similar to: minor build problem

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "minor build problem"

2003 Aug 20
1
Error code 1 during 'make install'(FreeBSD 4.6.2)
Hello, When doing "make install" under any port, I get *** Error code 1 after the "Checking if *** already installed" (see below for help2man as an example). This error seems to occur with any port, such as apg (/usr/ports/security/apg). The tarball are fetched from Internet. I think this is due to the difference of version : CVS has RELENG_4_6_2 and 'make
2006 Nov 09
1
Failing to install R-2.4.0 on FC4
Hi everyone, Firstly, I'm sorry for the cross-post. I re-read the posting guide and it appears my question is more related to r-devel.... (i think :-) ) I downloaded the source code available at: http://cran.fhcrc.org/src/base/R-2/R-2.4.0.tar.gz to a linux machine (Linux 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4smp #1 SMP). I successfully configured and compiled it, which means I'm able to run it from the
2019 Aug 08
1
Appetite for eliminating dependency on Perl
Preamble: I am in no way opposed to Perl in general - I love Perl and probably always will. R currently has Perl as both a build-time and run-time dependency. This adds about 200 Mb, give or take, to the required environment size (as measured in CentOS - looks like it might be a bit smaller in Ubuntu?). Not such a huge deal, really, but the actual benefit R gets from the dependency is quite
2009 May 22
2
Step by step: Making an R package with Fortran 95
To all. I need your help. The big question is: How do I make an R library with Fortran 95 files? You may assume that I am a pretty decent programmer in both R and Fortran. I lay out a scenario and need your help! I know how to make an ordinary R package and have dabbled with R + Fortran 95 *.dll linking. I do not have a great handle on the whole Makevars file and whatever else I might need
2006 Mar 30
2
hello
hello everybody! my name is sly and i''m new to the group and also to ruby. i decided i to learn ruby on rails a while ago but only today i sat down with the book and started. so i installed it on my linux laptop and i tried the "hello" program. and i failed. i can''t see anything in the browser page. i searched the net and list and... any idea where i can find some
2006 Jul 19
3
error when compiling "stats" library in R-2.3.1 on Solaris x86
Hello, I tried to compile v2.3.1 on Solaris x86 with SUN Pro compilers. I had an error while stats libarary was being compiled and I notice that "-xtarget=generic64" was not passed to f95 while cc used it. Could you tell me how to fix this problem? f95 -PIC -O -I/mounts/devel/SUNWspro/prod/include -c sgram.f -o sgram.o f95 -PIC -O -I/mounts/devel/SUNWspro/prod/include -c
2006 Aug 31
2
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
On 30 Aug 2006, at 23:04, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: >>> I use NAG with llvm-gcc4. What sort of errors do you get? Did >>> you configure llvm-test with the appropriate flags to find it? >> Yes, I did. llvm-test is configured as follows: (in /work/LLVM/ >> 1.8/ llvm/project/llvm-test): >> ./configure
2006 Apr 11
1
Bug#361968: Wrong name in manpage
Kanru, Thanks for the bugreport. On 11 April 2006 at 22:03, Kanru Chen wrote: | Package: r-base-core | Version: 2.2.1.svn37668-1 | Severity: minor | | In manpage of /usr/bin/R, the first, fourth and last line shows `VERSION' | instead of `R'. | | I believe it is a typo. More likely something is wrong with how R.1 is autogenerated using help2man. Incidentally, that `R --version'
2004 Nov 11
1
R with Sun Studio Fortran 95 compiler
Hi, I am trying to compile R 1.9.1 and 2.0.0 on Solaris 2.8 with Sun Studio Fortran 95 compiler but I have obtained some errors which I enclose. I have compiled R with g77 GNU compiler and it was OK. Does anyone know if R 2.0.0 has been successfully built on Solaris 2.8 with Sun Studio Fortran 95 compiler? or at least, How could I achieve this? The R installation manual does not have any
2006 Aug 31
0
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: >> $ grep F95 .../projects/llvm-test/Makefile.config > > -bash-3.00$ grep F95 projects/llvm-test/Makefile.config > # F95: Enable LLVM to run Fortran benchmarks without a Fortran front-end > USE_F95=1 > F95_DIR := > F95 := /work/NAG_f95/bin/f95 > F95_INC := /work/NAG_f95/lib > F95_LIB := /work/NAG_f95/lib > > Looks
