similar to: Methods package is now attached by default

Hi all, I try to build R-1.7.0 + patches. when problem arise. I start with appling the patches and second configure and make. Any ideas whats wrong (wrong compiler wrong make version or missing an essential library...) /Ulf D heres the log: **** cut************ making method_meta_data.d from method_meta_data.c making slot.d from slot.c making class_support.d from class_support.c making tests.d

I am currently trying to install R 1.6.0 on an SGI Octane running: > uname -aR IRIX64 hcu091 6.5 6.5.9m 07201608 IP30 and I am receiving a fatal error during the make step. Any help in this matter would be greatly appreciated. Here is the final output from "./configure"... ---------- R is now configured for mips-sgi-irix6.5 Source directory: . Installation directory:

Hello everyone, I've just attempted to build R-1.4 on Compaq Tru64 (I'll enclose the text from bug.report() from R-1.3.1 at the end.) The relevant part of the log is below. Any ideas? gcc -shared -o methods.so do_substitute_direct.o methods_list_dispatch.o method_meta_data.o slot.o -L/usr/local/lib /usr/ucb/ld: Warning: Unresolved: TYPEOF Rf_error Rf_protect Rf_substitute

Hello ... With a new checkout of R-devel, I'm getting the following error on startup: Type 'demo()' for some demos, 'help()' for on-line help, or 'help.start()' for a HTML browser interface to help. Type 'q()' to quit R. Error in open.connection(con, "rb") : unable to open connection In addition: Warning message: cannot open compressed file

Dear R-help, Has anyone been able to compile R on Linux using Intel's C(++) and Fortran compilers? When I tried it (using R-devel from March 19), I get the following error when it gets to compiling the "methods" package. Can some one tells me where to start looking? What is "error 139"? Any help greatly appreciated! Cheers, Andy PS: This is on Mandrake 9.0, running

I am trying to install R onto an Altix system running SuSE Enterprise Linux 9 SP3 with SGI ProPack 4 SP3. I end up with this error no matter what I try. Any suggestions on how to proceed would be appreciated! ----- gcc -shared -L/opt/local/lib -o methods.so do_substitute_direct.o init.o methods_list_dispatch.o slot.o class_support.o tests.o ../../../../library/methods/libs/methods.so is

Dear all, To explain my problem I am attaching a demonstration package "myclasspkg": I have the following two S4 classes with similar inheritance: SubSubClassA <- SubClassB <- BaseClass SubSubClassB <- SubClassB <- BaseClass In R I am calling the following functions: > library(myclasspkg) > subA <-

Dear all, Maybe, I am doing something wrong, but using R-2.5.0 on my Intel-Mac, I have problems using function callNextMethod() in method initialize. I am loading the following code as file "testS4.R": setClass("baseClass", representation(myname = "character", mydir = "character", "VIRTUAL"),

--- On Thu, 3/9/09, Vinh Nguyen <vinhdizzo at gmail.com> wrote: > hi hin-tak, > > i'm trying to build r packages for windows on a > mac/linux. i guess > this used to possible and supported, but is no longer > supported. i > ran into this post of yours, > https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2009-July/053971.html, > and hope > u don't mind me

Dear all, Recently, there was a question to use the same method for more than one class: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2007-March/044809.html I have a variation of this question: Is it possible to use the same function name, e.g. "myfunction" in both, an S4 baseClass and derivedClass. The method "myfunction" in derivedCalss should extend the functionality defined

Am 30.06.2010 um 23:31 schrieb John Criswell: > > Stupid question: is making the getOperand() method of CallInst > going to work? For example, if I have the following code: > > void > method (Instruction * I) { > I->getOperand(2); > ... > } > > void method2 (CallInst * CI) { > method (CI); > ... > } > > Will method() still work

I have this config: # BL00070 - Disable NFS service {["nfs","nfslock","netfs","portmap"]: ensure => stopped, enable => false, } user {"rpc": ensure => absent, provider => "useradd" } user {"rpcuser": ensure => absent, provider => "useradd" } file

Gabor Greif wrote: > Am 30.06.2010 um 23:31 schrieb John Criswell: > > >> Stupid question: is making the getOperand() method of CallInst >> going to work? For example, if I have the following code: >> >> void >> method (Instruction * I) { >> I->getOperand(2); >> ... >> } >> >> void method2 (CallInst * CI) {

Hi, I would like to use std::shared_ptr in my pass. However I'm facing a problem wrt RTTI. If I have a code like: std::shared_ptr<BaseClass> x(new DerivedClass()); ... std::shared_ptr<DerivedClass> p = std::dynamic_pointer_cast<DerivedClass>(x); It does not compile since the default RTTI infrastructure is not used by LLVM. Also, it's not clear to me if the

hi, My code: data<-matrix(data=c(0.425,0.5,0.75,0.125,0.25,0.475,0.375,0.25,0.625,0.5,0.1,0.125,0,0.25,0.25),nrow=3,ncol=5,byrow=TRUE, dimnames=list(c("Good","Medium","Bad"),c("Content","Logistic","Trainer","Supply","User contribution"))) plot(corresp(data,nf=2),xlim=c(-1,1),ylim=c(-1,1)); The plot is

Hi all, I am trying to compile R in 64-bit addressing mode under AIX 5.1. Currently, I am using the following. ./configure -without-x CC='xlC_r' F77='xlf_r' CXX='xlC_r' CFLAGS='-q64 -g -qfullpath' FFLAGS='-q64 -g -qfullpath' CXXFLAGS='-q64 -g -qfullpath' MAIN_LDFLAGS='-q64 -g -qfullpath' LDFLAGS='-q64'

On May 9, 2012, at 4:27 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hello Jonas, > >> I wonder, what would be the best solution for instructions that require >> operands in a particular register, and even gives the result in a particular >> register? > You need to custom select such instruction. See e.g. div / idiv on x86 > as an example. That's often easiest, yes;

I'm experienced in statistics, but I am a first-time R user. I would like to use R for correspondence analysis. I have installed R (Mac OSX). I have used the package installer to install the CA package. I have run the following line with no errors to read in the data for a table: NonLuxury <- read.table("/Users/myUserName/Desktop/nonLuxury.data.txt") The R online help

Gabor Greif wrote: > Hi all, > > I am almost ready for the last step with landing my long-standing patch. > I have converted (almost) all low-level interface users of CallInst to > respective high-level interfaces. What remains is a handful of hunks > to flip the switch. > > But before I do the final commit I'd like to coerce all external users > to code against the

Compiling package methods, R-1.5.0, on Solaris 5.7 failed (output below) for me with - gcc-2.95.3, perl-5.005_03 and also - gcc-3.0.4, perl-5.6.1 Any ideas a) what the problem is or even better b) how to solve it? Uwe Ligges =================================== [...] building package 'methods' ../../../library/methods/man/methods.Rd is unchanged making do_substitute_direct.d from