similar to: R CMD check on Win fails to detect failed installations (PR#6790)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "R CMD check on Win fails to detect failed installations (PR#6790)"

2004 Apr 15
1
R CMD check on Win fails to detect failed installations (PR#6768)
I just post it not to forget - will try to contribute a fix. Example: CDNmoney_2003.9-2.tar.gz (in the archives section of CRAN) [There is another problem here I'll address separately.] If running solely, R CMD check CDNmoney fails to detect a failed installation on Windows. Instead, it reports: * checking whether package 'CDNmoney' can be installed ... OK Of course, the check
2005 Oct 05
0
Ad: Re: Ad: Re: R crashes for large formulas in lm() (PR#8181)
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 Hallgeir.Grinde at elkem.no wrote: > Yes. > so (x1*x2*x3*x4*x5*x6*x7*x8)^2 = (x1+x2+x3+x4+x5+x6+x7+x8)^8 ? Yes in the sense that the simplified formula given by terms() is the same. > and there is a difference in > (x1*x2*x3*x4*x5*x6*x7*x8)^2 > and > (x1*x2*x3*x4*x5*x6*x7*x8) > althoug the resulting formulas are the same, or? The first is reduced to the
2005 Oct 05
0
Ad: Re: Ad: Re: R crashes for large formulas in lm() (PR#8180)
Dette er en melding med flere deler i MIME-format. --=_alternative 004C4E4A00257091_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Yes. so (x1*x2*x3*x4*x5*x6*x7*x8)^2 = (x1+x2+x3+x4+x5+x6+x7+x8)^8 ? and there is a difference in (x1*x2*x3*x4*x5*x6*x7*x8)^2 and (x1*x2*x3*x4*x5*x6*x7*x8) althoug the resulting formulas are the same, or? This fikses my problem, but R still crashes for the
2003 Jun 12
0
Re: (PR#3241) write.table() fails for POSIXlt class and NAs in
Uwe, You said you used testdata <- data.frame(date = strptime(c("31121991", "31121991"), "%d%m%Y"), nothing = c(NA, NA)) but that's not the same object, and that one does work for me. > dput(testdata) structure(list(date = structure(c(694137600, 694137600), class = c("POSIXt", "POSIXct")), nothing = c(NA, NA)),
2005 Oct 05
0
Ad: Re: R crashes for large formulas in lm() (PR#8180)
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 Hallgeir.Grinde at elkem.no wrote: > And some more informastion I forgot. > R does not crash if I write out the formula: > > set.seed(123) > x1 <- runif(1000) > x2 <- runif(1000) > x3 <- runif(1000) > x4 <- runif(1000) > x5 <- runif(1000) > x6 <- runif(1000) > x7 <- runif(1000) > x8 <- runif(1000) > y <-
2004 Oct 19
0
Question on Rprof(); was: Re: sapply and loop
Yes. It should have something to do with read/write permissions, but it is not clear how it happens. I can write file to C drive using R. I usually write my results matrix to a txt file in C drive. For Rprof(), the boot.out file can be created, but only with one line sample.interval=20000 The situation is the same even if I specify the directory to the D drive,where I have the full
2007 Oct 02
0
patch: allow R CMD build exclude patterns to match symlinks
The following is a patch (svn diff) for the R CMD build script that calculates exclude patterns after the tar/untar step rather than before. The perl find() function, used in the calculation of the exclude patterns, ignores symlinks, which meant that directory symlinks were not considered for exclusion. Since the tar/untar step resolves (copies) symlinks, this works around that limitation.
