similar to: R_Interactive decision to halt execution during errors

Dear R developers, this mail is basically a summary / clarification of some previous mails I sent to this list last week (subject "Catching warning and error output"). Duncan Murdoch pointed out that these were badly organized, and suggested I repost, collecting the main points previously spread out between several mails. Problem statement: In an application embedding R, I would

I'd like someone familiar with the R options initialization to comment on a difference of behavior within/without mpiexec I have a (.NET) application with embedded R that is proven to run in a single process: ./Sample1.exe on a Debian Linux with R 3.0.2 Running the same code with mpiexec, it fails at the R engine initialization: mpiexec -n 1 ./Sample1.exe Fatal error: you must

Hi all, I'm working on a GUI frontend for R, and I'm looking for a good way to catch all warning- and error-output. The reason for this is mostly, that I would like to know, which sections of the output are "normal" output, warnings, and errors. This would allow for some nice features, such as highlighting warnings and errors in a different color, or popping up a message

Dear all, my aim is to integrate R in an interactive visualisation software called Bulk Analyzer developed by VrVis (http://www.vrvis.at). the code: SEXP e, tmp; ParseStatus status; PROTECT(tmp = mkString("x <- c(1.234,-3.45)")); PrintValue(tmp); PROTECT(e = R_ParseVector(tmp, -1, &status, R_NilValue)); PrintValue(e); UNPROTECT(2); produces the following output: [1] "x

I'm using: R 2.15.1 (beta), 2012-06-11, svn.rev 59557, x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu And I normally use: options("error"=recover) I recently ran into a problem where when my code called stop(), recover() was incredibly slow (hours) because it was trying to deparse an extremely large call. I worked around that by instead using my own recover function which avoids deparsing anything

Thanks Bill for checking that. It was my impression that warnings are raised from some internal system calls made when quitting R. At that point I don't have much control over checking the return status of those. Your suggestion looks good to me. Tomas, do you think this could help? could this be implemented? On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 7:10 PM Bill Dunlap <williamwdunlap at gmail.com>

Dear R-developers, even though I may not be the first one to encounter the problem described below, I would really appreciate some help or a link to a forum where this topic is being discussed. Probably I am simply misinformed on the usage of structRstart but see for youselve. I did check multiple forums and the whole internet on the topic without success. I am using the shared library version

Dear list, I am trying to implement a publish-subscribe mechanism in for an embedded R interpreter. But somehow my registered closures seem to get collected by the GC, even though I have protected them. I have reducted my code to the following sample. Sorry if it is a little verbose. The first couple of call of calls still work, but at some point one of the callbacks (callback1 in my

The call to system() probably is an internal call used to delete the session's tempdir(). This sort of failure means that a potentially large amount of disk space is not being recovered when R is done. Perhaps R_CleanTempDir() could call R_unlink() instead of having a subprocess call 'rm -rf ...'. Then it could also issue a specific warning if it was impossible to delete all of

Hi - I wrapped R.dll up using somebody code online (see below). I am comparing R on .NET IPC with R(D)COM. I got it all working. Except, I realize that in my client code of the IPC remoting, if I call 'plot' function in R via EvaluateNoReturn, I don't seem to see any results on the R plot window (although the window pops up). Is there anything to do with the code of R.dll wrapper

As for other calls to system. I avoid calling system. In the past I had some (to get memory stats from OS), but they were failing with exactly the same issue. So yes, if I would add call to system before calling quit, I believe it would fail with the same error. At the same time I think (although I am not sure) that new allocations made in R are working fine. So R seems to reserve some memory and

After a long processing, I was able to create a version of a small C# class that was able to emulate the rproxy by P/Invoke. This is mostly to find a workaround a performance problem of the StatConnector. It's almost work but ... I have strange memory exception when I call the print function. The variable seems to not survive from one call to the other. As there is no debug symbol for

On 11/24/20 11:27 AM, Jan Gorecki wrote: > Thanks Bill for checking that. > It was my impression that warnings are raised from some internal > system calls made when quitting R. At that point I don't have much > control over checking the return status of those. > Your suggestion looks good to me. > > Tomas, do you think this could help? could this be implemented? I think

Hi all, I have been trying to add the line: h = n - p0 + 1; just after h = n / 2 + 1; (line 131) in the source code (the original paper mention this is possible for p0&lt;n). with p0 declared as an int (actually i used the same declaration protocol as n everywhere in the code). The &quot;new&quot; source compiles, but when i give it reasonable values of p0, it runs unto

I have the following contrived code in package format. On Solaris and Mac OS X, code runs just fine. On Windows, it crashes the R environment with the "Send Bug Report" dialog. I tried R 1.8.1 (Win2K) and R 1.9 (WinXP) binaries with the same result. PCs otherwise appear properly configured for creating R packages. Anything blatantly wrong? Suggestions? TIA Relevant files from package

On Tue, 24 Nov 2020, Jan Gorecki wrote: > As for other calls to system. I avoid calling system. In the past I > had some (to get memory stats from OS), but they were failing with > exactly the same issue. So yes, if I would add call to system before > calling quit, I believe it would fail with the same error. > At the same time I think (although I am not sure) that new allocations

On Sun, 15 Sep 2019, Jan Gorecki wrote: > Dear R-devel community, > > There appears to be an inconsistency in R C API about the exceptions > that can be raised from C code. > Mapping of R C funs to corresponding R functions is as follows. > > error -> stop > warning -> warning > REprintf -> message This is wrong: REpintf is like cat with file = stderr().

You can file it as a wishlist item in the bug trackign system. Without a compelling case or a complete and well tested patch or both I doubt it will rise to the top of anyone's priority list. Best, luke On Sun, 15 Sep 2019, Jan Gorecki wrote: > Thank you Luke for prompt reply. > Is it possible then to request a new function to R C API "message" > that would equivalent to

Dear R-devel community, There appears to be an inconsistency in R C API about the exceptions that can be raised from C code. Mapping of R C funs to corresponding R functions is as follows. error -> stop warning -> warning REprintf -> message Rprintf -> cat Rprint/cat is of course not an exception, I listed it just for completeness. The inconsistency I would like to report is

Full_Name: Russell Senior Version: 0.64.0 OS: linux-2.2.x Submission from: (NULL) (198.107.133.11) It appears that the GNU readline history size is limited to 50 entries. This is apparently occurring because R is not bothering to override the readline default value (from readline-4.0): ./history.c:59:#define DEFAULT_HISTORY_GROW_SIZE 50 It appears that it ought to be possible to override