similar to: Rdconv Rd->Ssgm doesn't convert aliases (PR#4838)

I'm trying: R CMD Rdconv file.Rd --type=Ssgm If file.Rd contains \code{x} then this is currently translated as <s-expression>x</s-expression> I suggest instead translating to <code>x</code> (provided that R CMD Sd2Rd is changed to support the <code> tag; I just submitted that bug separately). Note that this is an enhancement, not a bug. This change would

If an Rd file has only one keyword entry then the Splus sgm file made with Rdconv --type=SSgm has no keyword entries. To reproduce: Use prompt() to make a skeleton help file R> f<-function(x)log(1+x)-log1p(x) R> prompt(f) Created file named 'f.Rd'. Edit the file and move it to the appropriate directory. R> q() It has 2 \keyword entries in it

I'm using R 2.2.0 on Windows. Doing some conversions of help files. Internal comments indicate that the Sd2Rd conversion is "Converted by Sd2Rd version 1.21." I'm converting .d -> .Rd .sgml -> .Rd using Sd2Rd, then checking by using Rdconv to convert .Rd back to .d or .sgml. Here are errors in some of the conversions. The most significant errors are in .Rd to .sgml.

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 bill at insightful.com wrote: > On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 timh at insightful.com wrote: > > > I've created a .Rd file (below), then converted that to .sgml using > > R CMD Rdconv --type=Ssgm combn.Rd > combn.sgml > > The output (shown below) is missing some of the sections: > > arguments > > seealso > > examples > > If

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 timh at insightful.com wrote: > I've created a .Rd file (below), then converted that to .sgml using > R CMD Rdconv --type=Ssgm combn.Rd > combn.sgml > The output (shown below) is missing some of the sections: > arguments > seealso > examples > If instead I convert to .d (below), the same sections are missing, > and the "note"

Hi, When writing formulae in Rd files I use \leq to get a less-than-or-equal-to sign, as this is what the LaTeX references I consulted suggested. This works correctly for the PDF output (Rcmd Rd2dvi.sh --pdf), however when the Rd file is converted to text or html this command is converted to "<=q". A workaround is to use \le instead of \leq which works with my LaTeX distribution

Ny understanding was that Insightful had been asked to provide patches fo this. We look forward to receiving them. On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, timh at insightful.com wrote: > I've created a .Rd file (below), then converted that to .sgml using > R CMD Rdconv --type=Ssgm combn.Rd > combn.sgml > The output (shown below) is missing some of the sections: > arguments > seealso

I've created a .Rd file (below), then converted that to .sgml using R CMD Rdconv --type=Ssgm combn.Rd > combn.sgml The output (shown below) is missing some of the sections: arguments seealso examples If instead I convert to .d (below), the same sections are missing, and the "note" section is included but without the necessary newline.

I have help files in several formats. Up until now I have converted nroff files to S-Plus 6 sgml and html files using Splus doc_to_S ... (creates .sgml file) Splus HINSTALL ... (creates .sgm and .html files) I maintain master help files in R .Rd files, and for some of my functions converting from .Rd to .sgm using R CMD Rdconv --type=Ssgm ... produces better .sgm files than beginning with

When I installed R 1.2.2 on a Sparc 20 running Solaris 2.5.1 and when I install a package, I get the messages: Bare word found where operator expected at /usr/local/lib/R/share/perl/R/Rdconv.pm line 1390, near "$txtout mywrap" (Missing operator before mywrap?) Bare word found where operator expected at /usr/local/lib/R/share/perl/R/Rdconv.pm line 1405, near "$txtout

Full_Name: Henrik Bengtsson Version: 1.3.1 OS: Sun Solaris 8 Submission from: (NULL) (130.235.3.49) I have been trying to install [R] v1.3.1 locally on a Sun Solaris 8 machine and I ran into the (already known) perl problems that express theselves as: Bare word found where operator expected at /usr/matcent/hb/R/R-1.3.1/share/perl/R/Rdconv.pm line 1390, near "$txtout mywrap"

Dear list, I've a package, myPkg, which was developed on R v 2.6.1. I have installed R v2.9.2 from source, with a shared library and tcktk support. The package, myPkg, depends on RSPerl, and imports it in its NAMESPACE. I've downloaded and installed RSPerl using command: >R CMD INSTALL -c --configure-args="--with-modules='IO \ Fcntl Socket Storable XML::Parser::Expat

Full_Name: David Firth Version: 1.8.0 OS: Mac OS 10.2.8 Submission from: (NULL) (80.177.12.48) In .Rd files, we use \url{stuff} to refer to a URL on the web. Just as the documentation says. Perhaps this isn't a bug, then, but certainly it's a trap for the unwary. If the construction \link{url{something}} appears in a .Rd file, then Rdconv --type=html ... gets stuck and appears

Hi all, I've inherited in-house development package, which was developed on R v 2.6.1. I'm trying upgrade to R v 2.9.1. I have installed R from source, with a shared library and tcktk support. When installing myPkg, I use the following command: >R CMD INSTALL myPkg * Installing to library ‘/usr/local/lib/R/library’ * Installing *source* package ‘myPkg’ ... ** R ** inst ** preparing

Full_Name: michael klinglemsith Version: R-1.7.1 OS: linux Submission from: (NULL) (134.134.136.4) I run: (note: ] is my unix prompt) ]./configure It seems to work, here are the messages I get from the end of configure: R is now configured for i686-pc-linux-gnu Source directory: . Installation directory: /usr/local C compiler: gcc -D__NO_MATH_INLINES

I have just compiled and installed R-patched on a Sparc 20 running Solaris 2.5.1. The compilation and installation went fine except for the message: Bare word found where operator expected at /usr/src/R/R-patched/share/perl/R/Rdconv.pm line 1491, near "$txtout txt_header" (Missing operator before txt_header?) I get similar messages for lines 1390, 1405, 1420, and 1448 in Rdconv.pm.

For the record (and as privately discussed with Brian Ripley), happens with all recent versions of R including R-devel from today: Consider a simple a.Rd file containing the lines ================== \name{a} \title{a} \value{\code{a} \code{\link[a]{a}} \pkg{a} \item{a}{a} } ================== with these lines, I get, e.g.: ================== R CMD Rdconv --type="txt" a.Rd a

>>>>> "Achim" == Achim Zeileis <zeileis@ci.tuwien.ac.at> writes: Achim> Just a small documentation bug: something went wrong Achim> for the description of the graphical parameter `las' Achim> on the HTML version of the `par' help page: `las' is Achim> missing and instead a line from the description is Achim> used.

Hi, I've written a package and converted my Rd files into LaTeX using Rdconv. When I copy and paste these files in to my Sweave document I get the?error message when compiling the Sweave file: ! Undefined control sequence. l.32 \inputencoding {utf8} I also get the error message for the "\HeaderA", "\keyword". Additionally I get an environment undefined

On 05/05/2009 5:04 AM, robin hankin wrote: > Hi Duncan > > I asked this question to R-devel, and there was no reply, so I thought > I'd ask you > directly. Any ideas? > > best wishes > > Robin > > > > > I am having difficulty including a LaTeX formula in an Rd > file. > > The example given in section 2.7 in 'Parsing Rd files'