2001 May 31
0
Re: R-WinEdt (PR#959)
On Thu, 31 May 2001 ligges@statistik.uni-dortmund.de wrote: > John Maindonald wrote: > > > > Hello Uwe - > > I have been making some use of R-WinEdt. I have just installed > > version 1.3. For the most part it works fine. An annoyance is > > however that when I type in data(), Windows comes up with an error > > message such as > > > > File
2012 Jul 17
0
R CMD build/check on Windows 7 -- Please ignore
I will repost on R-devel. -- Bert On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Prof Brian Ripley <ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk>wrote: > On 17/07/2012 18:20, Bert Gunter wrote: > >> Folks: >> >> sessionInfo() >> R version 2.15.0 (2012-03-30) >> Platform: i386-pc-mingw32/i386 (32-bit) >> >> locale: >> [1] LC_COLLATE=English_United States.1252 >> [2]
2007 Aug 21
2
Partial comparison in string vector
Hi list members I have a vector of strings x=c("w","ex","ee") And I want to get a logical vector showing the positions where my search string "e" matches the elements partially, i.e. is at least the left-hand part of the target strings, i.e. I want to get a vector FALSE TRUE TRUE. Any ideas? Thanks Steve Powell proMENTE social research research |
2003 Jun 27
1
R-help Digest, Vol 4, Issue 27 ( -Reply)
Hi, I am out of town and will get back to you on the 13th of July. Leo >>> "r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch" 06/27/03 00:32 >>> Send R-help mailing list submissions to r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help or, via email, send a message with subject or body
2001 Apr 12
2
Re: stop() and Rcmd (PR#910)
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > On Thu, 12 Apr 2001 ligges@statistik.uni-dortmund.de wrote: > > > "Rcmd check" on NT does not catch errors generated by stop() in files > > in the tests directory. Thus the fact that all the tests complete does > > not mean they completed succesfully. In my experiments it *does* put out an error but continues.
2005 Dec 05
0
???UNSURE??? Re: (PR#8363) R CMD INSTALL fails if cd prints
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Philip Lijnzaad wrote: > On Friday 02 December 2005 18:20, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > >> What shells are these? > > Bash, mostly, but also ksh and zsh; sorry for not mentioning this. I still don't know what you did to be able to reproduce this (and I did ask). And as it is a shell script running under /bin/sh, it must be whatever is masquerading as
2002 Aug 14
1
FW: R CMD check: Too long [R] code line generated (PR#1900)
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: > Sorry, but it was indeed the redirection of the standard output in > Cygwin/bash that cause the first problem, not R (I should stop doing > troubleshooting at 1:00 AM). So please forget about the problems reported in > R_CMD_check.out. However, it would still be nice if you still update R CMD > check to do join with "\n".
2004 Apr 15
1
R INSTALL resumes on Win in case of errors (PR#6769)
I just post it not to forget - will try to contribute a fix. Example: SparseM_0.34.tar.gz Running R INSTALL SparseM gives an error ("Execution halted"), but resumes the rest of the installation procedure and prints "* DONE" at the end. Hence R CMD check (either running solely or in maintainer's mode) cannot detect that the installation fails. Output: [SNIP ...]
2008 May 19
0
(PR#11484) On WinXP, R CMD config needs sh (and breaks
Where is the bug here? It also does on a Unix-alike. Anything involving R CMD potentially needs the Rtools set in the path. R CMD config is primarily intended to be used in configure scripts in packages. On Sun, 18 May 2008, lgautier at gmail.com wrote: > Full_Name: Laurent Gautier > Version: R-2.7.0patched (r45712) > OS: WinXP > Submission from: (NULL) (90.15.141.247) >
2005 Nov 24
1
Windows R CMD build <pkg> leftovers
A command R CMD build <pkg> that fails, e.g., because of C code compilation errors, leaves a directory %TMPDIR%/Rinst.xxx containing the file R.css. Although R CMD INSTALL --build cleans up after itself, build does not. A fix is below. Also, build.in references Rcmd.exe, which I thought was no longer necessary? Index: build.in
2008 May 19
1
(PR#11484) On WinXP, R CMD config needs sh (and breaks without it)
2008/5/19 Prof Brian Ripley <ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk>: > Where is the bug here? It also does on a Unix-alike. Then "R CMD config --help" could at least spit out an error stating what should be installed (rather than die with an execution error straight from the DOS). Setting an "sh" in the %Path% (sh coming from cygwin) does not seem to lead to something working
2003 Oct 20
0
Re: win.metafiles in linux and R
Dear all: Professor Ripley commented: > Note that libEMF's help page says > > It is also possible now to generate EMF files from PSTOEDIT > on POSIX > systems. Therefore, if your graphics code only outputs > PostScript, you > can now easily convert it to EMF. > > but that is only true on Windows (unfortunately). > Actually I have had some luck
2009 Mar 05
0
(PR#13553) wishlist boxplot
No objections from Martin or elsewhere, so I have now committed this. Thanks, Uwe. On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Uwe Ligges wrote: > [CCing Martin and Brian who had both done most svn commits of boxplot.R so > far] > > > A very minor wishlist item that I should have already reported years ago: > > All the time when I need presentation/publication quality boxplots, I add >