similar to: bizarre signif stars in Sweave latex

Just built 3.6.3 from source and tcl doesn't work. Worked fine with the same laptop in 3.6.2. Here's the exact error. blurfle$ R --vanilla R version 3.6.3 (2020-02-29) -- "Holding the Windsock" Copyright (C) 2020 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit) R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. You are welcome to

I knew I could work around. But this shouldn't happen. And yes. Same problem with your example. blurfle$ R --vanilla R version 3.6.3 (2020-02-29) -- "Holding the Windsock" Copyright (C) 2020 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit) R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. You are welcome to redistribute it under certain

Full_Name: Charles J. Geyer Version: 1.8.0 OS: i686-pc-linux-gnu (Suse 8.2) Submission from: (NULL) (134.84.86.22) Two bugs (perhaps related, perhaps independent) revealed by the same Poisson regression with offset mydata <- read.table(url("http://www.stat.umn.edu/geyer/5931/mle/seeds.txt")) out.fubar <- glm(seedlings ~ burn01 + vegtype * burn02 + offset(log(totalseeds)),

Sorry if I was supposed to file a bug report, but I don't know whether we're supposed to do that on R devel. I just built R devel from source (2010-06-15 r52280) and tried to check a package with it and Sweave failed on the vignette. It puts the line \usepackage{/HOME/faculty/charlie/local/devel/lib64/R/share/texmf/Sweave} in the *.tex file but, that's not where Sweave.sty is oak$

>>>>> Charles Geyer writes: > In that case, perhaps the question could be changed to could CC0 be > added to the list of R licences. Right now the only CC licence that > is in the R licenses is CC-BY-SA-4.0. Hmm, I see Name: CC0 FSF: free_and_GPLv3_compatible (https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#CC0) OSI: NA (https://opensource.org/faq#cc-zero) URL:

The subject line says it all. How can I find what Error: cannot set length of non-vector means? RTFS is no help. I can find out of course that it comes from "lengthgets", but who called that? Not me! The situation is as follows. I am trying to get a package ready for CRAN. Every time I run "R CMD check" I get this error when building the package vignette. But (!)

is it possible to set an option inside a function ((I want to set na.action = na.fail) and have the previous state restored if there is an error so that the function doesn't change the option behind the user's back? Sorry if this has been answered before, but this subject is hard to Google. -- Charles Geyer Professor, School of Statistics University of Minnesota charlie at stat.umn.edu

This is just to alert the list about a new technical report http://www.stat.umn.edu/geyer/gdor/ that shows how to determine, using exact infinite-precision rational arithmetic when the MLE exists in a GLM (or for that matter in any exponential family, such as aster models -- contributed package aster) and what to do when it does not. This suggests many changes to glm, glm.fit, predict.glm,

I would like the unlicense (http://unlicense.org/) added to R licenses. Does anyone else think that worthwhile? -- Charles Geyer Professor, School of Statistics Resident Fellow, Minnesota Center for Philosophy of Science University of Minnesota charlie at stat.umn.edu

I have a design problem. I'm trying to design a package that does something like glm, but 1. the response is multivariate, so I can't be just like glm and get the response variables out of the formula. I decided (perhaps incorrectly) to just supply the response variable names as an argument "response". 2. I have the usual predictor variables. 3. I

Here's a simpler example that should reproduce that error for you: ans <- utils::select.list(c("hello", "world", "again"), graphics=TRUE) Does it? FYI, I installed R 3.6.3 from source on CentOS 7 a few hours ago, and for me the above works just fine. For your immediate needs of selecting a CRAN mirror, you can set: options(menu.graphics = FALSE) as a

The note to 1004 says "fixed for 1.3.1" Uh. No. It ain't. The problem was more serious than guessed as even the simplest testing would show. For example, Example 5.4 in Hollander and Wolfe (Nonparametric Statistical, Methods, 2nd ed., Wiley, 1999, pp. 180-181) R Version 1.3.1 (SuSE Linux 7.1) > X <-

Can anyone tell me if the following C code (which proved very useful when using the snow package -- use it to nice slaves) compiles and dyn.loads under Windoze or Mac? It is (apparently) POSIX, so I suppose it is fine in OS X, but does Windoze's advertized POSIX compliance mean anything here? If it doesn't work on some platform, how do I deal with that? I want to submit as contributed

Hi, has anyonne experienced problems between the LaTeX beamer class and Sweave? The following code does not work properly: ################################# \documentclass{beamer} \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{ngerman} \begin{document} \frame{ \frametitle{test} test <<>>= 1+1 @ } \end{document} ################################# Below is the

R CMD check --use-valgrind <packagename> used to run valgrind on the tests in the tests directory of the package. But it seems to have stopped. R-2.9.1 doesn't -- at least on my box -- and neither does R-2.10.0 (devel). I am not sure when this stopped. I think 2.8.x did this. The only old R I have around is 2.6.0 and it certainly does. R CMD check --help for 2.9.1 says (among other

Today's GNU R tutorial in http://how-to.linuxcareer.com/a-quick-gnu-r-tutorial-to-statistical-models-and-graphics points out how bad statistical practice is being further perpetuated, by virtue of "significance stars" still being the default in printed output from lm models. ----- Frank Harrell Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University -- View this message in context:

Dear All, Apologies for not providing a reproducible example, but if I could, then I would be able to answer myself my question. Essentially, I am trying to fit a very complicated custom probability distribution to some data. Fitdistrplus does in principle everything which I need, but if require me to specify not only the density function d, but also the cumulative p and and inverse cumulative

I think I am using objects according to the man page. This seems to be a valid regular expression. But whether I know what I'm doing or no, it still shouldn't be doing what valgrind seems to be saying it's doing. (IMHO) ---------- start of script ---------- Script started on Mon 01 Aug 2005 02:09:00 PM PDT linux$ printenv VALGRIND_OPTS --tool=3Dmemcheck linux$ cat bar.R foo <- 1

The functions metrop and temper in the mcmc package have a debug = FALSE argument that when TRUE adds a lot of debugging information to the returned list. This is absolutely necessary to test the functions, because one generally knows nothing about the simulated distribution except what what one learns from MCMC samples. Hence you must expose all details of the simulation to have any hope of

The point estimates produced by wilcox.test are perverse (not wrong, just brain damaged). The Hodges-Lehmann estimator that goes with the signed rank test is the median of the Walsh averages. The Hodges-Lehmann estimator that goes with the rank sum test is the median of the pairwise differences. wilcox.test agrees except that it uses the following very peculiar definition of "sample