2006 Sep 01
0
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
On 01 Sep 2006, at 10:05, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > >> >>> Also, it is possible to tell make only to compile benchmark X? How >>> can I >>> enforce this? >> >> Go into the directory for that benchmark, then run 'make' or >> whatever. > I tried tom compile each of the SPEC CPU2000 benchmarks using the make command is each respective
2006 Nov 25
0
[LLVMdev] f95 problem with SPEC2K
On 25 Nov 2006, at 09:02, Reid Spencer wrote: > Anyone know what to do about this: > > make[4]: Leaving directory `/proj/llvm/llvm-test-1/External/SPEC/ > CFP2000/173.applu' > make[4]: Entering directory `/proj/llvm/llvm-test-1/External/SPEC/ > CFP2000/178.galgel' > /usr/bin/f95 -w -S -O2 /opt/spec/CPU2000v1.3.1/benchspec// > CFP2000/178.galgel/src/modules.f90
2008 Oct 31
3
[LLVMdev] gfortran link failure in current llvm svn
On Oct 30, 2008, at 11:02 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Oct 30, 2008, at 5:23 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> ps We do have one oddity left in llvm-gfortran from current llvm >> svn. I find everytime I compile something with llvm-gfortran that >> I get a series of warning messages... >> >> f951: warning: command line option "-Wformat" is valid for C/C++/
2010 Apr 13
2
.Fortran interface error
Hi all, I'm preparing a package which uses .Fortran to interface a Fortran 95 function. This F95 function simply receives the name of a file from R, opens this file and forwards its content to a F95 module, which, in turn, makes the real computation. The F95 module is a pre-existing one and I'm trying to use it in its actual state. Thus, data transfer between R and this F95 module is
2006 Nov 25
1
[LLVMdev] f95 problem with SPEC2K
Hi Kenneth, On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 10:12 +0100, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > > > > ? > > > > This man page: > > http://www.die.net/doc/linux/man/man1/gfortran.1.html > > > > says there's no such option as -kind > > > > Do I need some special version of f95 to run the SPEC2K tests? > > If I'm correct, f95 has nothing to do with GCC. As
2006 Sep 01
2
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
On 31 Aug 2006, at 23:46, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: >> Bummer. I think I'll contact the NAG support for more info on >> this. Can you >> show me the content of your Makefile.nagfortran? > > It is identical to yours. > >> Also, it is possible to tell make only to compile benchmark X? How >> can I >>
2006 Nov 25
2
[LLVMdev] f95 problem with SPEC2K
Anyone know what to do about this: make[4]: Leaving directory `/proj/llvm/llvm-test-1/External/SPEC/CFP2000/173.applu' make[4]: Entering directory `/proj/llvm/llvm-test-1/External/SPEC/CFP2000/178.galgel' /usr/bin/f95 -w -S -O2 /opt/spec/CPU2000v1.3.1/benchspec//CFP2000/178.galgel/src/modules.f90 -o modules.c -fixed -kind=byte -dcfuns -dusty f95: unrecognized option '-kind=byte'
2015 Aug 30
3
Compilation error with MinGW
I use the one from mingw.org, installed by the recommended way with mingw-get-setup.exe. Sly. On 30.08.2015 06:10, Yaron Keren wrote: > Which mingw distribution exactly do you use? > > 2015-08-30 0:46 GMT+03:00 Slycelote via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm hitting the same problem as in this[1] thread. I use release_37
2006 Sep 01
2
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
Hello, Some problems were solved, new ones arised... Getting closer though... The fixes for the previous problems are at the bottom of this email, bug reports will be submitted when all problems are solved. +++ New/remaining problems +++ Currently, 9/26 benchmarks compile and run succesfully. One (fma3d) still has a f95 related problem (see below). The other 16 are divided into two groups:
2006 Aug 30
0
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: >> I use NAG with llvm-gcc4. What sort of errors do you get? Did you >> configure llvm-test with the appropriate flags to find it? > Yes, I did. llvm-test is configured as follows: (in /work/LLVM/1.8/ > llvm/project/llvm-test): > ./configure --with-spec2000=/work/SPEC_CPU2000_1.3_src/benchspec -- > without-f2c