfortunately, if a block is much rarer than expected, it is so narrow that one cannot see the red. Thus, a casual inspection

Full_Name: Greg Kochanski Version: 2.2.0 OS: Debian Linux Submission from: (NULL) (212.159.16.190) When you grab the corner of the Tk-R (R's console) window, the window stretches, but the useable area does not. It remains firmly fixed at the (rather small) value of 24 lines. In fact, you end up with a grey border of wasted pixels around the active white area that contains the text. (And,

This portion of the RFC is gramatically incorrect and confusing: The RTP payload MUST be padded to provide an integer number of octets as the payload length. These padding bits MUST be all zero. This padding is only required for the last frame in the packet, and only to ensure the packet contents ends on an octet boundary. <p> -- Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>

I''m using Rails Recipes to create a login form but instead of username and password, my setup is firstname, lastname, password. I seemed to be gramatically challenged and not sure how to set up the parameter list. Can anyone offer up a suggestion. The book shows the method starting like: if request.post? user = User.find(:first, :conditions => [''username = ?'' ,

I am trying to work through the usage of thinlto for distributed builds. Here is the simple thinlto usage, just add -flto=thin everywhere, easy: clang++ -flto=thin -O3 -c -o CreateWay_.o -DSPEC_CPU -DNDEBUG -DSPEC_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN -Wno-dangling-else CreateWay_.cpp clang++ -flto=thin -O3 -c -o Places_.o -DSPEC_CPU -DNDEBUG -DSPEC_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com > wrote: > Hi Sean, > > Sean Silva wrote: > > > > But asan won't catch problems (insofar I understand how it works) if > > the free'ed BasicBlock is used as a key in a DenseMap or something -- > > if another BasicBlock gets allocated to the same location

Thanks Teresa Yes it is astar, happen to send a tar of the sources but they are just copies from the spec distribution The ld command is: GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.29.1 Thanks for the guidance on path names. The prefix-replace just effects the string written to the object files right? So we could post-process that file with other tools as well, correct? Thanks again --david From: Teresa Johnson

Fails with gold too: Library-native.o:Library.cpp:regway: error: undefined reference to 'vtable for regwayobj' /home/dcallahan/fbsource/fbcode/third-party-buck/platform007/tools/binutils/bin/gold/ld: the vtable symbol may be undefined because the class is missing its key function clang-8: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) From: Teresa Johnson

While building test-suite with the new PM, I ran into problems with AssertingVH being triggered which is obvious in retrospect: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28400 Both cases I ran into revolve around LVI which holds AssertingVH. Essentially, what happens is this: 1. LVI holds an AssertingVH pointing at a BasicBlock 2. Some other pass ends up deleting that BB (e.g. SimplifyCFG) 3. BOOM

Hi, Commit 63753b3e0dc56efb1acf94fa46f3fee7bc59281c x86: allow VCPUOP_register_vcpu_info to work again on PVHVM guests Leaves HVM guests dangling after shutdown or destroy: xl list gives: (null) 16 0 4 --p--d 11.5 (null) 17 0 1 --ps-d 12.0 (first was destroyed, second shutdown) The

I have updated one of my S4 DCs to 4.5.5, somewhat excited about the line in the ChangeLog * Bug #12600 - dbcheck does not find or fix dangling links on live objects Do I misunderstand the scope of this bug? # samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix --reset-well-known-acls ... ERROR: no target object found for GUID component for member in object CN=Domain Users,CN=Users,XXXXX -

Hi, dbcheck tells us we have two "dangling forward links" that I am trying to get rid of. On my test domain, I have simply done ldbedit -e nano -H ./CN=CONFIGURATION,DC=SAMBA,DC=COMPANY,DC=COM to remove them. While that seems to have worked nicely, dbcheck report zero errors now, it is something that I should never have done, or do in production, according to Andrew: "We

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > Hi Sean, > > Sean Silva wrote: > > While building test-suite with the new PM, I ran into problems with > > AssertingVH being triggered which is obvious in retrospect: > > https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28400 > > > > Both cases I ran into revolve around LVI

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=970 Summary: document -- as option/non-option separator Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All URL: http://bugs.debian.org/289401 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Documentation

On 10/16/2017 11:13 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 16:53:17 +0200 > mj via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> dbcheck tells us we have two "dangling forward links" that I am >> trying to get rid of. On my test domain, I have simply done >> >> ldbedit -e nano -H

On 02/10/2019 14:42, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: > Mandi! Rowland penny via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > >>> samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix >>> Yes, should be possible, but i normaly do that after i do the following. >> Yes, but why wasn't it removed in the first place ? > [...] >>> Run : >>> dig CNAME

Hi Johannes, > Now that reasoning works from a conceptual standpoint only for > non-inbounds GEPs, I think. From a practical standpoint my above > description will probably make sure everything works out just fine (see > also my rephrased answer down below!). I say this because I think the > following lang-ref passage makes sure everything, not only memory > accesses, involving

On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 12:23 +0000, Chris Alavoine via samba wrote: > Hi all, > > I've now upgraded to Samba-4.5.2 and I've tried running: > > samba-tool domain tombstones expunge > > but I simpley get: > > Removed 0 objects and 0 links successfully, however I'm still seeing > several hundred errors when running a dbcheck with the "not remocing